Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CGON vs IMVT vs RCUS vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
CGON vs IMVT vs RCUS vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $5.74B | $5.83B | $2.62B | $29.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $0.00 | $236M | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-161M | $-464M | $-369M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | -15.0% | — | 90.7% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -47.2% | — | -168.6% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $98K | $99M | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $714M | $222M | $1.98B |
CGON vs IMVT vs RCUS vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CG Oncology, Inc. C… (CGON) | 100 | 182.5 | +82.5% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 78.7 | -21.3% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 171.7 | +71.7% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 84.7 | -15.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CGON vs IMVT vs RCUS vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CGON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 254.7%, EPS growth -47.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 176.6%
- 254.7% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 188.1% 10Y total return vs CGON's 83.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- Beta 1.37, current ratio 11.16x
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +220.2% vs IQV's +20.7%
IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
- 8.3% margin vs CGON's -39.9%
- Beta 1.33 vs RCUS's 1.95
- 4.7% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 254.7% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs CGON's -39.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs RCUS's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +220.2% vs IQV's +20.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1% |
CGON vs IMVT vs RCUS vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CGON vs IMVT vs RCUS vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 2 of 6 categories
CGON leads 1 • IMVT leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CGON's -39.9%. On growth, CGON holds the edge at +4.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $0 | $236M | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$189M | -$487M | -$391M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$161M | -$464M | -$369M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$132M | -$423M | -$489M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -15.0% | — | +90.7% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -47.2% | — | -168.6% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.9% | — | -156.4% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.8% | — | -2.1% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | — | -39.3% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | +19.7% | +10.5% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CGON and RCUS and IQV each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.7B | $5.8B | $2.6B | $29.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $5.1B | $2.5B | $44.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -32.70x | -10.50x | -7.90x | 22.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 13.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 12.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1421.40x | — | 10.60x | 1.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.99x | 6.14x | 4.43x | 4.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 14.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IQV scores 4/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.9% | -47.1% | -69.0% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.8% | -44.1% | -35.3% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -23.8% | — | -64.1% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.5% | -66.1% | -42.1% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.00x | 0.16x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | -$714M | -$123M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $714M | $222M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $98,000 | $99M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -13.38x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CGON leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CGON five years ago would be worth $18,297 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,632 for IQV. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +220.2% total return vs IQV's +20.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CGON at 22.3% vs IQV's -2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +62.7% | +10.7% | +11.6% | -21.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +213.4% | +107.2% | +220.2% | +20.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.0% | +48.4% | +31.0% | -7.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.0% | +73.9% | -13.7% | -23.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.0% | +188.1% | +52.9% | +167.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.3% | +14.1% | +9.4% | -2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMVT and IQV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IQV is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs IQV's 71.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.37x | 1.95x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $73.57 | $30.09 | $28.72 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.00 | $13.36 | $7.06 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +95.3% | +90.5% | +71.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 55.7 | 60.9 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.4M | 1.2M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CGON as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.7% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs 15.4% for RCUS (target: $30).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $79.86 | $45.50 | $30.00 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 23 | 18 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.2% |
IQV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CGON leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CGON vs IMVT vs RCUS vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CGON or IMVT or RCUS or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CG Oncology, Inc.
Common stock (CGON) is the stronger pick with 254. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 5x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CG Oncology, Inc. Common stock (CGON) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CGON or IMVT or RCUS or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, CG Oncology, Inc.
Common stock (CGON) delivered a total return of +83. 0%, compared to -23. 7% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +188. 1% versus RCUS's +52. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CGON or IMVT or RCUS or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 33β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 47% more volatile than IQV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CGON or IMVT or RCUS or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CG Oncology, Inc.
Common stock (CGON) is pulling ahead at 254. 7% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IQVIA Holdings Inc. grew EPS 4. 7% year-over-year, compared to -47. 5% for CG Oncology, Inc. Common stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, CGON leads at 176. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CGON or IMVT or RCUS or IQV?
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -39. 9% for CG Oncology, Inc. Common stock — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQV leads at 14. 0% versus -47. 2% for CGON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CGON or IMVT or RCUS or IQV more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMVT: 58.
7% to $45. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — CGON or IMVT or RCUS or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CGON or IMVT or RCUS or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+167. 5% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IQV: +167. 5%, RCUS: +52. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CGON and IMVT and RCUS and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CGON is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.