Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CCZ vs T

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CCZ
Comcast Holdings Corp.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$238.18B
5Y Perf.+13.0%
T
AT&T Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$178.43B
5Y Perf.+9.7%

CCZ vs T — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CCZ logoCCZ
T logoT
IndustryBroadcastingTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$238.18B$178.43B
Revenue (TTM)$125.28B$126.52B
Net Income (TTM)$18.80B$21.41B
Gross Margin-23.9%79.7%
Operating Margin15.3%19.4%
Forward P/E12.2x11.1x
Total Debt$5.96B$173.99B
Cash & Equiv.$9.48B$18.23B

CCZ vs TLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CCZ
T
StockMay 20May 26Return
Comcast Holdings Co… (CCZ)100113.0+13.0%
AT&T Inc. (T)100109.7+9.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CCZ vs T

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CCZ leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. AT&T Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CCZ
Comcast Holdings Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

CCZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 76.5% 10Y total return vs T's 42.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta -0.09, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 0.88x
  • Lower D/E ratio (6.1% vs 135.4%)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
T
AT&T Inc.
The Income Pick

T is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta -0.26, yield 4.5%
  • Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 104.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.3%
  • Beta -0.26, yield 4.5%, current ratio 0.91x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthT logoT2.7% revenue growth vs CCZ's -0.0%
ValueT logoTLower P/E (11.1x vs 12.2x)
Quality / MarginsT logoT16.9% margin vs CCZ's 15.0%
Stability / SafetyCCZ logoCCZLower D/E ratio (6.1% vs 135.4%)
DividendsCCZ logoCCZ2.0% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs T's 4.5%
Momentum (1Y)CCZ logoCCZ+7.5% vs T's -5.3%
Efficiency (ROA)CCZ logoCCZ9.1% ROA vs T's 5.1%, ROIC 11.4% vs 6.7%

CCZ vs T — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CCZComcast Holdings Corp.
FY 2025
Residential Connectivity And Platforms Segment
57.2%$70.7B
Media Segment
21.9%$27.1B
Studios Segment
9.1%$11.3B
Business Services Connectivity Segment
8.3%$10.2B
Theme Parks
8.0%$9.8B
Corporate and Other
2.5%$3.1B
Intersegment Eliminations
-6.9%$-8,535,000,000
TAT&T Inc.
FY 2025
Wireless Service
55.8%$70.1B
Other Capitalized Property Plant and Equipment
19.5%$24.5B
Business Service
12.7%$16.0B
Legacy Voice and Data
8.2%$10.4B
IP Broadband
2.8%$3.5B
Other Service
0.9%$1.2B

CCZ vs T — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTLAGGINGCCZ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

T leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

T and CCZ operate at a comparable scale, with $126.5B and $125.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.9% (T) to 15.0% (CCZ).

MetricCCZ logoCCZComcast Holdings …T logoTAT&T Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$125.3B$126.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$16.7B$45.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$18.8B$21.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20.4B$10.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-23.9%+79.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.3%+19.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.0%+16.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.3%+8.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.3%+2.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-32.6%-11.5%
T leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

T leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 8.4x trailing earnings, T trades at a 31% valuation discount to CCZ's 12.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCZ's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than T's 7.4x.

MetricCCZ logoCCZComcast Holdings …T logoTAT&T Inc.
Market CapShares × price$238.2B$178.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$234.7B$334.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.22x8.40x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.06x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.65x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.36x7.42x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.93x1.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.51x1.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.88x9.18x
T leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CCZ leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

CCZ delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $17 for T. CCZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to T's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCZ scores 8/9 vs T's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCCZ logoCCZComcast Holdings …T logoTAT&T Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+19.7%+16.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+9.1%+5.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.4%+6.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.9%+6.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–987
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x1.35x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3.5B$155.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9.5B$18.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6.0B$174.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.40x4.97x
CCZ leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CCZ and T each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in T five years ago would be worth $13,012 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,701 for CCZ. Over the past 12 months, CCZ leads with a +7.5% total return vs T's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors T at 19.0% vs CCZ's 4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCCZ logoCCZComcast Holdings …T logoTAT&T Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.5%+6.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+7.5%-5.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+15.1%+68.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+17.0%+30.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+76.5%+42.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+4.8%+19.0%
Evenly matched — CCZ and T each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CCZ and T each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

T is the less volatile stock with a -0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCZ's -0.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCZ currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs T's 85.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCCZ logoCCZComcast Holdings …T logoTAT&T Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.09x-0.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$66.00$29.79
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$59.00$22.95
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.8%+85.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.742.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded19033.7M
Evenly matched — CCZ and T each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CCZ and T each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

For income investors, T offers the higher dividend yield at 4.46% vs CCZ's 2.00%.

MetricCCZ logoCCZComcast Holdings …T logoTAT&T Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.42
# AnalystsCovering analysts62
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+4.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises182
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.32$1.14
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.0%+2.5%
Evenly matched — CCZ and T each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

T leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CCZ leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallAT&T Inc. (T)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CCZ vs T: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CCZ or T a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AT&T Inc.

(T) is the stronger pick with 2. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ). AT&T Inc. (T) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AT&T Inc. (T) a "Hold" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CCZ or T?

On trailing P/E, AT&T Inc.

(T) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Comcast Holdings Corp. at 12. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CCZ or T?

Over the past 5 years, AT&T Inc.

(T) delivered a total return of +30. 1%, compared to +17. 0% for Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCZ returned +76. 5% versus T's +42. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CCZ or T?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AT&T Inc.

(T) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 26β versus Comcast Holdings Corp. 's -0. 09β — meaning CCZ is approximately -64% more volatile than T relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 135% for AT&T Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CCZ or T?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AT&T Inc.

(T) is pulling ahead at 2. 7% versus -0. 0% for Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AT&T Inc. grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to 30. 2% for Comcast Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, T leads at 1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CCZ or T?

AT&T Inc.

(T) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus 15. 9% for Comcast Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: T leads at 19. 2% versus 16. 7% for CCZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — T leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — CCZ or T?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

AT&T Inc. (T) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Comcast Holdings Corp. (CCZ).

08

Is CCZ or T better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AT&T Inc.

(T) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 26), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (T: +42. 4%, CCZ: +76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between CCZ and T?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CCZ

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

T

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CCZ and T on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CCZ: 5.3% · T: 2.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(CCZ: 15.0% · T: 16.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CCZ: 12.2x · T: 8.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.