Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CCK vs AMBP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
CCK vs AMBP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $11.35B | $2.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.37B | $5.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $737M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $6.17B | $4.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $879M | $522M |
CCK vs AMBP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) | 100 | 131.5 | +31.5% |
| Ardagh Metal Packag… (AMBP) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCK vs AMBP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.0%
- 98.1% 10Y total return vs AMBP's -44.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, current ratio 1.03x
AMBP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 59.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- Beta 0.81, yield 11.0%, current ratio 1.06x
- 12.0% revenue growth vs CCK's 4.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.0% revenue growth vs CCK's 4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.5x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.0% margin vs AMBP's 0.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs AMBP's 0.81 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs AMBP's 11.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.3% vs CCK's +4.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs AMBP's 0.2%, ROIC 14.1% vs 6.5% |
CCK vs AMBP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CCK vs AMBP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.4B annually — 2.2x AMBP's $5.7B. CCK is the more profitable business, keeping 6.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMBP's 0.2%. On growth, AMBP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.4B | $5.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $753M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $737M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +10.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.6% | +58.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AMBP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CCK's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMBP's 8.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.3B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.6B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.84x | -215.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.46x | 16.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.05x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.95x | 8.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.92x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.36x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.33x | 8.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCK scores 7/9 vs AMBP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.1% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.0% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.77x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.3B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $879M | $522M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.2B | $4.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.00x | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMBP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCK five years ago would be worth $9,380 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,413 for AMBP. Over the past 12 months, AMBP leads with a +21.3% total return vs CCK's +4.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMBP at 10.5% vs CCK's 7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.6% | -1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.9% | +21.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.5% | +35.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.2% | -45.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.1% | -44.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.3% | +10.5% |
Risk & Volatility
CCK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCK is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMBP's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCK currently trades 86.7% from its 52-week high vs AMBP's 78.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $116.62 | $5.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $89.21 | $3.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.7% | +78.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.8 | 43.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 977K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CCK and AMBP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CCK as "Buy" and AMBP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.2% upside for CCK (target: $121) vs 13.9% for AMBP (target: $5). For income investors, AMBP offers the higher dividend yield at 11.04% vs CCK's 1.03%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $120.50 | $4.52 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +11.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.04 | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.5% | 0.0% |
CCK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMBP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CCK vs AMBP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCK or AMBP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 8% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK). Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCK or AMBP?
On forward P/E, Crown Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 12. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCK or AMBP?
Over the past 5 years, Crown Holdings, Inc.
(CCK) delivered a total return of -6. 2%, compared to -45. 9% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCK returned +98. 1% versus AMBP's -44. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCK or AMBP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Crown Holdings, Inc.
(CCK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. 's 0. 81β — meaning AMBP is approximately 69% more volatile than CCK relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CCK or AMBP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus 4. 8% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crown Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 79. 7% year-over-year, compared to 59. 3% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMBP leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCK or AMBP?
Crown Holdings, Inc.
(CCK) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus 0. 2% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCK leads at 13. 2% versus 5. 0% for AMBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCK leads at 18. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCK or AMBP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Crown Holdings, Inc.
(CCK) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — 3. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCK: 19. 2% to $120. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCK or AMBP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP) offers the highest yield at 11. 0%, versus 1. 0% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK).
09Is CCK or AMBP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Crown Holdings, Inc.
(CCK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 1. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCK: +98. 1%, AMBP: -44. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCK and AMBP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCK is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AMBP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.