Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CHMG vs AROW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CHMG vs AROW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $331M | $612M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $243M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $44M |
| Gross Margin | 64.2% | 65.3% |
| Operating Margin | 14.2% | 22.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $29M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $29M |
CHMG vs AROW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 272.1 | +172.1% |
| Arrow Financial Cor… (AROW) | 100 | 142.6 | +42.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHMG vs AROW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHMG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 198.0% 10Y total return vs AROW's 110.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 0.73, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.13x
AROW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 49.7%
- 8.7% NII/revenue growth vs CHMG's -6.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.7% NII/revenue growth vs CHMG's -6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 10.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs AROW's 0.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs CHMG's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.5% vs AROW's +49.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5% |
CHMG vs AROW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CHMG vs AROW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AROW leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AROW is the larger business by revenue, generating $243M annually — 1.7x CHMG's $140M. AROW is the more profitable business, keeping 18.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHMG's 10.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $243M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $60M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $47M | $36M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.2% | +65.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | +22.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +18.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +14.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.8% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CHMG and AROW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, AROW trades at a 36% valuation discount to CHMG's 22.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AROW's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHMG's 15.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $331M | $612M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $314M | $612M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.01x | 13.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.64x | 10.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.73x | 11.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.37x | 2.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 163.62x | 16.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AROW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AROW delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for CHMG. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AROW's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AROW scores 7/9 vs CHMG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$18M | $62,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $29M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 0.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHMG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHMG five years ago would be worth $17,043 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,317 for AROW. Over the past 12 months, CHMG leads with a +54.5% total return vs AROW's +49.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHMG at 27.7% vs AROW's 27.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.0% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.5% | +49.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +108.2% | +107.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.4% | +23.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.0% | +110.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.7% | +27.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHMG and AROW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHMG is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AROW's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.83 | $38.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.20 | $24.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.4 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 91K |
Analyst Outlook
AROW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CHMG as "Hold" and AROW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -19.1% upside for AROW (target: $30) vs -27.4% for CHMG (target: $50). For income investors, AROW offers the higher dividend yield at 3.09% vs CHMG's 1.91%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.31 | $1.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% |
AROW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CHMG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CHMG vs AROW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHMG or AROW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) is the stronger pick with 8.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHMG or AROW?
On trailing P/E, Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) is the cheapest at 14.
0x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, Chemung Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHMG or AROW?
Over the past 5 years, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) delivered a total return of +70.
4%, compared to +23. 2% for Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHMG returned +198. 0% versus AROW's +110. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHMG or AROW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
73β versus Arrow Financial Corporation's 0. 77β — meaning AROW is approximately 5% more volatile than CHMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 7% for Arrow Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHMG or AROW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) is pulling ahead at 8.
7% versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrow Financial Corporation grew EPS 49. 7% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHMG or AROW?
Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
1% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AROW leads at 22. 8% versus 14. 2% for CHMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AROW leads at 65. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHMG or AROW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) trades at 9.
6x forward P/E versus 10. 2x for Arrow Financial Corporation — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AROW: -19. 1% to $30. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHMG or AROW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 1. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG).
09Is CHMG or AROW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
73), 1. 9% yield, +198. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHMG: +198. 0%, AROW: +110. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHMG and AROW?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AROW is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.