Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CHD vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
CHD vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $22.15B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.21B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $733M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 45.1% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 25.3x | 44.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.21B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $409M | $10.73B |
CHD vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Church & Dwight Co.… (CHD) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.6 | +214.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHD vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 55.1%, current ratio 1.07x
- Beta 0.14, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.07x
- Lower P/E (25.3x vs 44.9x)
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs CHD's 117.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs CHD's 1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.3x vs 44.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs WMT's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs CHD's 0.14 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs CHD's +2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.2% ROA vs WMT's 7.9%, ROIC 13.9% vs 14.7% |
CHD vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CHD vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 113.3x CHD's $6.2B. CHD is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WMT's 3.3%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.2B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $733M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.1% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.1% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CHD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.0x trailing earnings, CHD trades at a 35% valuation discount to WMT's 47.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHD's 18.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 25.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.2B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.0B | $1.10T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.97x | 47.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.30x | 44.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.08x | 24.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.57x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.71x | 10.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.27x | 25.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $17 for CHD. CHD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHD scores 7/9 vs WMT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.4% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.2% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.9% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.4% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $409M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.59x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,774 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,219 for CHD. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.6% total return vs CHD's +2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 38.1% vs CHD's -0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.5% | +16.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.1% | +32.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.6% | +163.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | +187.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.3% | +517.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.2% | +38.1% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHD's 0.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs CHD's 88.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.14x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $106.04 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $81.33 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.2% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 17.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CHD and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CHD as "Buy" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for CHD (target: $100) vs 4.8% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, CHD offers the higher dividend yield at 1.26% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $99.60 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 23 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +0.8% |
CHD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
CHD vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHD or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 6% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD). Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) offers the better valuation at 31. 0x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHD or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the cheapest at 31. 0x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 9x. On forward P/E, Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHD or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +187. 7%, compared to +12. 2% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +517. 6% versus CHD's +116. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHD or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. 's 0. 14β — meaning CHD is approximately 19% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHD or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 1. 6% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHD or WMT?
Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 9% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHD leads at 17. 4% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHD leads at 44. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHD or WMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) trades at 25. 3x forward P/E versus 44. 9x for Walmart Inc. — 19. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHD: 6. 5% to $99. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHD or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is CHD or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +517. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +517. 6%, CHD: +116. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHD and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.