Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CET vs TPVG vs CSWC vs GAM vs GAIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
CET vs TPVG vs CSWC vs GAM vs GAIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.54B | $243M | $1.43B | $1.51B | $657M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $296M | $97M | $164M | $252M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $507M | $-12M | $103M | $202M | $130M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 83.5% | 66.5% | 100.0% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 97.2% | 77.9% | 48.5% | 97.5% | 72.7% |
| Forward P/E | 5.3x | 6.5x | 10.1x | 6.0x | 40.7x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $469M | $956M | $2M | $456M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $268K | $20M | $43M | $70K | $14M |
CET vs TPVG vs CSWC vs GAM vs GAIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central Securities … (CET) | 100 | 184.3 | +84.3% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
| Capital Southwest C… (CSWC) | 100 | 171.6 | +71.6% |
| General American In… (GAM) | 100 | 207.0 | +107.0% |
| Gladstone Investmen… (GAIN) | 100 | 148.9 | +48.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CET vs TPVG vs CSWC vs GAM vs GAIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CET is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 416.3%, EPS growth 28.7%
- 416.3% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -12.9%
- Lower P/E (5.3x vs 6.0x)
TPVG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
- NIM 7.4% vs CET's 0.2%
- 17.1% yield, vs CSWC's 10.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, CSWC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GAM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 31.80x
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs CET's 1.0% (lower = leaner)
- +39.3% vs TPVG's +19.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs CET's 1.0%
GAIN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 319.3% 10Y total return vs CET's 264.7%
- Beta 0.53, yield 10.0%, current ratio 3.69x
- Beta 0.53 vs CSWC's 0.84, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 416.3% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -12.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.3x vs 6.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs CET's 1.0% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs CSWC's 0.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 17.1% yield, vs CSWC's 10.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.3% vs TPVG's +19.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs CET's 1.0% |
CET vs TPVG vs CSWC vs GAM vs GAIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GAM leads in 2 of 6 categories
TPVG leads 1 • CET leads 1 • CSWC leads 0 • GAIN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GAM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CET is the larger business by revenue, generating $296M annually — 3.3x GAIN's $90M. GAM is the more profitable business, keeping 97.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CSWC's 43.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $296M | $97M | $164M | $252M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $507M | -$22M | $142M | $105,782 | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $507M | -$12M | $103M | $202M | $130M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $35M | -$69M | $0 | -$82M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +83.5% | +66.5% | +100.0% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +97.2% | +77.9% | +48.5% | +97.5% | +72.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +97.2% | +50.6% | +43.1% | +97.5% | +72.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | -58.7% | -132.6% | — | +126.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -42.5% | -2.3% | +113.3% | +5.8% | +58.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TPVG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 70% valuation discount to CSWC's 16.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CET's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSWC's 27.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $243M | $1.4B | $1.5B | $657M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $691M | $2.3B | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.26x | 4.91x | 16.32x | 6.02x | 9.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.50x | 10.06x | — | 40.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.36x | 9.13x | 27.43x | 6.17x | 16.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.20x | 2.50x | 8.71x | 6.01x | 7.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 0.68x | 1.39x | 0.91x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 41.35x | — | — | — | 5.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CET leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CET delivers a 30.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. GAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CET scores 7/9 vs CSWC's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.4% | -3.4% | +10.3% | +12.0% | +21.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +30.3% | -1.5% | +4.8% | +11.9% | +10.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.9% | +7.2% | +3.5% | +12.4% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.9% | +9.4% | +4.6% | +16.3% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.33x | 1.08x | 0.00x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$267,953 | $449M | $913M | $2M | $441M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $267,953 | $20M | $43M | $69,600 | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $469M | $956M | $2M | $456M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.02x | 2.91x | — | 1.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GAM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GAM five years ago would be worth $19,443 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,649 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, GAM leads with a +39.3% total return vs TPVG's +19.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GAM at 25.8% vs TPVG's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | -6.3% | +11.4% | +10.5% | +20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.1% | +19.3% | +34.0% | +39.3% | +30.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.4% | -3.4% | +75.8% | +99.2% | +56.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.6% | -13.5% | +51.4% | +94.4% | +72.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +264.7% | +93.3% | +234.2% | +195.4% | +319.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.6% | -1.2% | +20.7% | +25.8% | +16.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GAM and GAIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GAIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSWC's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GAM currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs TPVG's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.83x | 0.84x | 0.74x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $54.28 | $7.53 | $24.43 | $66.18 | $17.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.54 | $4.48 | $19.37 | $51.26 | $13.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +79.5% | +98.2% | +98.3% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.9 | 58.3 | 63.7 | 63.5 | 69.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 504K | 664K | 28K | 371K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TPVG and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TPVG as "Hold", CSWC as "Buy", GAIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs -9.1% for GAIN (target: $15). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs CET's 2.50%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 | $22.50 | — | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 10 | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +17.1% | +10.2% | — | +10.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 3 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.34 | $1.02 | $2.45 | — | $1.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GAM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TPVG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CET vs TPVG vs CSWC vs GAM vs GAIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CET or TPVG or CSWC or GAM or GAIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Central Securities Corp.
(CET) is the stronger pick with 416. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CET or TPVG or CSWC or GAM or GAIN?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Capital Southwest Corporation at 16. 3x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CET or TPVG or CSWC or GAM or GAIN?
Over the past 5 years, General American Investors Company, Inc.
(GAM) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -13. 5% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GAIN returned +319. 3% versus TPVG's +93. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CET or TPVG or CSWC or GAM or GAIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus Capital Southwest Corporation's 0. 84β — meaning CSWC is approximately 56% more volatile than GAIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, General American Investors Company, Inc. (GAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CET or TPVG or CSWC or GAM or GAIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Central Securities Corp.
(CET) is pulling ahead at 416. 3% versus -12. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -36. 1% for General American Investors Company, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CET or TPVG or CSWC or GAM or GAIN?
General American Investors Company, Inc.
(GAM) is the more profitable company, earning 97. 5% net margin versus 43. 1% for Capital Southwest Corporation — meaning it keeps 97. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAM leads at 97. 5% versus 48. 5% for CSWC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CET leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CET or TPVG or CSWC or GAM or GAIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 40. 7x for Gladstone Investment Corporation — 34. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — CET or TPVG or CSWC or GAM or GAIN?
In this comparison, TPVG (17.
1% yield), CSWC (10. 2% yield), GAIN (10. 0% yield), CET (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. GAM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CET or TPVG or CSWC or GAM or GAIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 10. 0% yield, +319. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GAIN: +319. 3%, GAM: +195. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CET and TPVG and CSWC and GAM and GAIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CET is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock; GAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; GAIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. CET, TPVG, CSWC, GAIN pay a dividend while GAM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.