Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CCEL vs BDX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
CCEL vs BDX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $28M | $52.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $21.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $400K | $1.76B |
| Gross Margin | 77.1% | 45.8% |
| Operating Margin | 13.6% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | 70.6x | 11.6x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $19.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $561K | $851M |
CCEL vs BDX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryo-Cell Internati… (CCEL) | 100 | 47.7 | -52.3% |
| Becton, Dickinson a… (BDX) | 100 | 97.3 | -2.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCEL vs BDX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCEL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, current ratio 0.58x
- Beta 0.35, yield 7.0%, current ratio 0.58x
BDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth -0.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 72.9% 10Y total return vs CCEL's 56.3%
- 8.2% revenue growth vs CCEL's 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs CCEL's 2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 70.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.0% margin vs CCEL's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs BDX's 0.66 | |
| Dividends | 7.0% yield, vs BDX's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.3% vs CCEL's -23.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs CCEL's 0.6% |
CCEL vs BDX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCEL vs BDX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CCEL and BDX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BDX is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.9B annually — 690.5x CCEL's $32M. BDX is the more profitable business, keeping 8.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCEL's 1.3%. On growth, BDX holds the edge at +1.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $21.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $399,609 | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.1% | +45.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.1% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.8% | +28.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CCEL leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.8x trailing earnings, BDX trades at a 65% valuation discount to CCEL's 70.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCEL's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BDX's 14.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $52.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $70.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 70.60x | 24.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.30x | 14.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.89x | 2.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.88x | 19.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCEL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.3% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $18.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $560,960 | $851M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $19.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.62x | 4.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BDX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BDX five years ago would be worth $11,037 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,976 for CCEL. Over the past 12 months, BDX leads with a +45.3% total return vs CCEL's -23.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BDX at -0.1% vs CCEL's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.9% | -4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.5% | +45.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.8% | -0.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.2% | +10.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.3% | +72.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.8% | -0.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CCEL and BDX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCEL is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BDX's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BDX currently trades 70.4% from its 52-week high vs CCEL's 55.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.35 | $205.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.72 | $100.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.6% | +70.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 30.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CCEL and BDX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CCEL offers the higher dividend yield at 6.97% vs BDX's 2.88%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $172.85 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.0% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.25 | $4.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.0% | +1.9% |
CCEL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BDX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
CCEL vs BDX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCEL or BDX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is the stronger pick with 8.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 0% for Cryo-Cell International, Inc. (CCEL). Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCEL or BDX?
On trailing P/E, Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is the cheapest at 24.
8x versus Cryo-Cell International, Inc. at 70. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCEL or BDX?
Over the past 5 years, Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) delivered a total return of +10.
4%, compared to -40. 2% for Cryo-Cell International, Inc. (CCEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BDX returned +72. 9% versus CCEL's +56. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCEL or BDX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cryo-Cell International, Inc.
(CCEL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Becton, Dickinson and Company's 0. 66β — meaning BDX is approximately 87% more volatile than CCEL relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CCEL or BDX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is pulling ahead at 8.
2% versus 2. 0% for Cryo-Cell International, Inc. (CCEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cryo-Cell International, Inc. grew EPS 104. 4% year-over-year, compared to -0. 5% for Becton, Dickinson and Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, BDX leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCEL or BDX?
Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
7% net margin versus 1. 3% for Cryo-Cell International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BDX leads at 11. 8% versus 10. 9% for CCEL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCEL leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — CCEL or BDX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cryo-Cell International, Inc. (CCEL) offers the highest yield at 7. 0%, versus 2. 9% for Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX).
08Is CCEL or BDX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cryo-Cell International, Inc.
(CCEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 7. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCEL: +56. 3%, BDX: +72. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CCEL and BDX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCEL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BDX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare BDX vs BAX
BAX is one of the most direct listed alternatives to BDX.
Compare CCEL vs VCEL
VCEL overlaps with CCEL in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With BAX + BSX
BAX and BSX are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.