Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CDE vs AEM vs NEM vs HL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.09B
5Y Perf.+222.8%
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$96.80B
5Y Perf.+201.9%
NEM
Newmont Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$129.09B
5Y Perf.+99.3%
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.48B
5Y Perf.+460.5%

CDE vs AEM vs NEM vs HL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CDE logoCDE
AEM logoAEM
NEM logoNEM
HL logoHL
IndustryGoldGoldGoldGold
Market Cap$12.09B$96.80B$129.09B$12.48B
Revenue (TTM)$2.57B$11.87B$17.23B$1.57B
Net Income (TTM)$799M$4.45B$5.26B$559M
Gross Margin35.4%57.3%52.1%50.9%
Operating Margin39.4%52.9%49.3%44.1%
Forward P/E9.4x13.9x11.2x20.7x
Total Debt$365M$321M$474M$299M
Cash & Equiv.$554M$2.87B$7.65B$242M

CDE vs AEM vs NEM vs HLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CDE
AEM
NEM
HL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)100322.8+222.8%
Agnico Eagle Mines … (AEM)100301.9+201.9%
Newmont Corporation (NEM)100199.3+99.3%
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100560.5+460.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CDE vs AEM vs NEM vs HL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AEM leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Coeur Mining, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. HL also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.
The Growth Play

CDE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
  • PEG 0.18 vs NEM's 0.87
  • 96.4% revenue growth vs NEM's 19.1%
  • Lower P/E (9.4x vs 20.7x)
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
The Income Pick

AEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 0.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 2.02x
  • Beta 0.66, yield 0.7%, current ratio 2.02x
  • 37.5% margin vs NEM's 30.5%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NEM
Newmont Corporation
The Value Angle

NEM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: basic materials exposure
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Long-Run Compounder

HL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 373.7% 10Y total return vs AEM's 363.7%
  • +278.6% vs AEM's +69.9%
  • 16.3% ROA vs NEM's 9.4%, ROIC 15.3% vs 24.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCDE logoCDE96.4% revenue growth vs NEM's 19.1%
ValueCDE logoCDELower P/E (9.4x vs 20.7x)
Quality / MarginsAEM logoAEM37.5% margin vs NEM's 30.5%
Stability / SafetyAEM logoAEMBeta 0.66 vs CDE's 1.89, lower leverage
DividendsAEM logoAEM0.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NEM's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HL logoHL+278.6% vs AEM's +69.9%
Efficiency (ROA)HL logoHL16.3% ROA vs NEM's 9.4%, ROIC 15.3% vs 24.9%

CDE vs AEM vs NEM vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CDECoeur Mining, Inc.
FY 2025
Gold
64.9%$1.3B
Product, Silver
35.1%$726M
AEMAgnico Eagle Mines Limited
FY 2013
Gold
91.5%$1.5B
Silver
6.2%$101M
Copper
1.3%$21M
Zinc
1.0%$17M
Lead
0.1%$900,000
NEMNewmont Corporation
FY 2025
Gold Dore
63.2%$14.3B
Sales From Concentrate And Other Production
36.8%$8.3B
HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000

