Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CCZ vs T
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
CCZ vs T — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $238.18B | $178.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $125.28B | $126.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18.80B | $21.41B |
| Gross Margin | -23.9% | 79.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 19.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.2x | 11.1x |
| Total Debt | $5.96B | $173.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9.48B | $18.23B |
CCZ vs T — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comcast Holdings Co… (CCZ) | 100 | 113.0 | +13.0% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | 100 | 109.7 | +9.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCZ vs T
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 76.5% 10Y total return vs T's 42.4%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.09, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 0.88x
- Lower D/E ratio (6.1% vs 135.4%)
T is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta -0.26, yield 4.5%
- Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 104.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.3%
- Beta -0.26, yield 4.5%, current ratio 0.91x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.7% revenue growth vs CCZ's -0.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.1x vs 12.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.9% margin vs CCZ's 15.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (6.1% vs 135.4%) | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs T's 4.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.5% vs T's -5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs T's 5.1%, ROIC 11.4% vs 6.7% |
CCZ vs T — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCZ vs T — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
T leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
T and CCZ operate at a comparable scale, with $126.5B and $125.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.9% (T) to 15.0% (CCZ).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $125.3B | $126.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16.7B | $45.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18.8B | $21.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20.4B | $10.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -23.9% | +79.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +19.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +16.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.3% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.6% | -11.5% |
Valuation Metrics
T leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, T trades at a 31% valuation discount to CCZ's 12.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCZ's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than T's 7.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $238.2B | $178.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $234.7B | $334.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.22x | 8.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.65x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.36x | 7.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 1.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.51x | 1.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.88x | 9.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCZ leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCZ delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $17 for T. CCZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to T's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCZ scores 8/9 vs T's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.7% | +16.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.1% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.9% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 1.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.5B | $155.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9.5B | $18.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.0B | $174.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.40x | 4.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CCZ and T each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in T five years ago would be worth $13,012 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,701 for CCZ. Over the past 12 months, CCZ leads with a +7.5% total return vs T's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors T at 19.0% vs CCZ's 4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.5% | +6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.5% | -5.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.1% | +68.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.0% | +30.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.5% | +42.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.8% | +19.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CCZ and T each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
T is the less volatile stock with a -0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCZ's -0.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCZ currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs T's 85.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.09x | -0.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.00 | $29.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.00 | $22.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +85.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.7 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 190 | 33.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CCZ and T each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, T offers the higher dividend yield at 4.46% vs CCZ's 2.00%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 18 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.32 | $1.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +2.5% |
T leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CCZ leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CCZ vs T: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCZ or T a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AT&T Inc.
(T) is the stronger pick with 2. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ). AT&T Inc. (T) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AT&T Inc. (T) a "Hold" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCZ or T?
On trailing P/E, AT&T Inc.
(T) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Comcast Holdings Corp. at 12. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCZ or T?
Over the past 5 years, AT&T Inc.
(T) delivered a total return of +30. 1%, compared to +17. 0% for Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCZ returned +76. 5% versus T's +42. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCZ or T?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AT&T Inc.
(T) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 26β versus Comcast Holdings Corp. 's -0. 09β — meaning CCZ is approximately -64% more volatile than T relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 135% for AT&T Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCZ or T?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AT&T Inc.
(T) is pulling ahead at 2. 7% versus -0. 0% for Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AT&T Inc. grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to 30. 2% for Comcast Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, T leads at 1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCZ or T?
AT&T Inc.
(T) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus 15. 9% for Comcast Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: T leads at 19. 2% versus 16. 7% for CCZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — T leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — CCZ or T?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AT&T Inc. (T) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ).
08Is CCZ or T better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AT&T Inc.
(T) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 26), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (T: +42. 4%, CCZ: +76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CCZ and T?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 1.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.