Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CHPT vs TSLA vs BLNK vs EVGO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$134M
5Y Perf.-99.1%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.55T
5Y Perf.+117.7%
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$91M
5Y Perf.-96.9%
EVGO
EVgo, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$596M
5Y Perf.-80.9%

CHPT vs TSLA vs BLNK vs EVGO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CHPT logoCHPT
TSLA logoTSLA
BLNK logoBLNK
EVGO logoEVGO
IndustrySpecialty RetailAuto - ManufacturersEngineering & ConstructionSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$134M$1.55T$91M$596M
Revenue (TTM)$411M$97.88B$106M$418M
Net Income (TTM)$-220M$3.88B$-126M$-47M
Gross Margin30.5%19.1%26.0%20.2%
Operating Margin-51.1%5.0%-119.5%-26.3%
Forward P/E213.0x
Total Debt$272M$8.38B$11M$107M
Cash & Equiv.$142M$16.51B$42M$151M

CHPT vs TSLA vs BLNK vs EVGOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CHPT
TSLA
BLNK
EVGO
StockNov 20May 26Return
ChargePoint Holding… (CHPT)1000.9-99.1%
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)100217.7+117.7%
Blink Charging Co. (BLNK)1003.1-96.9%
EVgo, Inc. (EVGO)10019.1-80.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CHPT vs TSLA vs BLNK vs EVGO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TSLA leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. EVgo, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

CHPT plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

TSLA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 28.6% 10Y total return vs EVGO's -80.6%
  • 4.0% margin vs BLNK's -118.7%
  • +49.1% vs CHPT's -48.3%
  • 2.9% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 4.5% vs -109.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
The Secondary Option

BLNK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
EVGO
EVgo, Inc.
The Income Pick

EVGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • beta 2.04
  • Rev growth 49.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 91.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.04, Low D/E 27.7%, current ratio 2.19x
  • Beta 2.04, current ratio 2.19x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthEVGO logoEVGO49.6% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
Quality / MarginsTSLA logoTSLA4.0% margin vs BLNK's -118.7%
Stability / SafetyEVGO logoEVGOBeta 2.04 vs BLNK's 2.96
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TSLA logoTSLA+49.1% vs CHPT's -48.3%
Efficiency (ROA)TSLA logoTSLA2.9% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 4.5% vs -109.7%

CHPT vs TSLA vs BLNK vs EVGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CHPTChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
56.3%$235M
License and Service
34.6%$144M
Product and Service, Other
9.1%$38M
TSLATesla, Inc.
FY 2025
Automotive
73.3%$69.5B
Energy Generation And Storage Segment
13.5%$12.8B
Services And Other
13.2%$12.5B
BLNKBlink Charging Co.
FY 2024
Product
57.7%$82M
Service
15.1%$21M
Host Provider Fees
9.1%$13M
Network
6.2%$9M
Warranty
4.5%$6M
Depreciation and Amortization
4.4%$6M
Warranty And Repairs And Maintenance
1.8%$3M
Other (1)
1.1%$2M
EVGOEVgo, Inc.
FY 2025
Charging Revenue Retail
50.0%$134M
Ancillary Revenue.
18.4%$49M
Charging Revenue Commercial
13.0%$35M
Charging Revenue OEM
9.8%$26M
Network Revenue OEM
5.0%$13M
Regulatory Credit Sales
3.8%$10M

CHPT vs TSLA vs BLNK vs EVGO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTSLALAGGINGBLNK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TSLA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

TSLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.9B annually — 920.3x BLNK's $106M. TSLA is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLNK's -118.7%. On growth, EVGO holds the edge at +45.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…TSLA logoTSLATesla, Inc.BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.EVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$411M$97.9B$106M$418M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$180M$9.5B-$115M-$39M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$220M$3.9B-$126M-$47M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$67M$7.0B-$47M-$165M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.5%+19.1%+26.0%+20.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-51.1%+5.0%-119.5%-26.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-53.5%+4.0%-118.7%-11.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-16.3%+7.2%-44.5%-39.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.3%+15.8%+11.7%+45.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+28.8%+11.9%+99.9%-66.7%
TSLA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

