Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CCG vs BEKE vs OPEN vs COMP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Real Estate - Services
Software - Application
CCG vs BEKE vs OPEN vs COMP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $58M | $61.48B | $4.08B | $5.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.18B | $103.52B | $3.94B | $8.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $3.48B | $-1.39B | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 5.0% | 21.9% | 7.9% | 10.8% |
| Operating Margin | -1.1% | 3.2% | -9.9% | -4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 59.5x | 3.3x | — | 53.5x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $22.65B | $193M | $454M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $11.44B | $962M | $199M |
CCG vs BEKE vs OPEN vs COMP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheche Group Inc. (CCG) | 100 | 6.2 | -93.8% |
| KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) | 100 | 118.7 | +18.7% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 201.5 | +101.5% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 301.7 | +201.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCG vs BEKE vs OPEN vs COMP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.49
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 9.9%, current ratio 1.34x
- Beta 0.49, current ratio 1.34x
- Beta 0.49 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage
BEKE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -47.8% 10Y total return vs COMP's -56.6%
- Lower P/E (3.3x vs 53.5x)
- 3.4% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
- 1.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.1% vs CCG's -21.5%
COMP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 23.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.3x vs 53.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.4% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs CCG's -21.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 3.7% vs -15.8% |
CCG vs BEKE vs OPEN vs COMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CCG vs BEKE vs OPEN vs COMP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BEKE leads in 2 of 6 categories
COMP leads 1 • CCG leads 0 • OPEN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEKE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEKE is the larger business by revenue, generating $103.5B annually — 32.5x CCG's $3.2B. BEKE is the more profitable business, keeping 3.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $103.5B | $3.9B | $8.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | $4.3B | -$363M | -$100M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $3.5B | -$1.4B | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $2.4B | $1.1B | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +21.9% | +7.9% | +10.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +3.2% | -9.9% | -4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +3.4% | -35.2% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +2.3% | +27.2% | +0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.8% | +2.1% | -37.6% | +99.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.4% | -32.7% | -50.0% | +133.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CCG and COMP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, COMP's 66.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BEKE's 89.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $58M | $61.5B | $4.1B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $46M | $63.1B | $3.3B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.39x | 36.34x | -3.13x | -87.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 59.54x | 3.27x | — | 53.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 89.92x | — | 66.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 4.48x | 0.93x | 0.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.10x | 2.07x | 4.06x | 6.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 49.75x | 3.93x | 26.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BEKE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BEKE delivers a 5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. CCG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COMP's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BEKE scores 5/9 vs CCG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.4% | +5.0% | -163.2% | +1.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | +2.7% | -53.6% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.8% | +3.7% | -15.8% | -2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.6% | +4.7% | -11.7% | -2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.32x | 0.19x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$82M | $11.2B | -$769M | $255M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $11.4B | $962M | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $22.7B | $193M | $454M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -83.35x | 131.87x | -8.92x | -0.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COMP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COMP five years ago would be worth $5,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $206 for CCG. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs CCG's -21.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 49.1% vs CCG's -72.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.7% | +16.1% | -12.4% | -16.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.5% | -4.8% | +510.1% | +14.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +22.5% | +159.5% | +231.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -61.6% | -71.6% | -48.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -47.8% | -50.8% | -56.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.6% | +7.0% | +37.4% | +49.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CCG and BEKE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCG is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEKE currently trades 87.8% from its 52-week high vs CCG's 43.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.83x | 3.09x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.54 | $20.98 | $10.87 | $13.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.65 | $14.40 | $0.51 | $5.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.3% | +87.8% | +48.9% | +62.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 75.4 | 56.2 | 65.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 92K | 4.0M | 36.3M | 14.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCG as "Buy", BEKE as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", COMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs 20.1% for BEKE (target: $22). BEKE is the only dividend payer here at 1.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.13 | $6.50 | $14.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 12 | 26 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.40 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BEKE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COMP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CCG vs BEKE vs OPEN vs COMP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCG or BEKE or OPEN or COMP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) offers the better valuation at 36. 3x trailing P/E (3. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cheche Group Inc. (CCG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCG or BEKE or OPEN or COMP?
On forward P/E, KE Holdings Inc.
is actually cheaper at 3. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCG or BEKE or OPEN or COMP?
Over the past 5 years, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) delivered a total return of -48. 3%, compared to -97. 9% for Cheche Group Inc. (CCG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BEKE returned -47. 8% versus CCG's -97. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCG or BEKE or OPEN or COMP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cheche Group Inc.
(CCG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 534% more volatile than CCG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cheche Group Inc. (CCG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 58% for Compass, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCG or BEKE or OPEN or COMP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cheche Group Inc. grew EPS 96. 5% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCG leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCG or BEKE or OPEN or COMP?
KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 3% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BEKE leads at 4. 0% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEKE leads at 24. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCG or BEKE or OPEN or COMP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) trades at 3. 3x forward P/E versus 59. 5x for Cheche Group Inc. — 56. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 63. 3% to $14. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCG or BEKE or OPEN or COMP?
In this comparison, BEKE (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. CCG, OPEN, COMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CCG or BEKE or OPEN or COMP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 1. 9% yield). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BEKE: -47. 8%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCG and BEKE and OPEN and COMP?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCG (Communication Services) and BEKE (Real Estate) and OPEN (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEKE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock. BEKE pays a dividend while CCG, OPEN, COMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.