Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs Walmart Inc. (WMT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WMT | 4.7% revenue growth vs CELH's 2.9% |
| Value | CELH | Lower P/E (34.6x vs 43.8x), PEG 0.65 vs 3.98 |
| Quality / Margins | WMT | 3.3% net margin vs CELH's 3.0% |
| Stability / Safety | WMT | Beta 0.53 vs CELH's 0.92 |
| Dividends | WMT | 0.7% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs CELH's 0.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CELH | +108.7% vs WMT's +30.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WMT | 7.9% ROA vs CELH's 1.2%, ROIC 14.7% vs 33.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Celsius Holdings is a functional energy drink company that develops and markets fitness-focused beverages with metabolism-boosting properties. It generates revenue primarily through direct-to-store distribution to retailers — including supermarkets, convenience stores, and mass merchants — with its core Celsius Originals line driving the majority of sales. The company's key advantage is its patented MetaPlus formula and positioning in the fast-growing fitness energy segment, which has created strong brand loyalty among health-conscious consumers.
Walmart is the world's largest retailer operating a vast network of physical stores and e-commerce platforms. It generates revenue primarily through retail sales — with Walmart U.S. contributing about 65% of total revenue, Walmart International around 20%, and Sam's Club membership warehouse clubs roughly 15%. Its key competitive advantage is massive scale and supply chain efficiency, enabling everyday low prices that competitors struggle to match.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
WMT leads in 5 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CELH leads in 1 (Financial Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 330.7x CELH's $2.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.3% (WMT) to 3.0% (CELH). On growth, CELH holds the edge at +172.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CELHCelsius Holdings,… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $119M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $64M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $524M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.4% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +172.9% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
At 46.9x trailing earnings, WMT trades at a 61% valuation discount to CELH's 119.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CELH offers better value at 2.24x vs WMT's 4.26x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | CELHCelsius Holdings,… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.8B | $1.02T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.9B | $1.08T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 119.13x | 46.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.58x | 43.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.24x | 4.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 79.45x | 24.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.19x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.39x | 10.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 57.70x | 24.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $2 for CELH. CELH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs CELH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CELHCelsius Holdings,… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +33.9% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.7% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$870M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $890M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.94x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $30,135 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,580 for CELH. Over the past 12 months, CELH leads with a +108.7% total return vs WMT's +30.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 40.2% vs CELH's 21.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CELHCelsius Holdings,… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.3% | +13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +108.7% | +30.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.1% | +175.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.8% | +201.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8835.0% | +512.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.0% | +40.2% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CELH's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs CELH's 80.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CELHCelsius Holdings,… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.74 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.04 | $79.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.3% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.5 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 29.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CELH as "Buy" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.6% upside for CELH (target: $70) vs 6.5% for WMT (target: $136). For income investors, WMT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.73% vs CELH's 0.22%.
| Metric | CELHCelsius Holdings,… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.00 | $136.31 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.8% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celsius Holdings, I… (CELH) | 100 | 2,605.08 | +2505.1% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 345.67 | +245.7% |
Walmart Inc. (WMT) returned +201% over 5 years vs Celsius Holdings, I… (CELH)'s +146%. A $10,000 investment in WMT 5 years ago would be worth $30,135 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celsius Holdings, I… (CELH) | $36M | $1.4B | +3648.6% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | $485.9B | $713.2B | +46.8% |
Walmart Inc.'s revenue grew from $485.9B (2017) to $713.2B (2026) — a 4.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celsius Holdings, I… (CELH) | -22.8% | 10.7% | +147.0% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 2.8% | 3.1% | +9.3% |
Walmart Inc.'s net margin went from 3% (2017) to 3% (2026).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celsius Holdings, I… (CELH) | 30.2 | 58.5 | +93.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 22.5 | 46.9 | +108.4% |
Celsius Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 30x–457x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~119x. Walmart Inc. has traded in a 23x–53x P/E range over 10 years; current trailing P/E is ~47x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celsius Holdings, I… (CELH) | -0.06 | 0.45 | +828.2% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 1.46 | 2.73 | +87.0% |
Walmart Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.46 (2017) to $2.73 (2026) — a 7% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Celsius Holdings, Inc. generated $240M FCF in 2024 (+340% vs 2021). Walmart Inc. generated $42B FCF in 2026 (+61% vs 2021).
CELH vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CELH or WMT a better buy right now?
Walmart Inc. (WMT) offers the better valuation at 46.9x trailing P/E (43.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CELH or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the cheapest at 46.9x versus Celsius Holdings, Inc. at 119.1x. On forward P/E, Celsius Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 34.6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Celsius Holdings, Inc. wins at 0.65x versus Walmart Inc.'s 3.98x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CELH or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc. (WMT) delivered a total return of +201.3%, compared to +145.8% for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth approximately $30K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CELH returned +88.4% versus WMT's +512.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CELH or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.53β versus Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s 0.92β — meaning CELH is approximately 74% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CELH or WMT?
Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) is the more profitable company, earning 10.7% net margin versus 3.1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 10.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CELH leads at 11.5% versus 4.2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CELH leads at 50.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CELH or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.65x versus Walmart Inc.'s 3.98x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) trades at 34.6x forward P/E versus 43.8x for Walmart Inc. — 9.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CELH: 30.6% to $70.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CELH or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Walmart Inc. (WMT) offers the highest yield at 0.7%, versus 0.2% for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH).
08Is CELH or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.53), 0.7% yield, +512.5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +512.5%, CELH: +88.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CELH and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. WMT pays a dividend while CELH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.