Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$42M
5Y Perf.-86.7%
SOS
SOS Limited

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • CN
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-99.9%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.+91.6%
GURE
Gulf Resources, Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$4M
5Y Perf.-91.6%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.+1714.3%

CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CHNR logoCHNR
SOS logoSOS
BTBT logoBTBT
GURE logoGURE
MARA logoMARA
IndustryWaste ManagementSoftware - InfrastructureFinancial - Capital MarketsChemicals - SpecialtyFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$42M$3M$589M$4M$4.83B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$346M$164M$14M$907M
Net Income (TTM)$-14M$-24M$137M$-27M$-1.31B
Gross Margin3.7%61.9%-82.1%-47.7%
Operating Margin-9.5%16.8%-116.6%-90.6%
Forward P/E9.2x
Total Debt$0.00$0.00$14M$9M$3.65B
Cash & Equiv.$3M$237M$95M$10M$547M

CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CHNR
SOS
BTBT
GURE
MARA
StockMay 20May 26Return
China Natural Resou… (CHNR)10013.3-86.7%
SOS Limited (SOS)1000.1-99.9%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)100191.6+91.6%
Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE)1008.4-91.6%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)1001814.3+1714.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. China Natural Resources, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. GURE also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

CHNR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • -2.3% vs SOS's -75.4%
Best for: momentum
SOS
SOS Limited
The Defensive Pick

SOS is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 2.01, current ratio 9.97x
Best for: defensive
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
GURE
Gulf Resources, Inc.
The Income Pick

GURE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.52
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 0.98x
  • Beta 0.52 vs BTBT's 3.37
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • -51.6% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -60.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0%
ValueBTBT logoBTBTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs GURE's -195.8%
Stability / SafetyGURE logoGUREBeta 0.52 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CHNR logoCHNR-2.3% vs SOS's -75.4%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs MARA's -17.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -9.0%

CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CHNRChina Natural Resources, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SOSSOS Limited
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$1M
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
GUREGulf Resources, Inc.
FY 2023
Natural Gas
100.0%$150,861
Corporate
0.0%$0
Crude Salt
0.0%$0
Chemical Products
0.0%$0
Segment Total
0.0%$0
Bromine
0.0%$0
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M

CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBTBTLAGGINGCHNR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MARA and CHNR operate at a comparable scale, with $907M and $0 in trailing revenue. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GURE's -195.8%. On growth, GURE holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCHNR logoCHNRChina Natural Res…SOS logoSOSSOS LimitedBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.GURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$346M$164M$14M$907M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$12M-$15M$166M$1M$627M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$14M-$24M$137M-$27M-$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6M-$141.0B-$448M-$498,990-$312M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+3.7%+61.9%-82.1%-47.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.5%+16.8%-116.6%-90.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.0%+17.3%-195.8%-144.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-407.3%-65.3%-3.6%-34.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+48.1%+2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+91.3%+33.3%+2.8%+98.1%-4.8%
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SOS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricCHNR logoCHNRChina Natural Res…SOS logoSOSSOS LimitedBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.GURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Market CapShares × price$42M$3M$589M$4M$4.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$41M-$234M$508M$3M$7.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-88.68x-0.25x9.15x-0.07x-3.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.01x3.60x0.51x5.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.21x0.01x0.56x0.03x1.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
SOS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs GURE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCHNR logoCHNRChina Natural Res…SOS logoSOSSOS LimitedBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.GURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-15.7%-5.6%+21.4%-19.2%-30.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.3%-4.9%+19.0%-16.6%-17.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.0%-9.5%+6.5%-11.2%-9.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.0%-5.0%+8.5%-11.6%-12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–923623
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.06x1.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M-$237M-$81M-$1M$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$237M$95M$10M$547M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$0$14M$9M$3.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-263.29x-268.95x4.73x
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MARA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MARA five years ago would be worth $4,054 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for SOS. Over the past 12 months, CHNR leads with a -2.3% total return vs SOS's -75.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MARA at 10.8% vs SOS's -74.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCHNR logoCHNRChina Natural Res…SOS logoSOSSOS LimitedBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.GURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+22.2%-26.0%-10.3%-5.7%+28.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-2.3%-75.4%-9.0%-40.8%-4.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.7%-98.3%-19.7%-87.6%+36.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.8%-100.0%-84.6%-94.6%-59.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.5%-100.0%-60.4%-95.0%-51.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-41.2%-74.5%-7.1%-50.2%+10.8%
MARA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GURE and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GURE is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs SOS's 11.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCHNR logoCHNRChina Natural Res…SOS logoSOSSOS LimitedBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.GURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.12x2.01x3.37x0.52x3.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.20$9.62$4.55$11.83$23.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.16$0.90$1.25$2.04$6.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+52.4%+11.5%+40.2%+30.5%+54.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.246.769.141.069.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded893K117K18.5M60K47.6M
Evenly matched — GURE and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GURE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCHNR logoCHNRChina Natural Res…SOS logoSOSSOS LimitedBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.GURE logoGUREGulf Resources, I…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00$16.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts219
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises002
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.0%
GURE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SOS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallBit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CHNR vs SOS vs BTBT vs GURE vs MARA: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA?

Over the past 5 years, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) delivered a total return of -59. 5%, compared to -100. 0% for SOS Limited (SOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MARA returned -51. 6% versus SOS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulf Resources, Inc.

(GURE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 549% more volatile than GURE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -82. 3% for SOS Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOS leads at -7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -769. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -277. 8% for GURE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. CHNR, SOS, GURE, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is CHNR or SOS or BTBT or GURE or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Gulf Resources, Inc.

(GURE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52)). SOS Limited (SOS) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GURE: -95. 0%, SOS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between CHNR and SOS and BTBT and GURE and MARA?

These companies operate in different sectors (CHNR (Industrials) and SOS (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services) and GURE (Basic Materials) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CHNR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; GURE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CHNR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SOS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GURE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 125%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.