Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CDXS vs GEVO vs BEAM vs TRMK vs NUVB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Biotechnology
Banks - Regional
Biotechnology
CDXS vs GEVO vs BEAM vs TRMK vs NUVB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Chemicals - Specialty | Biotechnology | Banks - Regional | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $234M | $493M | $3.23B | $2.64B | $1.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $70M | $174M | $132M | $1.12B | $143M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $-11M | $-65M | $224M | $-146M |
| Gross Margin | 79.5% | 23.4% | -64.2% | 71.0% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -54.5% | -4.6% | -281.0% | 25.5% | -105.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 11.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $73M | $168M | $294M | $1.12B | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $1M | $295M | $668M | $164M |
CDXS vs GEVO vs BEAM vs TRMK vs NUVB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codexis, Inc. (CDXS) | 100 | 18.7 | -81.3% |
| Gevo, Inc. (GEVO) | 100 | 162.4 | +62.4% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 125.3 | +25.3% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 191.2 | +91.2% |
| Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CDXS vs GEVO vs BEAM vs TRMK vs NUVB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CDXS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GEVO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth 58.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 415.1%
- 8.5% revenue growth vs CDXS's 18.6%
Among these 5 stocks, BEAM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TRMK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 2.2%
- 127.7% 10Y total return vs BEAM's 67.8%
- 20.0% margin vs NUVB's -102.1%
- Beta 0.94 vs CDXS's 2.31, lower leverage
NUVB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.04, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 6.95x
- Beta 2.04, current ratio 6.95x
- +136.3% vs CDXS's +13.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.5% revenue growth vs CDXS's 18.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs NUVB's -102.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs CDXS's 2.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.3% vs CDXS's +13.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs CDXS's -32.6%, ROIC 7.1% vs -31.9% |
CDXS vs GEVO vs BEAM vs TRMK vs NUVB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CDXS vs GEVO vs BEAM vs TRMK vs NUVB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMK leads in 4 of 6 categories
NUVB leads 1 • CDXS leads 0 • GEVO leads 0 • BEAM leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 15.9x CDXS's $70M. TRMK is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUVB's -102.1%. On growth, NUVB holds the edge at +26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $70M | $174M | $132M | $1.1B | $143M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$30M | $18M | -$355M | $323M | -$145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | -$11M | -$65M | $224M | -$146M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | -$35M | -$384M | $230M | -$126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.5% | +23.4% | -64.2% | +71.0% | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -54.5% | -4.6% | -2.8% | +25.5% | -105.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -62.5% | -6.6% | -49.2% | +20.0% | -102.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -33.9% | -19.9% | -2.9% | +20.7% | -88.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.3% | +47.5% | -100.0% | — | +26.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +184.6% | +3.8% | +26.6% | +5.4% | +106.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMK leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TRMK's 9.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GEVO's 102.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $234M | $493M | $3.2B | $2.6B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $257M | $659M | $3.2B | $3.1B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.16x | -14.50x | -38.85x | 12.13x | -8.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 11.50x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.50x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 102.12x | — | 9.49x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.33x | 3.07x | 23.14x | 2.36x | 26.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.45x | 1.01x | 2.51x | 1.28x | 5.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 11.39x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMK delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-91 for CDXS. NUVB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CDXS's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRMK scores 7/9 vs NUVB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -90.5% | -2.4% | -5.9% | +10.8% | -44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.6% | -1.7% | -4.6% | +1.2% | -23.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -31.9% | -2.8% | -31.1% | +7.1% | -54.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -30.9% | -3.1% | -33.3% | +3.2% | -42.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.45x | 0.36x | 0.24x | 0.53x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22M | $166M | -$1M | $448M | -$154M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $1M | $295M | $668M | $164M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $168M | $294M | $1.1B | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.96x | -0.04x | 1.08x | 0.75x | -162.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMK five years ago would be worth $14,756 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,334 for CDXS. Over the past 12 months, NUVB leads with a +136.3% total return vs CDXS's +13.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVB at 43.8% vs CDXS's -8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +60.2% | -1.5% | +16.0% | +15.5% | -43.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.2% | +88.0% | +93.9% | +32.5% | +136.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.3% | +65.0% | -5.6% | +118.5% | +197.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.7% | -65.2% | -55.6% | +47.6% | -58.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.6% | -98.6% | +67.8% | +127.7% | -51.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.9% | +18.2% | -1.9% | +29.8% | +43.8% |
Risk & Volatility
TRMK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRMK is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDXS's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs NUVB's 49.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.31x | 1.64x | 2.14x | 0.94x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.87 | $2.97 | $36.44 | $45.99 | $9.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.96 | $1.01 | $15.35 | $33.39 | $1.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.7% | +68.4% | +86.4% | +97.6% | +49.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.4 | 53.5 | 60.9 | 56.0 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 4.5M | 2.0M | 392K | 4.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CDXS as "Buy", GEVO as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold", NUVB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 157.3% upside for NUVB (target: $12) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). TRMK is the only dividend payer here at 2.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | $3.50 | $40.83 | $45.50 | $12.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 14 | 27 | 9 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.97 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.0% | 0.0% |
TRMK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NUVB leads in 1 (Total Returns).
CDXS vs GEVO vs BEAM vs TRMK vs NUVB: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CDXS or GEVO or BEAM or TRMK or NUVB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gevo, Inc.
(GEVO) is the stronger pick with 849. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 6% for Codexis, Inc. (CDXS). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Codexis, Inc. (CDXS) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CDXS or GEVO or BEAM or TRMK or NUVB?
Over the past 5 years, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) delivered a total return of +47.
6%, compared to -86. 7% for Codexis, Inc. (CDXS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMK returned +127. 7% versus GEVO's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CDXS or GEVO or BEAM or TRMK or NUVB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
94β versus Codexis, Inc. 's 2. 31β — meaning CDXS is approximately 144% more volatile than TRMK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 145% for Codexis, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CDXS or GEVO or BEAM or TRMK or NUVB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gevo, Inc.
(GEVO) is pulling ahead at 849. 3% versus 18. 6% for Codexis, Inc. (CDXS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beam Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 82. 3% year-over-year, compared to 1. 9% for Trustmark Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEVO leads at 415. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CDXS or GEVO or BEAM or TRMK or NUVB?
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
0% net margin versus -325. 3% for Nuvation Bio Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus -338. 7% for NUVB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NUVB leads at 86. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CDXS or GEVO or BEAM or TRMK or NUVB more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NUVB: 157.
3% to $12. 40.
07Which pays a better dividend — CDXS or GEVO or BEAM or TRMK or NUVB?
In this comparison, TRMK (2.
2% yield) pays a dividend. CDXS, GEVO, BEAM, NUVB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CDXS or GEVO or BEAM or TRMK or NUVB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
94), 2. 2% yield, +127. 7% 10Y return). Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRMK: +127. 7%, NUVB: -51. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CDXS and GEVO and BEAM and TRMK and NUVB?
These companies operate in different sectors (CDXS (Healthcare) and GEVO (Basic Materials) and BEAM (Healthcare) and TRMK (Financial Services) and NUVB (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
TRMK pays a dividend while CDXS, GEVO, BEAM, NUVB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.