Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CCSI vs QLYS vs OPEN vs TENB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Real Estate - Services
Software - Infrastructure
CCSI vs QLYS vs OPEN vs TENB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Real Estate - Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $520M | $3.34B | $4.08B | $2.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $351M | $685M | $3.94B | $1.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $88M | $201M | $-1.39B | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 80.2% | 83.1% | 7.9% | 78.2% |
| Operating Margin | 42.9% | 33.7% | -9.9% | 2.9% |
| Forward P/E | 5.0x | 12.9x | — | 11.1x |
| Total Debt | $580M | $97M | $193M | $466M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $250M | $962M | $188M |
CCSI vs QLYS vs OPEN vs TENB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus Cloud Sol… (CCSI) | 100 | 79.4 | -20.6% |
| Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 25.9 | -74.1% |
| Tenable Holdings, I… (TENB) | 100 | 46.7 | -53.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCSI vs QLYS vs OPEN vs TENB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 11.1x)
QLYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.53
- 267.2% 10Y total return vs CCSI's -20.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.41x
- Beta 0.53, current ratio 1.41x
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.1% vs TENB's -31.2%
TENB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth 3.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- 11.0% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.0% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 11.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.4% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs TENB's -31.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.1% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 47.5% vs -15.8% |
CCSI vs QLYS vs OPEN vs TENB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CCSI vs QLYS vs OPEN vs TENB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QLYS leads in 2 of 6 categories
OPEN leads 2 • CCSI leads 0 • TENB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QLYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 11.2x CCSI's $351M. QLYS is the more profitable business, keeping 29.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, QLYS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $351M | $685M | $3.9B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $164M | $241M | -$363M | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $88M | $201M | -$1.4B | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $112M | $290M | $1.1B | $263M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.2% | +83.1% | +7.9% | +78.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +42.9% | +33.7% | -9.9% | +2.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +29.4% | -35.2% | -1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.0% | +42.4% | +27.2% | +25.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.5% | +9.8% | -37.6% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.5% | +10.1% | -50.0% | +106.3% |
Valuation Metrics
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.5x trailing earnings, CCSI trades at a 63% valuation discount to QLYS's 17.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCSI's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TENB's 63.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $520M | $3.3B | $4.1B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $3.2B | $3.3B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.50x | 17.45x | -3.13x | -71.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.99x | 12.87x | — | 11.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.90x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.07x | 13.49x | — | 63.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.49x | 5.00x | 0.93x | 2.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 39.95x | 6.17x | 4.06x | 7.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.92x | 10.98x | 3.93x | 9.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCSI delivers a 52.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. QLYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCSI's 42.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QLYS scores 6/9 vs TENB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +52.9% | +37.2% | -163.2% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.2% | +19.1% | -53.6% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.2% | +47.5% | -15.8% | +0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.8% | +37.8% | -11.7% | +0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 42.14x | 0.17x | 0.19x | 1.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $506M | -$153M | -$769M | $278M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $250M | $962M | $188M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $580M | $97M | $193M | $466M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.95x | — | -8.92x | 1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QLYS five years ago would be worth $9,694 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,845 for OPEN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs TENB's -31.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 37.4% vs TENB's -16.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.2% | -27.5% | -12.4% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.8% | -25.6% | +510.1% | -31.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.8% | -17.7% | +159.5% | -41.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.6% | -3.1% | -71.6% | -41.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.6% | +267.2% | -50.8% | -28.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.9% | -6.3% | +37.4% | -16.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CCSI and QLYS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCSI currently trades 89.3% from its 52-week high vs OPEN's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 0.53x | 3.09x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.66 | $155.47 | $10.87 | $35.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.24 | $74.51 | $0.51 | $15.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.3% | +61.1% | +48.9% | +60.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 54.2 | 56.2 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 123K | 773K | 36.3M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCSI as "Buy", QLYS as "Hold", OPEN as "Hold", TENB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.5% upside for QLYS (target: $134) vs -11.6% for CCSI (target: $25).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $134.30 | $6.50 | $27.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 48 | 26 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | +5.5% | 0.0% | +10.0% |
QLYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPEN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CCSI vs QLYS vs OPEN vs TENB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCSI or QLYS or OPEN or TENB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (5. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCSI or QLYS or OPEN or TENB?
On trailing P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) is the cheapest at 6. 5x versus Qualys, Inc. at 17. 5x. On forward P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCSI or QLYS or OPEN or TENB?
Over the past 5 years, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) delivered a total return of -3. 1%, compared to -71. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QLYS returned +267. 2% versus OPEN's -50. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCSI or QLYS or OPEN or TENB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 482% more volatile than QLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 42% for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCSI or QLYS or OPEN or TENB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qualys, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TENB leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCSI or QLYS or OPEN or TENB?
Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCSI leads at 43. 0% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QLYS leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCSI or QLYS or OPEN or TENB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for Qualys, Inc. — 7. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QLYS: 41. 5% to $134. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCSI or QLYS or OPEN or TENB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CCSI or QLYS or OPEN or TENB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), +267. 2% 10Y return). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QLYS: +267. 2%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCSI and QLYS and OPEN and TENB?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCSI (Technology) and QLYS (Technology) and OPEN (Real Estate) and TENB (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCSI is a small-cap deep-value stock; QLYS is a small-cap deep-value stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TENB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.