Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSUR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CELZ
Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-88.2%
VCEL
Vericel Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.79B
5Y Perf.+132.7%
MDXG
MiMedx Group, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$548M
5Y Perf.+0.3%
OSUR
OraSure Technologies, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$225M
5Y Perf.-79.0%

CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSUR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CELZ logoCELZ
VCEL logoVCEL
MDXG logoMDXG
OSUR logoOSUR
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Instruments & Supplies
Market Cap$6M$1.79B$548M$225M
Revenue (TTM)$6K$292M$389M$85M
Net Income (TTM)$-6M$21M$31M$-53M
Gross Margin-452.4%74.8%81.0%38.8%
Operating Margin-1013.8%5.4%10.2%-58.6%
Forward P/E72.2x295.2x
Total Debt$0.00$98M$23M$13M
Cash & Equiv.$7M$100M$166M$199K

CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSURLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CELZ
VCEL
MDXG
OSUR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Creative Medical Te… (CELZ)10011.8-88.2%
Vericel Corporation (VCEL)100232.7+132.7%
MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG)100100.3+0.3%
OraSure Technologie… (OSUR)10021.0-79.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSUR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MDXG leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. VCEL also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CELZ
Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CELZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 1.42, current ratio 25.97x
  • +18.7% vs MDXG's -47.1%
Best for: defensive
VCEL
Vericel Corporation
The Growth Play

VCEL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.9%
  • 12.1% 10Y total return vs MDXG's -48.5%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MDXG
MiMedx Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

MDXG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.22
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 8.8%, current ratio 4.32x
  • 20.0% revenue growth vs CELZ's -45.5%
  • 7.9% margin vs CELZ's -993.6%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
OSUR
OraSure Technologies, Inc.
The Secondary Option

OSUR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMDXG logoMDXG20.0% revenue growth vs CELZ's -45.5%
ValueVCEL logoVCELBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsMDXG logoMDXG7.9% margin vs CELZ's -993.6%
Stability / SafetyMDXG logoMDXGBeta 1.22 vs VCEL's 1.47, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CELZ logoCELZ+18.7% vs MDXG's -47.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MDXG logoMDXG9.7% ROA vs CELZ's -85.2%, ROIC 42.3% vs -12.6%

CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CELZCreative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

VCELVericel Corporation
FY 2025
MACI Implants And Kits
100.0%$240M
MDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Surgical
100.0%$142M
OSUROraSure Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Product And Services
94.8%$109M
Other Revenues
5.2%$6M

CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSUR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMDXGLAGGINGOSUR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — VCEL and MDXG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MDXG is the larger business by revenue, generating $389M annually — 64902.7x CELZ's $6,000. MDXG is the more profitable business, keeping 7.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CELZ's -993.6%. On growth, VCEL holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCELZ logoCELZCreative Medical …VCEL logoVCELVericel Corporati…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.OSUR logoOSUROraSure Technolog…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6,000$292M$389M$85M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$6M$25M$53M-$45M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$6M$21M$31M-$53M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6M$58M$66M-$33M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-4.5%+74.8%+81.0%+38.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-1013.8%+5.4%+10.2%-58.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-993.6%+7.3%+7.9%-61.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-978.1%+19.8%+17.0%-38.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%-33.1%-99.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.0%+47.8%-2.4%-52.4%
Evenly matched — VCEL and MDXG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MDXG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 11.5x trailing earnings, MDXG trades at a 89% valuation discount to VCEL's 109.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MDXG's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VCEL's 79.8x.

