Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CHD vs RCUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
CHD vs RCUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $22.15B | $2.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.21B | $236M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $733M | $-369M |
| Gross Margin | 45.1% | 90.7% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | -168.6% |
| Forward P/E | 24.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $2.21B | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $409M | $222M |
CHD vs RCUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Church & Dwight Co.… (CHD) | 100 | 124.6 | +24.6% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 83.1 | -16.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHD vs RCUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 1.6%, EPS growth 27.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.9%
- 117.3% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 53.3%
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +191.5% vs CHD's +2.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.6% revenue growth vs RCUS's -4.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs RCUS's -156.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs RCUS's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; 23-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +191.5% vs CHD's +2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.2% ROA vs RCUS's -35.3%, ROIC 13.9% vs -64.1% |
CHD vs RCUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CHD vs RCUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHD is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.2B annually — 26.3x RCUS's $236M. CHD is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCUS's -156.4%. On growth, CHD holds the edge at +0.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.2B | $236M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | -$391M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $733M | -$369M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | -$489M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.1% | +90.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | -168.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -156.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.1% | -39.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +10.5% |
Valuation Metrics
RCUS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.2B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.0B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.97x | -7.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.91x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.08x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.57x | 10.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.71x | 4.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.27x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHD delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. RCUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHD's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHD scores 7/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.4% | -69.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.2% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.9% | -64.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.4% | -42.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | -$123M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $409M | $222M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $99M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.59x | -13.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CHD and RCUS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHD five years ago would be worth $11,219 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,423 for RCUS. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +191.5% total return vs CHD's +2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCUS at 10.0% vs CHD's -0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.5% | +11.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.1% | +191.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.6% | +33.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | -15.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.3% | +53.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.2% | +10.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHD and RCUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHD is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.14x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $106.04 | $28.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $81.33 | $7.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.2% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CHD as "Buy" and RCUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.1% upside for RCUS (target: $30) vs 6.5% for CHD (target: $100). CHD is the only dividend payer here at 1.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $99.60 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 23 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | 0.0% |
CHD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RCUS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CHD vs RCUS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHD or RCUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the stronger pick with 1. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) offers the better valuation at 31. 0x trailing P/E (24. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CHD or RCUS?
Over the past 5 years, Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) delivered a total return of +12. 2%, compared to -15. 8% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHD returned +117. 3% versus RCUS's +53. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CHD or RCUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 1304% more volatile than CHD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 55% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CHD or RCUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is pulling ahead at 1. 6% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CHD or RCUS?
Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 9% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHD leads at 17. 4% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CHD or RCUS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RCUS: 15.
1% to $30. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CHD or RCUS?
In this comparison, CHD (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. RCUS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CHD or RCUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 1. 3% yield, +117. 3% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHD: +117. 3%, RCUS: +53. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CHD and RCUS?
These companies operate in different sectors (CHD (Consumer Defensive) and RCUS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
CHD pays a dividend while RCUS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.