CELH vs WMT vs COST vs SFM

For growth investors, Celsius Holdings, Inc.

(CELH) is the stronger pick with 85. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (14. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.

(SFM) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus Celsius Holdings, Inc. at 137. 0x. On forward P/E, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Celsius Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 46x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.

(SFM) delivered a total return of +213. 8%, compared to +109. 4% for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CELH returned +41. 3% versus SFM's +203. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Celsius Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning CELH is approximately 1007% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 139% for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Celsius Holdings, Inc.

(CELH) is pulling ahead at 85. 5% versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. grew EPS 41. 6% year-over-year, compared to -44. 4% for Celsius Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CELH leads at 56. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.

(SFM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus 2. 9% for Costco Wholesale Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CELH leads at 18. 6% versus 3. 8% for COST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CELH leads at 50. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 46x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) trades at 14. 5x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Costco Wholesale Corporation — 35. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CELH: 72. 2% to $59. 00.

In this comparison, WMT (0.

7% yield), COST (0. 5% yield), CELH (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. SFM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, CELH: +41. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CELH is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; COST is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SFM is a small-cap deep-value stock. WMT pays a dividend while CELH, COST, SFM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.