Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $6M | $1.79B | $548M | $225M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6K | $292M | $389M | $85M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $21M | $31M | $-53M |
| Gross Margin | -452.4% | 74.8% | 81.0% | 38.8% |
| Operating Margin | -1013.8% | 5.4% | 10.2% | -58.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 72.2x | 295.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $98M | $23M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $100M | $166M | $199K |
CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Medical Te… (CELZ) | 100 | 11.8 | -88.2% |
| Vericel Corporation (VCEL) | 100 | 232.7 | +132.7% |
| MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) | 100 | 100.3 | +0.3% |
| OraSure Technologie… (OSUR) | 100 | 21.0 | -79.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CELZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 1.42, current ratio 25.97x
- +18.7% vs MDXG's -47.1%
VCEL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.9%
- 12.1% 10Y total return vs MDXG's -48.5%
- Better valuation composite
MDXG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.22
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 8.8%, current ratio 4.32x
- 20.0% revenue growth vs CELZ's -45.5%
- 7.9% margin vs CELZ's -993.6%
OSUR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs CELZ's -45.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.9% margin vs CELZ's -993.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.22 vs VCEL's 1.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.7% vs MDXG's -47.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs CELZ's -85.2%, ROIC 42.3% vs -12.6% |
CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MDXG leads in 2 of 6 categories
VCEL leads 1 • CELZ leads 0 • OSUR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VCEL and MDXG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDXG is the larger business by revenue, generating $389M annually — 64902.7x CELZ's $6,000. MDXG is the more profitable business, keeping 7.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CELZ's -993.6%. On growth, VCEL holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6,000 | $292M | $389M | $85M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $25M | $53M | -$45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $21M | $31M | -$53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $58M | $66M | -$33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +74.8% | +81.0% | +38.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1013.8% | +5.4% | +10.2% | -58.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -993.6% | +7.3% | +7.9% | -61.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -978.1% | +19.8% | +17.0% | -38.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +30.1% | -33.1% | -99.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.0% | +47.8% | -2.4% | -52.4% |
Valuation Metrics
MDXG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, MDXG trades at a 89% valuation discount to VCEL's 109.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MDXG's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VCEL's 79.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $1.8B | $548M | $225M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $1.8B | $405M | $238M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.91x | 109.78x | 11.53x | -3.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 72.16x | 295.20x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.78x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 79.78x | 5.14x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 984.90x | 6.48x | 1.31x | 1.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 5.16x | 2.15x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 72.30x | 7.51x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MDXG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MDXG delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-89 for CELZ. OSUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VCEL's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VCEL scores 8/9 vs OSUR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -88.9% | +6.4% | +12.9% | -15.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -85.2% | +4.6% | +9.7% | -12.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.6% | +2.5% | +42.3% | -20.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -86.8% | +2.7% | +25.7% | -16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.28x | 0.09x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$2M | -$144M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $100M | $166M | $199,278 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $98M | $23M | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 91.80x | 25.32x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VCEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VCEL five years ago would be worth $6,672 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $129 for CELZ. Over the past 12 months, CELZ leads with a +18.7% total return vs MDXG's -47.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VCEL at 2.1% vs CELZ's -29.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.2% | -1.3% | -43.1% | +31.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.7% | -13.2% | -47.1% | +12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.4% | +6.5% | -36.6% | -55.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -33.3% | -62.9% | -68.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +1205.9% | -48.5% | -53.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.2% | +2.1% | -14.1% | -23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MDXG and OSUR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDXG is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VCEL's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSUR currently trades 81.9% from its 52-week high vs CELZ's 36.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.40x | 1.21x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.25 | $45.97 | $7.99 | $3.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.50 | $28.95 | $3.02 | $2.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.6% | +76.4% | +46.2% | +81.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.3 | 58.2 | 49.3 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 53K | 626K | 1.4M | 473K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VCEL as "Buy", MDXG as "Buy", OSUR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 171.0% upside for MDXG (target: $10) vs 27.8% for OSUR (target: $4).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $52.67 | $10.00 | $4.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +6.7% |
MDXG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). VCEL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CELZ vs VCEL vs MDXG vs OSUR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -45. 5% for Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. (CELZ). MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (295. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vericel Corporation (VCEL) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR?
On trailing P/E, MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Vericel Corporation at 109. 8x. On forward P/E, Vericel Corporation is actually cheaper at 72. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR?
Over the past 5 years, Vericel Corporation (VCEL) delivered a total return of -33.
3%, compared to -98. 7% for Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. (CELZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VCEL returned +1144% versus CELZ's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus OraSure Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning OSUR is approximately 18% more volatile than MDXG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 28% for Vericel Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -45. 5% for Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. (CELZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vericel Corporation grew EPS 60. 0% year-over-year, compared to -261. 5% for OraSure Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VCEL leads at 18. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR?
MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 6% net margin versus -999. 2% for Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDXG leads at 15. 3% versus -1003. 2% for CELZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDXG leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vericel Corporation (VCEL) trades at 72.
2x forward P/E versus 295. 2x for MiMedx Group, Inc. — 223. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MDXG: 171. 0% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CELZ or VCEL or MDXG or OSUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vericel Corporation (VCEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1144% 10Y return).
Both have compounded well over 10 years (VCEL: +1144%, CELZ: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CELZ and VCEL and MDXG and OSUR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CELZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VCEL is a small-cap high-growth stock; MDXG is a small-cap high-growth stock; OSUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.