CC
The Chemours Company
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$3.36B
5Y Perf.+70.9%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CC vs TROX vs KRO vs OLN vs ASIX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc
Chemicals
Market Cap$1.34B
5Y Perf.+26.7%
KRO
Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$811M
5Y Perf.-27.8%
OLN
Olin Corporation
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.+122.4%
ASIX
AdvanSix Inc.
Chemicals
Market Cap$796M
5Y Perf.+102.8%
CC vs TROX vs KRO vs OLN vs ASIX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CC | TROX | KRO | OLN | ASIX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals |
| Market Cap | $3.36B | $1.34B | $811M | $3.05B | $796M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.82B | $2.92B | $1.88B | $6.72B | $1.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-411M | $-359M | $-134M | $-127M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 15.1% | 5.8% | 10.1% | 5.3% | 10.8% |
| Operating Margin | -0.8% | -4.8% | -3.1% | -1.6% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 15.5x | — | — | — | 15.7x |
| Total Debt | $4.58B | $3.59B | $577M | $3.39B | $381M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $672M | $211M | $37M | $168M | $20M |
CC vs TROX vs KRO vs OLN vs ASIX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CC
TROX
KRO
OLN
ASIX
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Chemours Company (CC) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
| Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
| Kronos Worldwide, I… (KRO) | 100 | 72.2 | -27.8% |
| Olin Corporation (OLN) | 100 | 222.4 | +122.4% |
| AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) | 100 | 202.8 | +102.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CC vs TROX vs KRO vs OLN vs ASIX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ASIX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. The Chemours Company is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. TROX and OLN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CC
The Chemours Company
The Long-Run Compounder
CC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 219.7% 10Y total return vs KRO's 129.0%
- Lower P/E (15.5x vs 15.7x)
- +108.8% vs KRO's -1.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc
The Income Pick
TROX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 3.6% yield, vs OLN's 3.0%
Best for: dividends
KRO
Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
KRO is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.57, yield 2.8%, current ratio 2.70x
Best for: defensive
OLN
Olin Corporation
The Income Pick
OLN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.47, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth -140.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.2%
- 3.7% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ASIX
AdvanSix Inc.
The Defensive Pick
ASIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 46.7%, current ratio 1.13x
- 3.2% margin vs TROX's -12.3%
- Beta 0.81 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage
- 2.9% ROA vs KRO's -9.4%, ROIC 4.4% vs -1.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | OLN | 3.7% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7% |
| Value | CC | Lower P/E (15.5x vs 15.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | ASIX | 3.2% margin vs TROX's -12.3% |
| Stability / Safety | ASIX | Beta 0.81 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage |
| Dividends | TROX | 3.6% yield, vs OLN's 3.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CC | +108.8% vs KRO's -1.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ASIX | 2.9% ROA vs KRO's -9.4%, ROIC 4.4% vs -1.9% |
CC vs TROX vs KRO vs OLN vs ASIX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2014
FY 2025
FY 2025
CC vs TROX vs KRO vs OLN vs ASIX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLASIXLAGGINGOLN
Who Leads Where
ASIX leads in 3 of 6 categories
CC leads 0 • TROX leads 0 • KRO leads 0 • OLN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓OLNOlin Corporation
0leads
KROKronos Worldwide, Inc.
0leads
TROXTronox Holdings plc
0leads
CCThe Chemours Company
0leads
ASIXAdvanSix Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CCvs TROXMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ASIX3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ASIX9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ASIX2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASIX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OLN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.7B annually — 4.4x ASIX's $1.5B. ASIX is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TROX's -12.3%. On growth, ASIX holds the edge at +9.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CCThe Chemours Comp… | TROXTronox Holdings p… | KROKronos Worldwide,… | OLNOlin Corporation | ASIXAdvanSix Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.8B | $2.9B | $1.9B | $6.7B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132M | $166M | -$9M | $284M | $143M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$411M | -$359M | -$134M | -$127M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $198M | -$139M | $35M | $352M | $6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +5.8% | +10.1% | +5.3% | +10.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | -4.8% | -3.1% | -1.6% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | -12.3% | -7.1% | -1.9% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | -4.8% | +1.9% | +5.2% | +0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.0% | +3.0% | +4.1% | -3.7% | +9.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | +7.1% | -126.1% | -61.8% | -8.8% |
ASIX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OLN and ASIX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ASIX's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRO's 40.7x.
