Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CERT vs MEDP vs IQV vs CRL vs VEEV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
CERT vs MEDP vs IQV vs CRL vs VEEV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $1.03B | $12.19B | $29.95B | $8.97B | $27.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $419M | $2.68B | $16.63B | $4.02B | $3.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $460M | $1.39B | $-144M | $909M |
| Gross Margin | 61.5% | 29.1% | 26.1% | 32.9% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 21.0% | 13.9% | 10.7% | 28.7% |
| Forward P/E | 14.0x | 25.1x | 13.9x | 16.4x | 18.9x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $250M | $16.17B | $3.07B | $96M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $189M | $497M | $1.98B | $214M | $1.42B |
CERT vs MEDP vs IQV vs CRL vs VEEV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Certara, Inc. (CERT) | 100 | 18.6 | -81.4% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 306.6 | +206.6% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 98.5 | -1.5% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 72.7 | -27.3% |
| Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) | 100 | 61.4 | -38.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CERT vs MEDP vs IQV vs CRL vs VEEV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, CERT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MEDP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs VEEV's 5.2%
- 20.0% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
- 24.8% ROA vs CRL's -1.9%, ROIC 154.9% vs 6.3%
IQV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
- PEG 0.34 vs VEEV's 1.04
- Lower P/E (13.9x vs 18.9x), PEG 0.34 vs 1.04
CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +57.5% vs CERT's -44.9%
VEEV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 4.89x
- Beta 0.77, current ratio 4.89x
- 28.4% margin vs CRL's -3.6%
- Beta 0.77 vs CRL's 1.52, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.9x vs 18.9x), PEG 0.34 vs 1.04 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.4% margin vs CRL's -3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs CRL's 1.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.5% vs CERT's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs CRL's -1.9%, ROIC 154.9% vs 6.3% |
CERT vs MEDP vs IQV vs CRL vs VEEV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CERT vs MEDP vs IQV vs CRL vs VEEV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MEDP leads in 2 of 6 categories
VEEV leads 1 • CERT leads 1 • IQV leads 1 • CRL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VEEV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 39.7x CERT's $419M. VEEV is the more profitable business, keeping 28.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -3.6%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $419M | $2.7B | $16.6B | $4.0B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $78M | $577M | $3.5B | $832M | $956M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $460M | $1.4B | -$144M | $909M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $67M | $745M | $2.7B | $518M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.5% | +29.1% | +26.1% | +32.9% | +75.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +21.0% | +13.9% | +10.7% | +28.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | +17.2% | +8.3% | -3.6% | +28.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +27.8% | +16.1% | +12.9% | +43.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +26.5% | +8.4% | -0.8% | +16.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -191.0% | +16.6% | +15.0% | -33.2% | +23.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CERT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.5x trailing earnings, IQV trades at a 27% valuation discount to VEEV's 30.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.56x vs VEEV's 1.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $12.2B | $29.9B | $9.0B | $27.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $849M | $11.9B | $44.1B | $11.8B | $25.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -626.00x | 27.93x | 22.51x | -62.45x | 30.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.99x | 25.13x | 13.89x | 16.40x | 18.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.88x | 0.56x | — | 1.69x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.94x | 21.21x | 12.87x | 12.97x | 28.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.45x | 4.82x | 1.84x | 2.23x | 8.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 27.45x | 4.62x | 2.81x | 3.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.86x | 17.87x | 14.60x | 17.29x | 19.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CRL. CERT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CERT scores 6/9 vs CRL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.2% | +120.9% | +22.1% | -4.3% | +13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +24.8% | +4.7% | -1.9% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.5% | +154.9% | +8.7% | +6.3% | +12.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +65.7% | +11.0% | +8.1% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.55x | 2.44x | 0.95x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$178M | -$247M | $14.2B | $2.9B | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $189M | $497M | $2.0B | $214M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $250M | $16.2B | $3.1B | $96M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 3.10x | 3.72x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MEDP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $26,038 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,131 for CERT. Over the past 12 months, CRL leads with a +57.5% total return vs CERT's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 26.8% vs CERT's -35.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.4% | -25.3% | -21.7% | -10.2% | -23.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.9% | +47.8% | +20.7% | +57.5% | -28.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.3% | +103.7% | -7.0% | -4.3% | -5.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.7% | +160.4% | -23.7% | -46.0% | -35.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.6% | +1435.8% | +167.5% | +124.7% | +519.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.6% | +26.8% | -2.4% | -1.5% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CRL and VEEV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VEEV is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRL's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRL currently trades 79.4% from its 52-week high vs CERT's 45.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.26x | 1.33x | 1.52x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.88 | $628.92 | $247.05 | $228.88 | $310.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.19 | $284.10 | $134.65 | $113.89 | $148.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.1% | +67.9% | +71.4% | +79.4% | +53.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 41.5 | 58.4 | 60.8 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 372K | 1.6M | 803K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CERT as "Buy", MEDP as "Hold", IQV as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", VEEV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.4% upside for VEEV (target: $280) vs 13.0% for CRL (target: $205).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $498.86 | $225.63 | $205.43 | $280.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 19 | 44 | 36 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.2% | +7.5% | +4.2% | +4.0% | +0.6% |
MEDP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). VEEV leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CERT vs MEDP vs IQV vs CRL vs VEEV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CERT or MEDP or IQV or CRL or VEEV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 5x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Certara, Inc. (CERT) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CERT or MEDP or IQV or CRL or VEEV?
On trailing P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the cheapest at 22. 5x versus Veeva Systems Inc. at 30. 8x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 34x versus Veeva Systems Inc. 's 1. 04x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CERT or MEDP or IQV or CRL or VEEV?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +160. 4%, compared to -78. 7% for Certara, Inc. (CERT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1436% versus CERT's -83. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CERT or MEDP or IQV or CRL or VEEV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Veeva Systems Inc.
(VEEV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. 's 1. 52β — meaning CRL is approximately 96% more volatile than VEEV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Certara, Inc. (CERT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CERT or MEDP or IQV or CRL or VEEV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Certara, Inc. grew EPS 86. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CERT or MEDP or IQV or CRL or VEEV?
Veeva Systems Inc.
(VEEV) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VEEV leads at 28. 7% versus 5. 0% for CERT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VEEV leads at 75. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CERT or MEDP or IQV or CRL or VEEV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus Veeva Systems Inc. 's 1. 04x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 13. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 1x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VEEV: 67. 4% to $280. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — CERT or MEDP or IQV or CRL or VEEV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CERT or MEDP or IQV or CRL or VEEV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +1436% 10Y return). Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1436%, CRL: +124. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CERT and MEDP and IQV and CRL and VEEV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CERT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VEEV is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.