Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CHMG vs AROW

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CHMG
Chemung Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$331M
5Y Perf.+172.1%
AROW
Arrow Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$612M
5Y Perf.+42.6%

CHMG vs AROW — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CHMG logoCHMG
AROW logoAROW
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$331M$612M
Revenue (TTM)$140M$243M
Net Income (TTM)$15M$44M
Gross Margin64.2%65.3%
Operating Margin14.2%22.8%
Forward P/E9.6x10.2x
Total Debt$5M$29M
Cash & Equiv.$23M$29M

CHMG vs AROWLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CHMG
AROW
StockMay 20May 26Return
Chemung Financial C… (CHMG)100272.1+172.1%
Arrow Financial Cor… (AROW)100142.6+42.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CHMG vs AROW

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AROW leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Chemung Financial Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CHMG
Chemung Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

CHMG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 198.0% 10Y total return vs AROW's 110.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 0.13x
  • Beta 0.73, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.13x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
AROW
Arrow Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

AROW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 3.1%
  • Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 49.7%
  • 8.7% NII/revenue growth vs CHMG's -6.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAROW logoAROW8.7% NII/revenue growth vs CHMG's -6.5%
ValueCHMG logoCHMGLower P/E (9.6x vs 10.2x)
Quality / MarginsAROW logoAROWEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyCHMG logoCHMGBeta 0.73 vs AROW's 0.77, lower leverage
DividendsAROW logoAROW3.1% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs CHMG's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)CHMG logoCHMG+54.5% vs AROW's +49.8%
Efficiency (ROA)AROW logoAROWEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5%

CHMG vs AROW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CHMGChemung Financial Corporation
FY 2025
W M G Fee Income
47.4%$12M
Interchange Revenue
17.1%$4M
Product and Service, Other
11.7%$3M
Overdraft Fees
11.4%$3M
Service Charge on Deposits, Other
6.2%$2M
Investment Brokerage
4.7%$1M
Sale of Loans
1.0%$261,000
Other (1)
0.6%$149,000
AROWArrow Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
51.9%$11M
Fiduciary and Trust
48.1%$10M

CHMG vs AROW — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAROWLAGGINGCHMG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AROW leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

AROW is the larger business by revenue, generating $243M annually — 1.7x CHMG's $140M. AROW is the more profitable business, keeping 18.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHMG's 10.8%.

MetricCHMG logoCHMGChemung Financial…AROW logoAROWArrow Financial C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$140M$243M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$22M$60M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$15M$44M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$47M$36M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+64.2%+65.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.2%+22.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.8%+18.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.4%+14.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+29.8%+2.1%
AROW leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CHMG and AROW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.0x trailing earnings, AROW trades at a 36% valuation discount to CHMG's 22.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AROW's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHMG's 15.7x.

MetricCHMG logoCHMGChemung Financial…AROW logoAROWArrow Financial C…
Market CapShares × price$331M$612M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$314M$612M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS22.01x13.99x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.64x10.16x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.30x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.73x11.05x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.37x2.52x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.30x1.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF163.62x16.91x
Evenly matched — CHMG and AROW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AROW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AROW delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for CHMG. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AROW's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AROW scores 7/9 vs CHMG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCHMG logoCHMGChemung Financial…AROW logoAROWArrow Financial C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.3%+10.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+1.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.0%+9.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.6%+2.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.07x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$18M$62,000
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$23M$29M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$29M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.44x0.72x
AROW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CHMG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CHMG five years ago would be worth $17,043 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,317 for AROW. Over the past 12 months, CHMG leads with a +54.5% total return vs AROW's +49.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHMG at 27.7% vs AROW's 27.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCHMG logoCHMGChemung Financial…AROW logoAROWArrow Financial C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+27.0%+19.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+54.5%+49.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+108.2%+107.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+70.4%+23.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+198.0%+110.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+27.7%+27.5%
CHMG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CHMG and AROW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CHMG is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AROW's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricCHMG logoCHMGChemung Financial…AROW logoAROWArrow Financial C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.73x0.77x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$70.83$38.09
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$43.20$24.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.3%+97.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.458.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10K91K
Evenly matched — CHMG and AROW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

AROW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates CHMG as "Hold" and AROW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -19.1% upside for AROW (target: $30) vs -27.4% for CHMG (target: $50). For income investors, AROW offers the higher dividend yield at 3.09% vs CHMG's 1.91%.

MetricCHMG logoCHMGChemung Financial…AROW logoAROWArrow Financial C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$50.00$30.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts71
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%+3.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises021
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.31$1.14
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.7%
AROW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AROW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CHMG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallArrow Financial Corporation (AROW)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CHMG vs AROW: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CHMG or AROW a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) is the stronger pick with 8.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CHMG or AROW?

On trailing P/E, Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) is the cheapest at 14.

0x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, Chemung Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CHMG or AROW?

Over the past 5 years, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) delivered a total return of +70.

4%, compared to +23. 2% for Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHMG returned +198. 0% versus AROW's +110. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CHMG or AROW?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

73β versus Arrow Financial Corporation's 0. 77β — meaning AROW is approximately 5% more volatile than CHMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 7% for Arrow Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CHMG or AROW?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) is pulling ahead at 8.

7% versus -6. 5% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrow Financial Corporation grew EPS 49. 7% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CHMG or AROW?

Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

1% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AROW leads at 22. 8% versus 14. 2% for CHMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AROW leads at 65. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CHMG or AROW more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) trades at 9.

6x forward P/E versus 10. 2x for Arrow Financial Corporation — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AROW: -19. 1% to $30. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CHMG or AROW?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Arrow Financial Corporation (AROW) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 1. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG).

09

Is CHMG or AROW better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

73), 1. 9% yield, +198. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHMG: +198. 0%, AROW: +110. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CHMG and AROW?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AROW is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CHMG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AROW

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CHMG and AROW on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CHMG: -6.5% · AROW: 8.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(CHMG: 10.8% · AROW: 18.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CHMG: 22.0x · AROW: 14.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.