Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CETX vs CODA vs LIQT vs CLFD vs DGII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Communication Equipment
Communication Equipment
CETX vs CODA vs LIQT vs CLFD vs DGII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $117K | $134M | $22M | $519M | $2.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $79M | $28M | $17M | $136M | $475M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $4M | $-9M | $-9M | $43M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 66.3% | 4.9% | 37.2% | 63.4% |
| Operating Margin | -0.0% | 17.4% | -50.0% | 1.4% | 13.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.5x | — | 72.1x | 26.9x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $395K | $12M | $9M | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $29M | — | $21M | $22M |
CETX vs CODA vs LIQT vs CLFD vs DGII — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cemtrex, Inc. (CETX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 212.5 | +112.5% |
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 271.1 | +171.1% |
| Digi International … (DGII) | 100 | 557.3 | +457.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CETX vs CODA vs LIQT vs CLFD vs DGII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CETX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.00
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs DGII's 463.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
LIQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.52 vs CETX's 3.10, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, CLFD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DGII ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.87 vs CODA's 5.24
- +121.0% vs CETX's -96.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs DGII's 1.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs LIQT's -53.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs CETX's 3.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +121.0% vs CETX's -96.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs CETX's -32.6%, ROIC 11.2% vs 1.7% |
CETX vs CODA vs LIQT vs CLFD vs DGII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CETX vs CODA vs LIQT vs CLFD vs DGII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 2 of 6 categories
CETX leads 2 • DGII leads 1 • LIQT leads 0 • CLFD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DGII is the larger business by revenue, generating $475M annually — 28.3x LIQT's $17M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $79M | $28M | $17M | $136M | $475M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $6M | -$6M | $6M | $90M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | $4M | -$9M | -$9M | $43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$721,474 | $7M | -$7M | $15M | $130M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +66.3% | +4.9% | +37.2% | +63.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +17.4% | -50.0% | +1.4% | +13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.9% | +14.8% | -53.3% | -6.3% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +24.6% | -39.3% | +10.8% | +27.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +28.8% | +53.6% | -27.1% | +25.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +96.8% | +3.0% | +69.4% | -142.5% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CETX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 32.2x trailing earnings, CODA trades at a 44% valuation discount to DGII's 57.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DGII offers better value at 1.85x vs CODA's 7.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $116,707 | $134M | $22M | $519M | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $106M | $34M | $506M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 32.16x | -2.59x | -64.64x | 57.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.45x | — | 72.10x | 26.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.51x | — | — | 1.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.32x | 17.85x | — | 61.46x | 27.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 5.05x | 1.35x | 3.46x | 5.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 2.30x | 2.14x | 2.05x | 3.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.20x | — | 21.01x | 22.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CETX's 2.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -67.6% | +7.2% | -70.0% | -3.4% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.6% | +6.6% | -29.5% | -3.0% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +11.2% | -31.1% | +0.6% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +8.1% | — | +0.8% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.15x | 0.01x | 1.17x | 0.03x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | -$28M | $12M | -$13M | $158M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $29M | — | $21M | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $394,932 | $12M | $9M | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.00x | — | -13.46x | 85.32x | 21.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DGII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DGII five years ago would be worth $34,712 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for CETX. Over the past 12 months, DGII leads with a +121.0% total return vs CETX's -96.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DGII at 25.7% vs CETX's -98.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.8% | +25.1% | +54.9% | +27.1% | +43.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.0% | +78.9% | +64.8% | +20.2% | +121.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +34.5% | -31.3% | +3.9% | +98.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +49.7% | -96.1% | -4.1% | +247.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | +844.4% | -90.9% | +106.7% | +463.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -98.2% | +10.4% | -11.8% | +1.3% | +25.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIQT and DGII each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIQT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CETX's 3.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DGII currently trades 88.9% from its 52-week high vs CETX's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.10x | 1.00x | 0.52x | 1.79x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.60 | $17.28 | $3.35 | $46.76 | $69.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.51 | $5.98 | $1.30 | $24.01 | $27.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.1% | +68.9% | +68.9% | +80.2% | +88.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.3 | 48.6 | 57.0 | 57.1 | 69.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.2M | 256K | 50K | 146K | 268K |
Analyst Outlook
CETX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CODA as "Buy", CLFD as "Buy", DGII as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for CODA (target: $14) vs -18.9% for DGII (target: $50).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 | — | $43.00 | $50.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | — | 8 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% | 0.0% |
CODA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CETX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CETX vs CODA vs LIQT vs CLFD vs DGII: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CETX or CODA or LIQT or CLFD or DGII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Digi International Inc. (DGII). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (22. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CETX or CODA or LIQT or CLFD or DGII?
On trailing P/E, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the cheapest at 32. 2x versus Digi International Inc. at 57. 4x. On forward P/E, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Digi International Inc. wins at 0. 87x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 5. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CETX or CODA or LIQT or CLFD or DGII?
Over the past 5 years, Digi International Inc.
(DGII) delivered a total return of +247. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for Cemtrex, Inc. (CETX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus CETX's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CETX or CODA or LIQT or CLFD or DGII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Cemtrex, Inc. 's 3. 10β — meaning CETX is approximately 492% more volatile than LIQT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Cemtrex, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CETX or CODA or LIQT or CLFD or DGII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus 1. 5% for Digi International Inc. (DGII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digi International Inc. grew EPS 77. 0% year-over-year, compared to -175. 7% for Cemtrex, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CETX leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CETX or CODA or LIQT or CLFD or DGII?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CETX or CODA or LIQT or CLFD or DGII more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Digi International Inc. (DGII) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 87x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 5. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) trades at 22. 5x forward P/E versus 72. 1x for Clearfield, Inc. — 49. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CODA: 17. 6% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CETX or CODA or LIQT or CLFD or DGII?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CETX or CODA or LIQT or CLFD or DGII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), +844. 4% 10Y return). Cemtrex, Inc. (CETX) carries a higher beta of 3. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CODA: +844. 4%, CETX: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CETX and CODA and LIQT and CLFD and DGII?
These companies operate in different sectors (CETX (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and LIQT (Industrials) and CLFD (Technology) and DGII (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CETX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; DGII is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.