EVGO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricCHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…TSLA logoTSLATesla, Inc.BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.EVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$134M$1.55T$91M$596M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$263M$1.54T$60M$552M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.65x381.31x-0.40x-6.13x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.212.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate9.84x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple146.35x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.32x16.30x0.73x1.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.77x17.53x0.67x0.66x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF248.44x
EVGO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TSLA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

TSLA delivers a 4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CHPT. BLNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHPT's 12.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSLA scores 6/9 vs BLNK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…TSLA logoTSLATesla, Inc.BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.EVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.5%+4.8%-131.9%-12.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-25.8%+2.9%-66.7%-5.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-83.8%+4.5%-109.7%-21.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-41.6%+4.4%-77.3%-14.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95636
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage12.75x0.10x0.09x0.28x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$130M-$8.1B-$31M-$44M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$142M$16.5B$42M$151M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$272M$8.4B$11M$107M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-8.58x17.04x-9064.60x-11.79x
TSLA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TSLA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TSLA five years ago would be worth $18,375 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $136 for CHPT. Over the past 12 months, TSLA leads with a +49.1% total return vs CHPT's -48.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSLA at 33.8% vs CHPT's -67.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…TSLA logoTSLATesla, Inc.BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.EVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-12.5%-6.0%+7.2%-38.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-48.3%+49.1%+4.8%-48.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.6%+139.7%-88.9%-70.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%+83.7%-97.6%-83.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.8%+2856.3%-97.5%-80.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-67.6%+33.8%-51.9%-33.4%
TSLA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TSLA and EVGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

EVGO is the less volatile stock with a 2.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSLA currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs BLNK's 29.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…TSLA logoTSLATesla, Inc.BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.EVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.61x2.06x2.96x2.04x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.78$498.83$2.65$5.18
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.45$271.00$0.45$1.64
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+34.6%+82.6%+29.9%+36.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.059.366.440.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded474K61.6M2.1M4.4M
Evenly matched — TSLA and EVGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CHPT as "Hold", TSLA as "Hold", EVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 176.3% upside for EVGO (target: $5) vs 9.4% for TSLA (target: $450).

MetricCHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…TSLA logoTSLATesla, Inc.BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.EVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.50$450.45$5.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts218116
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

TSLA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EVGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallTesla, Inc. (TSLA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CHPT vs TSLA vs BLNK vs EVGO: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CHPT or TSLA or BLNK or EVGO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, EVgo, Inc.

(EVGO) is the stronger pick with 49. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) offers the better valuation at 381. 3x trailing P/E (213. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — CHPT or TSLA or BLNK or EVGO?

Over the past 5 years, Tesla, Inc.

(TSLA) delivered a total return of +83. 7%, compared to -98. 6% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLA returned +28. 6% versus BLNK's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — CHPT or TSLA or BLNK or EVGO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EVgo, Inc.

(EVGO) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 04β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 2. 96β — meaning BLNK is approximately 45% more volatile than EVGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 13% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — CHPT or TSLA or BLNK or EVGO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVgo, Inc.

(EVGO) is pulling ahead at 49. 6% versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blink Charging Co. grew EPS 38. 9% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Tesla, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVGO leads at 91. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — CHPT or TSLA or BLNK or EVGO?

Tesla, Inc.

(TSLA) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 0% net margin versus -159. 2% for Blink Charging Co. — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSLA leads at 4. 6% versus -160. 6% for BLNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLNK leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is CHPT or TSLA or BLNK or EVGO more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVGO: 176.

3% to $5. 25.

07

Which pays a better dividend — CHPT or TSLA or BLNK or EVGO?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is CHPT or TSLA or BLNK or EVGO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Tesla, Inc.

(TSLA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TSLA: +28. 6%, BLNK: -97. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between CHPT and TSLA and BLNK and EVGO?

These companies operate in different sectors (CHPT (Consumer Cyclical) and TSLA (Consumer Cyclical) and BLNK (Industrials) and EVGO (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TSLA is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVGO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CHPT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TSLA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLNK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EVGO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 22%
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CHPT and TSLA and BLNK and EVGO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CHPT: 7.3% · TSLA: 15.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.