Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CENN vs WKHS vs RIVN vs BLNK vs LCID
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Manufacturers
Engineering & Construction
Auto - Manufacturers
CENN vs WKHS vs RIVN vs BLNK vs LCID — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Engineering & Construction | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $3M | $32M | $17.56B | $91M | $2.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $11M | $5.53B | $106M | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-73M | $-64M | $-3.52B | $-126M | $-3.36B |
| Gross Margin | -12.8% | -236.8% | -1.7% | 26.0% | -145.0% |
| Operating Margin | -180.0% | -5.6% | -68.9% | -119.5% | -339.6% |
| Total Debt | $11M | $16M | $6.65B | $11M | $861M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $4M | $3.58B | $42M | $998M |
CENN vs WKHS vs RIVN vs BLNK vs LCID — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cenntro Electric Gr… (CENN) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Rivian Automotive, … (RIVN) | 100 | 11.9 | -88.1% |
| Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CENN vs WKHS vs RIVN vs BLNK vs LCID
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CENN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WKHS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.46
- Lower volatility, beta 1.46, Low D/E 36.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 1.46 vs BLNK's 2.96
- +236.1% vs CENN's -92.3%
RIVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.
- -85.9% 10Y total return vs LCID's -93.9%
- Beta 1.59, current ratio 2.33x
- -63.6% margin vs WKHS's -6.1%
- -23.5% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC -36.7% vs -109.7%
BLNK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -11.2%, EPS growth 38.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 82.3%
LCID ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 67.6% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 67.6% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -63.6% margin vs WKHS's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.46 vs BLNK's 2.96 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +236.1% vs CENN's -92.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -23.5% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC -36.7% vs -109.7% |
CENN vs WKHS vs RIVN vs BLNK vs LCID — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CENN vs WKHS vs RIVN vs BLNK vs LCID — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RIVN leads in 2 of 6 categories
BLNK leads 1 • CENN leads 1 • WKHS leads 0 • LCID leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RIVN is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 520.5x WKHS's $11M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -63.6% (RIVN) to -6.1% (WKHS). On growth, CENN holds the edge at +73.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $11M | $5.5B | $106M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | -$52M | -$3.2B | -$115M | -$3.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$73M | -$64M | -$3.5B | -$126M | -$3.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | -$33M | -$2.5B | -$47M | -$4.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -12.8% | -2.4% | -1.7% | +26.0% | -145.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -180.0% | -5.6% | -68.9% | -119.5% | -3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -6.1% | -63.6% | -118.7% | -3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -73.9% | -3.1% | -45.0% | -44.5% | -4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.8% | -5.0% | +11.4% | +11.7% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.4% | +95.9% | +31.3% | +99.9% | -44.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CENN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $32M | $17.6B | $91M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $44M | $20.6B | $60M | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.05x | -0.07x | -4.62x | -0.40x | -0.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 4.83x | 3.26x | 0.73x | 1.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.08x | 0.16x | 3.66x | 0.67x | 2.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RIVN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RIVN delivers a -69.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-70 in annual profit, vs $-198 for WKHS. BLNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RIVN's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RIVN scores 4/9 vs WKHS's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -108.2% | -198.1% | -69.6% | -131.9% | -193.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -66.2% | -60.6% | -23.5% | -66.7% | -40.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -36.2% | -77.6% | -36.7% | -109.7% | -98.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -43.0% | -107.9% | -29.5% | -77.3% | -49.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.37x | 1.45x | 0.09x | 1.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $12M | $3.1B | -$31M | -$137M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $4M | $3.6B | $42M | $998M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $16M | $6.7B | $11M | $861M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -73.88x | -3.84x | -27.31x | -9064.60x | -146.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RIVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RIVN five years ago would be worth $1,409 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8 for CENN. Over the past 12 months, WKHS leads with a +236.1% total return vs CENN's -92.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RIVN at 0.8% vs WKHS's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.4% | -34.7% | -26.9% | +7.2% | -45.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.3% | +236.1% | +11.6% | +4.8% | -73.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | -98.6% | +2.3% | -88.9% | -92.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -99.8% | -85.9% | -97.6% | -96.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.8% | -85.9% | -97.5% | -93.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.4% | -75.9% | +0.8% | -51.9% | -57.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WKHS and RIVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WKHS is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIVN currently trades 62.5% from its 52-week high vs CENN's 6.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 1.46x | 1.59x | 2.96x | 2.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.00 | $11.80 | $22.69 | $2.65 | $33.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $0.53 | $11.57 | $0.45 | $5.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.1% | +30.8% | +62.5% | +29.9% | +18.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 72.7 | 38.1 | 66.4 | 34.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 167K | 26.7M | 2.1M | 12.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RIVN as "Buy", LCID as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 131.4% upside for LCID (target: $14) vs 29.4% for RIVN (target: $18).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $18.36 | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 28 | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RIVN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BLNK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CENN vs WKHS vs RIVN vs BLNK vs LCID: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CENN or WKHS or RIVN or BLNK or LCID a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lucid Group, Inc.
(LCID) is the stronger pick with 67. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Analysts rate Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CENN or WKHS or RIVN or BLNK or LCID?
Over the past 5 years, Rivian Automotive, Inc.
(RIVN) delivered a total return of -85. 9%, compared to -99. 9% for Cenntro Electric Group Limited (CENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIVN returned -85. 9% versus CENN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CENN or WKHS or RIVN or BLNK or LCID?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Workhorse Group Inc.
(WKHS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 46β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 2. 96β — meaning BLNK is approximately 102% more volatile than WKHS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 145% for Rivian Automotive, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CENN or WKHS or RIVN or BLNK or LCID?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lucid Group, Inc.
(LCID) is pulling ahead at 67. 6% versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Workhorse Group Inc. grew EPS 65. 4% year-over-year, compared to -0. 2% for Cenntro Electric Group Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLNK leads at 82. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CENN or WKHS or RIVN or BLNK or LCID?
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
(RIVN) is the more profitable company, earning -67. 7% net margin versus -1538. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. — meaning it keeps -67. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RIVN leads at -66. 5% versus -1116. 7% for WKHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLNK leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CENN or WKHS or RIVN or BLNK or LCID?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CENN or WKHS or RIVN or BLNK or LCID better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Workhorse Group Inc.
(WKHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WKHS: -99. 8%, BLNK: -97. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CENN and WKHS and RIVN and BLNK and LCID?
These companies operate in different sectors (CENN (Consumer Cyclical) and WKHS (Consumer Cyclical) and RIVN (Consumer Cyclical) and BLNK (Industrials) and LCID (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WKHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RIVN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LCID is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.