Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CFBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
CFBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $176M | $2.35B | $203M | $24.47B | $10.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $126M | $867M | $90M | $10.89B | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $17M | $169M | $14M | $382M | $519M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 72.1% | 54.7% | 38.1% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 17.1% | 25.3% | 7.0% | 17.5% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.5x | 10.8x | 11.8x | 7.5x | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $122M | $327M | $52M | $4.01B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $259M | $185M | $119M | $599M | $102M |
CFBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK) | 100 | 258.1 | +158.1% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CFBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CFBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 291.5% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.8x)
NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 3.1% vs CFBK's 2.6%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- +45.6% vs FIS's -35.3%
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.31 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- 20.6% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- Beta 0.28 vs NBTB's 0.89
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs CFBK's 0.8%, ROIC 21.0% vs 5.5% |
CFBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CFBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories
CFBK leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKHY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 121.0x CZWI's $90M. JKHY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $126M | $867M | $90M | $10.9B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $241M | $9M | $3.8B | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $17M | $169M | $14M | $382M | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | $225M | $11M | $2.8B | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.8% | +72.1% | +54.7% | +38.1% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +25.3% | +7.0% | +17.5% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +19.5% | +16.0% | +3.5% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +25.2% | +11.5% | +26.1% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +8.2% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.4% | +39.5% | +63.0% | +92.3% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CFBK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, CFBK trades at a 84% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $176M | $2.4B | $203M | $24.5B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39M | $2.5B | $136M | $27.9B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.17x | 13.53x | 14.44x | 63.00x | 23.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.48x | 10.80x | 11.78x | 7.54x | 21.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.92x | 2.85x | 2.58x | 2.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.81x | 10.35x | 15.28x | 7.66x | 13.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.40x | 2.71x | 2.25x | 2.29x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 1.21x | 1.09x | 1.76x | 5.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.67x | 10.75x | 19.55x | 9.97x | 17.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFBK's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFBK scores 7/9 vs JKHY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +9.5% | +7.8% | +2.7% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +6.0% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +2.4% | +0.6% | +6.6% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$137M | $142M | -$67M | $3.4B | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $259M | $185M | $119M | $599M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $122M | $327M | $52M | $4.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.33x | 1.05x | 0.16x | 4.64x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.3% | +9.3% | +21.5% | -27.3% | -17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.7% | +9.0% | +45.6% | -35.3% | -13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.8% | +54.1% | +160.0% | -6.6% | -1.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.6% | +29.9% | +71.2% | -63.2% | +0.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +291.5% | +102.2% | +157.0% | -13.2% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.9% | +15.5% | +37.5% | -2.2% | -0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.41x | 0.89x | 0.46x | 0.76x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.34 | $46.92 | $22.62 | $82.74 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.10 | $39.20 | $12.83 | $43.30 | $141.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.7% | +96.1% | +93.2% | +57.1% | +75.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.6 | 57.3 | 63.7 | 43.3 | 28.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38K | 236K | 40K | 5.5M | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CFBK as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs CFBK's 1.12%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.00 | $46.00 | — | $67.38 | $203.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 10 | 2 | 37 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +3.2% | +1.8% | +3.5% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.31 | $1.43 | $0.37 | $1.63 | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.4% | +3.1% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CFBK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CFBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CFBK or NBTB or CZWI or FIS or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CFBK or NBTB or CZWI or FIS or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, CF Bankshares Inc.
(CFBK) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, CF Bankshares Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CFBK or NBTB or CZWI or FIS or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CFBK returned +291. 5% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CFBK or NBTB or CZWI or FIS or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 214% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 66% for CF Bankshares Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CFBK or NBTB or CZWI or FIS or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CF Bankshares Inc. grew EPS 30. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CFBK or NBTB or CZWI or FIS or JKHY?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CFBK or NBTB or CZWI or FIS or JKHY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — CFBK or NBTB or CZWI or FIS or JKHY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 1% for CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK).
09Is CFBK or NBTB or CZWI or FIS or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CF Bankshares Inc.
(CFBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), 1. 1% yield, +291. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CFBK: +291. 5%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CFBK and NBTB and CZWI and FIS and JKHY?
These companies operate in different sectors (CFBK (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CFBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.