Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CDE vs HL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
CDE vs HL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $12.04B | $12.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.57B | $1.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $799M | $559M |
| Gross Margin | 35.4% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 39.4% | 44.1% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $365M | $299M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $554M | $242M |
CDE vs HL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) | 100 | 325.9 | +225.9% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 546.7 | +446.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CDE vs HL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CDE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.81
- Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
- 96.4% revenue growth vs HL's 53.0%
HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 327.7% 10Y total return vs CDE's 137.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 2.72x
- Beta 1.26, yield 0.1%, current ratio 2.72x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.4% revenue growth vs HL's 53.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.6% margin vs CDE's 31.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs CDE's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +268.5% vs CDE's +223.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs CDE's 11.2%, ROIC 15.3% vs 23.5% |
CDE vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CDE vs HL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 1.6x HL's $1.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 35.6% (HL) to 31.1% (CDE). On growth, CDE holds the edge at +137.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $853M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $799M | $559M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $915M | $472M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.4% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.4% | +44.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +35.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | +30.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +137.8% | +57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.5% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CDE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.8x trailing earnings, CDE trades at a 44% valuation discount to HL's 37.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CDE's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HL's 17.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.0B | $12.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.8B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.82x | 37.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.42x | 19.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.40x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.58x | 17.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.81x | 8.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.68x | 4.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.08x | 39.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $15 for CDE. CDE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HL's 0.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs CDE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.2% | +22.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.2% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.5% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.9% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$188M | $57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $554M | $242M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $365M | $299M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 47.33x | 19.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,082 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,303 for CDE. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +268.5% total return vs CDE's +223.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDE at 74.6% vs HL's 43.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.8% | -3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +223.7% | +268.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +432.4% | +195.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.0% | +150.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.2% | +327.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +74.6% | +43.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HL is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDE currently trades 67.5% from its 52-week high vs HL's 53.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.81x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.77 | $34.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.51 | $4.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.5% | +53.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.0 | 37.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21.8M | 15.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CDE as "Buy" and HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 54.7% upside for CDE (target: $29) vs 31.3% for HL (target: $24).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.00 | $23.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.0% |
CDE leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
CDE vs HL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CDE or HL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 53. 0% for Hecla Mining Company (HL). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 8x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CDE or HL?
On trailing P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the cheapest at 20. 8x versus Hecla Mining Company at 37. 0x. On forward P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CDE or HL?
Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.
8%, compared to +103. 0% for Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +327. 7% versus CDE's +137. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CDE or HL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
26β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning CDE is approximately 44% more volatile than HL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 12% for Hecla Mining Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CDE or HL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 53. 0% for Hecla Mining Company (HL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 500. 0% for Coeur Mining, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CDE or HL?
Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus 22. 6% for Hecla Mining Company — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus 36. 3% for CDE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CDE or HL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Hecla Mining Company — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 54. 7% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CDE or HL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CDE or HL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
26), +327. 7% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HL: +327. 7%, CDE: +137. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CDE and HL?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.