Regulated Water
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CDZI vs GWRS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
CDZI vs GWRS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Water | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $361M | $206M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $56M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33M | $3M |
| Gross Margin | 32.5% | 92.8% |
| Operating Margin | -155.4% | 12.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 53.0x |
| Total Debt | $86M | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $4M |
CDZI vs GWRS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cadiz Inc. (CDZI) | 100 | 43.3 | -56.7% |
| Global Water Resour… (GWRS) | 100 | 66.6 | -33.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CDZI vs GWRS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CDZI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 382.6%, EPS growth 5.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 157.3%
- 382.6% revenue growth vs GWRS's 5.8%
- +60.7% vs GWRS's -27.3%
GWRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 4.2%
- 39.8% 10Y total return vs CDZI's -27.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 8.9%, current ratio 0.76x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 382.6% revenue growth vs GWRS's 5.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.3% margin vs CDZI's -206.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs CDZI's 1.53, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CDZI's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.7% vs GWRS's -27.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.6% ROA vs CDZI's -25.8%, ROIC 4.2% vs -17.5% |
CDZI vs GWRS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CDZI vs GWRS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GWRS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GWRS is the larger business by revenue, generating $56M annually — 3.5x CDZI's $16M. GWRS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDZI's -2.1%. On growth, CDZI holds the edge at +28.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $56M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$23M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | $3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$30M | -$55M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +92.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -155.4% | +12.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -188.6% | -99.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.7% | +2.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | -3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GWRS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $361M | $206M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $430M | $209M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.04x | 65.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 53.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.71x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 37.57x | 3.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.71x | 2.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GWRS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GWRS delivers a 3.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-119 for CDZI. GWRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CDZI's 2.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CDZI scores 5/9 vs GWRS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -119.0% | +3.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.8% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -17.5% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.0% | +1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.53x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $69M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $86M | $8M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.90x | 1.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CDZI and GWRS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GWRS five years ago would be worth $5,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,962 for CDZI. Over the past 12 months, CDZI leads with a +60.7% total return vs GWRS's -27.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDZI at 0.8% vs GWRS's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.4% | -13.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.7% | -27.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.6% | -27.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.4% | -47.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.0% | +39.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.8% | -10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CDZI and GWRS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GWRS is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDZI's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDZI currently trades 68.8% from its 52-week high vs GWRS's 64.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.53x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.96 | $11.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.58 | $6.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.8% | +64.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 30.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 638K | 81K |
Analyst Outlook
GWRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CDZI as "Buy" and GWRS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 108.8% upside for CDZI (target: $10) vs 74.6% for GWRS (target: $13). For income investors, GWRS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.23% vs CDZI's 1.55%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $12.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.07 | $0.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GWRS leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
CDZI vs GWRS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CDZI or GWRS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cadiz Inc.
(CDZI) is the stronger pick with 382. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) offers the better valuation at 65. 1x trailing P/E (53. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cadiz Inc. (CDZI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CDZI or GWRS?
Over the past 5 years, Global Water Resources, Inc.
(GWRS) delivered a total return of -47. 8%, compared to -60. 4% for Cadiz Inc. (CDZI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GWRS returned +39. 8% versus CDZI's -27. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CDZI or GWRS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Global Water Resources, Inc.
(GWRS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Cadiz Inc. 's 1. 53β — meaning CDZI is approximately 116% more volatile than GWRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for Cadiz Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CDZI or GWRS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadiz Inc.
(CDZI) is pulling ahead at 382. 6% versus 5. 8% for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cadiz Inc. grew EPS 5. 4% year-over-year, compared to -54. 2% for Global Water Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDZI leads at 157. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CDZI or GWRS?
Global Water Resources, Inc.
(GWRS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 3% net margin versus -324. 1% for Cadiz Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GWRS leads at 12. 8% versus -242. 0% for CDZI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GWRS leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CDZI or GWRS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDZI: 108.
8% to $10. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CDZI or GWRS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 5% for Cadiz Inc. (CDZI).
08Is CDZI or GWRS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Global Water Resources, Inc.
(GWRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), 4. 2% yield). Cadiz Inc. (CDZI) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GWRS: +39. 8%, CDZI: -27. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CDZI and GWRS?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CDZI is a small-cap high-growth stock; GWRS is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.