REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CDP vs RTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
CDP vs RTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $3.60B | $238.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $777M | $90.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $156M | $7.26B |
| Gross Margin | 31.9% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | 30.1% | 10.4% |
| Forward P/E | 23.7x | 25.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.81B | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $275M | $7.43B |
CDP vs RTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| COPT Defense Proper… (CDP) | 100 | 127.1 | +27.1% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 273.9 | +173.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CDP vs RTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CDP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 3.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, current ratio 1.64x
- Beta 0.37, yield 3.8%, current ratio 1.64x
RTX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 39.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- 231.2% 10Y total return vs CDP's 60.4%
- 9.7% revenue growth vs CDP's 1.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.7% revenue growth vs CDP's 1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.7x vs 25.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.1% margin vs RTX's 8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs RTX's 0.51 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RTX's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.0% vs CDP's +24.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs CDP's 3.5%, ROIC 6.7% vs 4.3% |
CDP vs RTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CDP vs RTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $90.4B annually — 116.4x CDP's $777M. CDP is the more profitable business, keeping 20.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RTX's 8.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $777M | $90.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $399M | $13.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $156M | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $215M | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +10.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +32.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.7x trailing earnings, CDP trades at a 34% valuation discount to RTX's 35.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CDP's 15.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RTX's 21.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $238.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.1B | $270.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.68x | 35.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.69x | 25.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.62x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.64x | 20.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.71x | 2.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.26x | 3.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.18x | 29.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RTX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RTX delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $10 for CDP. RTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CDP's 1.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RTX scores 8/9 vs CDP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.9% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.77x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $32.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $275M | $7.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.80x | 5.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RTX five years ago would be worth $22,270 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,490 for CDP. Over the past 12 months, RTX leads with a +40.0% total return vs CDP's +24.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RTX at 24.5% vs CDP's 13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.6% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.6% | +40.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.1% | +92.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.9% | +122.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.4% | +231.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.5% | +24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
CDP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CDP is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RTX's 0.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDP currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs RTX's 82.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.37x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.29 | $214.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.99 | $126.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +82.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 29.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 896K | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CDP and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CDP as "Buy" and RTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.2% upside for RTX (target: $225) vs 13.5% for CDP (target: $36). For income investors, CDP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.80% vs RTX's 1.49%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.00 | $224.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.21 | $2.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
CDP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RTX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CDP vs RTX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CDP or RTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger pick with 9.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for COPT Defense Properties (CDP). COPT Defense Properties (CDP) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E (23. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate COPT Defense Properties (CDP) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CDP or RTX?
On trailing P/E, COPT Defense Properties (CDP) is the cheapest at 23.
7x versus RTX Corporation at 35. 6x. On forward P/E, COPT Defense Properties is actually cheaper at 23. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CDP or RTX?
Over the past 5 years, RTX Corporation (RTX) delivered a total return of +122.
7%, compared to +34. 9% for COPT Defense Properties (CDP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RTX returned +231. 2% versus CDP's +60. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CDP or RTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), COPT Defense Properties (CDP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
37β versus RTX Corporation's 0. 51β — meaning RTX is approximately 39% more volatile than CDP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RTX Corporation (RTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 177% for COPT Defense Properties — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CDP or RTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RTX Corporation (RTX) is pulling ahead at 9.
7% versus 1. 4% for COPT Defense Properties (CDP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RTX Corporation grew EPS 39. 7% year-over-year, compared to 8. 9% for COPT Defense Properties. Over a 3-year CAGR, RTX leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CDP or RTX?
COPT Defense Properties (CDP) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
9% net margin versus 7. 6% for RTX Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDP leads at 30. 2% versus 10. 0% for RTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RTX leads at 20. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CDP or RTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, COPT Defense Properties (CDP) trades at 23.
7x forward P/E versus 25. 5x for RTX Corporation — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RTX: 27. 2% to $224. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — CDP or RTX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
COPT Defense Properties (CDP) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 5% for RTX Corporation (RTX).
09Is CDP or RTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, COPT Defense Properties (CDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
37), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CDP: +60. 4%, RTX: +231. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CDP and RTX?
These companies operate in different sectors (CDP (Real Estate) and RTX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CDP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.