| Metric | CCThe Chemours Comp… | TROXTronox Holdings p… | KROKronos Worldwide,… | OLNOlin Corporation | ASIXAdvanSix Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $1.3B | $811M | $3.0B | $796M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.3B | $4.7B | $1.4B | $6.3B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.75x | -2.83x | -7.34x | -72.32x | 13.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.55x | — | — | — | 15.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 7.10x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.72x | 16.80x | 40.71x | 9.88x | 7.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 0.46x | 0.44x | 0.45x | 0.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.44x | 0.92x | 1.08x | 1.59x | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 65.93x | — | — | 12.29x | 124.10x |
Evenly matched — OLN and ASIX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASIX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASIX delivers a 6.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-163 for CC. ASIX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CC's 18.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASIX scores 6/9 vs TROX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CCThe Chemours Comp… | TROXTronox Holdings p… | KROKronos Worldwide,… | OLNOlin Corporation | ASIXAdvanSix Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -163.4% | -30.4% | -17.0% | -6.6% | +6.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.5% | -7.7% | -9.4% | -1.7% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | -0.3% | -1.9% | +1.7% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | -0.4% | -2.2% | +1.9% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 18.27x | 2.48x | 0.77x | 1.76x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.9B | $3.4B | $540M | $3.2B | $361M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $672M | $211M | $37M | $168M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $3.6B | $577M | $3.4B | $381M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.15x | -1.16x | -2.32x | 0.66x | 7.92x |
ASIX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CC and KRO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASIX five years ago would be worth $8,411 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,493 for TROX. Over the past 12 months, CC leads with a +108.8% total return vs KRO's -1.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRO at -0.2% vs OLN's -19.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CCThe Chemours Comp… | TROXTronox Holdings p… | KROKronos Worldwide,… | OLNOlin Corporation | ASIXAdvanSix Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +83.6% | +98.1% | +58.5% | +25.1% | +40.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +108.8% | +76.9% | -1.2% | +35.2% | +8.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.7% | -23.6% | -0.7% | -46.8% | -25.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.7% | -55.1% | -43.9% | -33.9% | -15.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +219.7% | +116.1% | +129.0% | +61.0% | +60.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.5% | -8.6% | -0.2% | -19.0% | -9.4% |
Evenly matched — CC and KRO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASIX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASIX is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASIX currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs CC's 78.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CCThe Chemours Comp… | TROXTronox Holdings p… | KROKronos Worldwide,… | OLNOlin Corporation | ASIXAdvanSix Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 2.37x | 1.57x | 1.47x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.67 | $10.59 | $7.90 | $30.46 | $26.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.13 | $2.86 | $4.08 | $18.08 | $14.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.1% | +79.4% | +89.2% | +87.8% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 58.5 | 63.4 | 58.6 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 3.1M | 350K | 2.7M | 453K |
ASIX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TROX and OLN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CC as "Hold", TROX as "Buy", KRO as "Hold", OLN as "Hold", ASIX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -1.2% upside for CC (target: $22) vs -29.1% for KRO (target: $5). For income investors, TROX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs CC's 2.31%.
| Metric | CCThe Chemours Comp… | TROXTronox Holdings p… | KROKronos Worldwide,… | OLNOlin Corporation | ASIXAdvanSix Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.14 | $7.25 | $5.00 | $24.33 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 17 | 7 | 35 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +3.6% | +2.8% | +3.0% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.52 | $0.30 | $0.20 | $0.80 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +0.2% |
Evenly matched — TROX and OLN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ASIX leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
Best OverallAdvanSix Inc. (ASIX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CC vs TROX vs KRO vs OLN vs ASIX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CC or TROX or KRO or OLN or ASIX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Olin Corporation (OLN) is the stronger pick with 3.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CC or TROX or KRO or OLN or ASIX?
On forward P/E, The Chemours Company is actually cheaper at 15.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CC or TROX or KRO or OLN or ASIX?
Over the past 5 years, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) delivered a total return of -15. 9%, compared to -55. 1% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CC returned +219. 7% versus ASIX's +60. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CC or TROX or KRO or OLN or ASIX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 192% more volatile than ASIX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 18% for The Chemours Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CC or TROX or KRO or OLN or ASIX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Olin Corporation (OLN) is pulling ahead at 3.
7% versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AdvanSix Inc. grew EPS 11. 1% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, KRO leads at -1. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CC or TROX or KRO or OLN or ASIX?
AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASIX leads at 4. 4% versus -1. 7% for KRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CC leads at 15. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CC or TROX or KRO or OLN or ASIX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Chemours Company (CC) trades at 15.
5x forward P/E versus 15. 7x for AdvanSix Inc. — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CC: -1. 2% to $22. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — CC or TROX or KRO or OLN or ASIX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 3% for The Chemours Company (CC).
09Is CC or TROX or KRO or OLN or ASIX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 2. 6% yield). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASIX: +60. 6%, TROX: +116. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CC and TROX and KRO and OLN and ASIX?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OLN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CC: 1.0% · TROX: 3.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.