CDE vs AEM vs NEM vs HL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCDELAGGINGHL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AEM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NEM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 11.0x HL's $1.6B. AEM is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NEM's 30.5%. On growth, CDE holds the edge at +137.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.AEM logoAEMAgnico Eagle Mine…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.6B$11.9B$17.2B$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.2B$7.9B$12.7B$853M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$799M$4.4B$5.3B$559M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$915M$4.4B$12.9B$472M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.4%+57.3%+52.1%+50.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+39.4%+52.9%+49.3%+44.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+31.1%+37.5%+30.5%+35.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+35.6%+37.1%+75.0%+30.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+137.8%+64.9%-100.0%+57.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.9%+199.0%-100.0%-160.0%
AEM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 18.2x trailing earnings, NEM trades at a 52% valuation discount to HL's 38.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CDE offers better value at 0.39x vs NEM's 1.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.AEM logoAEMAgnico Eagle Mine…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Market CapShares × price$12.1B$96.8B$129.1B$12.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11.9B$94.3B$121.9B$12.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.62x21.81x18.18x37.98x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.37x13.94x11.17x20.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.39x0.65x1.42x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.63x11.82x9.29x17.75x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.84x8.13x5.84x8.77x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.65x3.93x3.79x4.71x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.15x22.71x17.69x40.23x
CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — NEM and HL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $15 for CDE. AEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HL's 0.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs CDE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.AEM logoAEMAgnico Eagle Mine…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+15.2%+19.3%+15.6%+22.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+11.2%+13.7%+9.4%+16.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+23.5%+21.9%+24.9%+15.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+23.9%+20.9%+20.7%+16.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96898
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.01x0.01x0.12x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$188M-$2.5B-$7.2B$57M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$554M$2.9B$7.6B$242M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$365M$321M$474M$299M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense47.33x73.32x50.54x19.04x
Evenly matched — NEM and HL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AEM five years ago would be worth $29,406 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,174 for NEM. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +278.6% total return vs AEM's +69.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDE at 74.1% vs NEM's 35.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.AEM logoAEMAgnico Eagle Mine…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+5.8%+13.6%+15.4%-1.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+166.3%+69.9%+122.4%+278.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+427.3%+233.6%+148.4%+203.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+104.0%+194.1%+81.7%+161.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+156.0%+363.7%+302.6%+373.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+74.1%+49.4%+35.4%+44.8%
Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AEM and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEM currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs HL's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.AEM logoAEMAgnico Eagle Mine…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.89x0.66x0.86x1.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.77$255.24$134.88$34.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.20$103.38$48.27$4.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+66.8%+75.7%+86.4%+54.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.041.751.546.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded22.1M2.5M9.1M15.2M
Evenly matched — AEM and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AEM and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CDE as "Buy", AEM as "Buy", NEM as "Buy", HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 46.6% upside for CDE (target: $27) vs 18.0% for NEM (target: $138). For income investors, NEM offers the higher dividend yield at 0.86% vs AEM's 0.75%.

MetricCDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.AEM logoAEMAgnico Eagle Mine…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$27.20$237.71$137.50$22.21
# AnalystsCovering analysts21313626
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+0.9%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0210
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.45$1.00$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+0.7%+1.8%+0.0%
Evenly matched — AEM and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AEM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CDE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 4 tied.

Best OverallCoeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CDE vs AEM vs NEM vs HL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CDE or AEM or NEM or HL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 1% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 18. 2x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CDE or AEM or NEM or HL?

On trailing P/E, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the cheapest at 18.

2x versus Hecla Mining Company at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coeur Mining, Inc. wins at 0. 18x versus Newmont Corporation's 0. 87x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CDE or AEM or NEM or HL?

Over the past 5 years, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) delivered a total return of +194.

1%, compared to +81. 7% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +373. 7% versus CDE's +156. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CDE or AEM or NEM or HL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

66β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning CDE is approximately 187% more volatile than AEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 12% for Hecla Mining Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CDE or AEM or NEM or HL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 19. 1% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 124. 1% for Newmont Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CDE or AEM or NEM or HL?

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the more profitable company, earning 37.

5% net margin versus 22. 6% for Hecla Mining Company — meaning it keeps 37. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEM leads at 53. 1% versus 36. 3% for CDE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEM leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CDE or AEM or NEM or HL more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 18x versus Newmont Corporation's 0. 87x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Hecla Mining Company — 11. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 46. 6% to $27. 20.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CDE or AEM or NEM or HL?

In this comparison, NEM (0.

9% yield), AEM (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CDE, HL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CDE or AEM or NEM or HL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

66), 0. 7% yield, +363. 7% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEM: +363. 7%, CDE: +156. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CDE and AEM and NEM and HL?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

AEM, NEM pay a dividend while CDE, HL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CDE

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 68%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEM

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 32%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NEM

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CDE and AEM and NEM and HL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CDE: 137.8% · AEM: 64.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(CDE: 31.1% · AEM: 37.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CDE: 20.6x · AEM: 21.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.