Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CCRN vs MAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
CCRN vs MAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $326M | $1.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.05B | $17.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-95M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 18.7% | 16.7% |
| Operating Margin | -0.3% | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 103.4x | 8.0x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $109M | $871M |
CCRN vs MAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cross Country Healt… (CCRN) | 100 | 166.6 | +66.6% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 42.3 | -57.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCRN vs MAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCRN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.78
- -28.1% 10Y total return vs MAN's -32.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 3.78x
MAN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.6%, EPS growth -109.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.2%
- 0.6% revenue growth vs CCRN's -21.6%
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 103.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.6% revenue growth vs CCRN's -21.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 103.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.1% margin vs CCRN's -9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs MAN's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -21.0% vs CCRN's -26.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.1% ROA vs CCRN's -17.9%, ROIC 5.6% vs -0.9% |
CCRN vs MAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCRN vs MAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 17.0x CCRN's $1.1B. MAN is the more profitable business, keeping -0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCRN's -9.0%. On growth, MAN holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $18.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13M | $236M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$95M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $42M | -$161M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | +16.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | -0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.6% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.3% | +36.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CCRN's 16.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $326M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $220M | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.45x | -100.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 103.37x | 7.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.49x | 8.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.76x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAN delivers a -0.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-24 for CCRN. CCRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCRN scores 6/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.3% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.9% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.9% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$106M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $109M | $871M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.56x | 1.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CCRN and MAN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCRN five years ago would be worth $6,276 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,406 for MAN. Over the past 12 months, MAN leads with a -21.0% total return vs CCRN's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAN at -19.6% vs CCRN's -24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.4% | -2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.6% | -21.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.0% | -48.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.2% | -65.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | -32.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.5% | -19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
CCRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAN's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCRN currently trades 67.4% from its 52-week high vs MAN's 61.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.99 | $47.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.43 | $25.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.4% | +61.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.4 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 451K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
CCRN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CCRN as "Hold" and MAN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 29.3% upside for MAN (target: $38) vs 4.9% for CCRN (target: $11). MAN is the only dividend payer here at 4.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.61 | $37.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.8% |
MAN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CCRN leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CCRN vs MAN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCRN or MAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is the stronger pick with 0. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 6% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). Analysts rate Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CCRN or MAN?
Over the past 5 years, Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.
(CCRN) delivered a total return of -37. 2%, compared to -65. 9% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCRN returned -28. 1% versus MAN's -32. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CCRN or MAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.
(CCRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus ManpowerGroup Inc. 's 1. 03β — meaning MAN is approximately 32% more volatile than CCRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CCRN or MAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is pulling ahead at 0. 6% versus -21. 6% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ManpowerGroup Inc. grew EPS -109. 6% year-over-year, compared to -565. 9% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAN leads at -3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CCRN or MAN?
ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 1% net margin versus -9. 0% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAN leads at 1. 3% versus -0. 3% for CCRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCRN leads at 18. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CCRN or MAN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 103. 4x for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. — 95. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAN: 29. 3% to $37. 86.
07Which pays a better dividend — CCRN or MAN?
In this comparison, MAN (4.
9% yield) pays a dividend. CCRN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CCRN or MAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), 4. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAN: -32. 3%, CCRN: -28. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CCRN and MAN?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCRN (Healthcare) and MAN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MAN pays a dividend while CCRN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.