Waste Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Capital Markets
Chemicals - Specialty
Financial - Capital Markets
CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Capital Markets | Chemicals - Specialty | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $42M | $3M | $589M | $4M | $4.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $346M | $164M | $14M | $907M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-24M | $137M | $-27M | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | — | 3.7% | 61.9% | -82.1% | -47.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.5% | 16.8% | -116.6% | -90.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 9.2x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 | $14M | $9M | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $237M | $95M | $10M | $547M |
CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| China Natural Resou… (CHNR) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
| SOS Limited (SOS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 191.6 | +91.6% |
| Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 1814.3 | +1714.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHNR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- -2.3% vs SOS's -75.4%
SOS is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.01, current ratio 9.97x
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0%
- Better valuation composite
GURE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.52
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 0.98x
- Beta 0.52 vs BTBT's 3.37
MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -51.6% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -60.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs GURE's -195.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.3% vs SOS's -75.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs MARA's -17.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -9.0% |
CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
SOS leads 1 • MARA leads 1 • GURE leads 1 • CHNR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA and CHNR operate at a comparable scale, with $907M and $0 in trailing revenue. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GURE's -195.8%. On growth, GURE holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $346M | $164M | $14M | $907M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$15M | $166M | $1M | $627M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$24M | $137M | -$27M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$141.0B | -$448M | -$498,990 | -$312M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +3.7% | +61.9% | -82.1% | -47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -9.5% | +16.8% | -116.6% | -90.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -7.0% | +17.3% | -195.8% | -144.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -407.3% | -65.3% | -3.6% | -34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +48.1% | — | +2.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.3% | +33.3% | +2.8% | +98.1% | -4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SOS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42M | $3M | $589M | $4M | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | -$234M | $508M | $3M | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -88.68x | -0.25x | 9.15x | -0.07x | -3.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.49x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.01x | 3.60x | 0.51x | 5.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.21x | 0.01x | 0.56x | 0.03x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs GURE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.7% | -5.6% | +21.4% | -19.2% | -30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | -4.9% | +19.0% | -16.6% | -17.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.0% | -9.5% | +6.5% | -11.2% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | -5.0% | +8.5% | -11.6% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.03x | 0.06x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$237M | -$81M | -$1M | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $237M | $95M | $10M | $547M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 | $14M | $9M | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -263.29x | — | — | -268.95x | 4.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MARA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MARA five years ago would be worth $4,054 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for SOS. Over the past 12 months, CHNR leads with a -2.3% total return vs SOS's -75.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MARA at 10.8% vs SOS's -74.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.2% | -26.0% | -10.3% | -5.7% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.3% | -75.4% | -9.0% | -40.8% | -4.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.7% | -98.3% | -19.7% | -87.6% | +36.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | -100.0% | -84.6% | -94.6% | -59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -100.0% | -60.4% | -95.0% | -51.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.2% | -74.5% | -7.1% | -50.2% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GURE and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GURE is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs SOS's 11.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 2.01x | 3.37x | 0.52x | 3.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.20 | $9.62 | $4.55 | $11.83 | $23.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.16 | $0.90 | $1.25 | $2.04 | $6.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.4% | +11.5% | +40.2% | +30.5% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 46.7 | 69.1 | 41.0 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 893K | 117K | 18.5M | 60K | 47.6M |
Analyst Outlook
GURE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $5.00 | — | $16.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 2 | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.01 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SOS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARA: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA?
Over the past 5 years, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) delivered a total return of -59. 5%, compared to -100. 0% for SOS Limited (SOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MARA returned -51. 6% versus SOS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulf Resources, Inc.
(GURE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 549% more volatile than GURE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -82. 3% for SOS Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOS leads at -7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -769. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -277. 8% for GURE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CHNR, SOS, GURE, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gulf Resources, Inc.
(GURE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52)). SOS Limited (SOS) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GURE: -95. 0%, SOS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CHNR and SOS and BTBT and GURE and MARA?
These companies operate in different sectors (CHNR (Industrials) and SOS (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services) and GURE (Basic Materials) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CHNR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; GURE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.