MetricCELZ logoCELZCreative Medical …VCEL logoVCELVericel Corporati…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.OSUR logoOSUROraSure Technolog…
Market CapShares × price$6M$1.8B$548M$225M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$1M$1.8B$405M$238M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.91x109.78x11.53x-3.33x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.72.16x295.20x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.78x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple79.78x5.14x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue984.90x6.48x1.31x1.96x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.73x5.16x2.15x0.67x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF72.30x7.51x
MDXG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MDXG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MDXG delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-89 for CELZ. OSUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VCEL's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VCEL scores 8/9 vs OSUR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCELZ logoCELZCreative Medical …VCEL logoVCELVericel Corporati…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.OSUR logoOSUROraSure Technolog…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-88.9%+6.4%+12.9%-15.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-85.2%+4.6%+9.7%-12.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-12.6%+2.5%+42.3%-20.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-86.8%+2.7%+25.7%-16.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93853
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.28x0.09x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$7M-$2M-$144M$13M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$100M$166M$199,278
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$98M$23M$13M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense91.80x25.32x
MDXG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

VCEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in VCEL five years ago would be worth $6,672 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $129 for CELZ. Over the past 12 months, CELZ leads with a +18.7% total return vs MDXG's -47.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VCEL at 2.1% vs CELZ's -29.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCELZ logoCELZCreative Medical …VCEL logoVCELVericel Corporati…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.OSUR logoOSUROraSure Technolog…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+16.2%-1.3%-43.1%+31.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+18.7%-13.2%-47.1%+12.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-64.4%+6.5%-36.6%-55.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.7%-33.3%-62.9%-68.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+1205.9%-48.5%-53.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-29.2%+2.1%-14.1%-23.5%
VCEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MDXG and OSUR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MDXG is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VCEL's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSUR currently trades 81.9% from its 52-week high vs CELZ's 36.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCELZ logoCELZCreative Medical …VCEL logoVCELVericel Corporati…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.OSUR logoOSUROraSure Technolog…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.40x1.40x1.21x1.43x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.25$45.97$7.99$3.82
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.50$28.95$3.02$2.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+36.6%+76.4%+46.2%+81.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.358.249.347.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded53K626K1.4M473K
Evenly matched — MDXG and OSUR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: VCEL as "Buy", MDXG as "Buy", OSUR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 171.0% upside for MDXG (target: $10) vs 27.8% for OSUR (target: $4).

MetricCELZ logoCELZCreative Medical …VCEL logoVCELVericel Corporati…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.OSUR logoOSUROraSure Technolog…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$52.67$10.00$4.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts141513
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.6%+6.7%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MDXG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). VCEL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallMiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSUR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MiMedx Group, Inc.

(MDXG) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -45. 5% for Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. (CELZ). MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (295. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vericel Corporation (VCEL) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR?

On trailing P/E, MiMedx Group, Inc.

(MDXG) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Vericel Corporation at 109. 8x. On forward P/E, Vericel Corporation is actually cheaper at 72. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR?

Over the past 5 years, Vericel Corporation (VCEL) delivered a total return of -33.

3%, compared to -98. 7% for Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. (CELZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VCEL returned +1144% versus CELZ's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MiMedx Group, Inc.

(MDXG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus OraSure Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning OSUR is approximately 18% more volatile than MDXG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 28% for Vericel Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MiMedx Group, Inc.

(MDXG) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -45. 5% for Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. (CELZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vericel Corporation grew EPS 60. 0% year-over-year, compared to -261. 5% for OraSure Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VCEL leads at 18. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR?

MiMedx Group, Inc.

(MDXG) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 6% net margin versus -999. 2% for Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDXG leads at 15. 3% versus -1003. 2% for CELZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDXG leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Vericel Corporation (VCEL) trades at 72.

2x forward P/E versus 295. 2x for MiMedx Group, Inc. — 223. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MDXG: 171. 0% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Vericel Corporation (VCEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1144% 10Y return).

Both have compounded well over 10 years (VCEL: +1144%, CELZ: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CELZ and VCEL and MDXG and OSUR?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CELZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VCEL is a small-cap high-growth stock; MDXG is a small-cap high-growth stock; OSUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CELZ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VCEL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MDXG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OSUR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CELZ and VCEL and MDXG and OSUR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CELZ: -45.5% · VCEL: 30.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.