CHR
Cheer Holding, Inc.
Advertising Agencies
Market Cap$364K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CHR vs FEDU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FEDU
Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
Education & Training Services
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-56.1%
CHR vs FEDU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CHR | FEDU |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $364K | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $311M | $251M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $59M | $801K |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | 18.4% | -6.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $98M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $242M | $211M |
CHR vs FEDU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CHR
FEDU
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheer Holding, Inc. (CHR) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Four Seasons Educat… (FEDU) | 100 | 43.9 | -56.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHR vs FEDU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FEDU leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Cheer Holding, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CHR
Cheer Holding, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
CHR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, Low D/E 2.6%, current ratio 11.53x
- Lower P/E (0.1x vs 18.8x)
- 19.0% margin vs FEDU's 0.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
FEDU
Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
The Income Pick
FEDU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 100.1%, EPS growth -81.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.1%
- -88.5% 10Y total return vs CHR's -100.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FEDU | 100.1% revenue growth vs CHR's 1.1% |
| Value | CHR | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 18.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | CHR | 19.0% margin vs FEDU's 0.3% |
| Stability / Safety | FEDU | Beta 0.29 vs CHR's 0.62 |
| Dividends | FEDU | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FEDU | +38.0% vs CHR's -99.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CHR | 20.8% ROA vs FEDU's 0.1%, ROIC 15.4% vs -3.0% |
CHR vs FEDU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
CHR vs FEDU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCHRLAGGINGFEDU
FEDUFour Seasons Educatio…
2leads
CHRCheer Holding, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FEDUMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CHR5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CHR3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CHR7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FEDU6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FEDU2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHR and FEDU operate at a comparable scale, with $311M and $251M in trailing revenue. CHR is the more profitable business, keeping 19.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FEDU's 0.3%. On growth, FEDU holds the edge at +83.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CHRCheer Holding, In… | FEDUFour Seasons Educ… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $311M | $251M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $59M | $801,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $66M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +18.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | -6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | -14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +83.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | -12.3% |
CHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CHR leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.1x trailing earnings, CHR trades at a 100% valuation discount to FEDU's 18.8x P/E.
| Metric | CHRCheer Holding, In… | FEDUFour Seasons Educ… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $364,130 | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$232M | -$14M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.08x | 18.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -6.98x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.02x | — |
CHR leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHR leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHR delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $0 for FEDU. CHR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FEDU's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FEDU scores 5/9 vs CHR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CHRCheer Holding, In… | FEDUFour Seasons Educ… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.3% | +0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.8% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.4% | -3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$233M | -$112M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $242M | $211M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $98M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 942.39x | — |
CHR leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FEDU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FEDU five years ago would be worth $5,921 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for CHR. Over the past 12 months, FEDU leads with a +38.0% total return vs CHR's -99.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FEDU at 9.3% vs CHR's -87.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CHRCheer Holding, In… | FEDUFour Seasons Educ… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -57.8% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.2% | +38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +30.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -40.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -88.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -87.8% | +9.3% |
FEDU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FEDU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FEDU is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHR's 0.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FEDU currently trades 60.6% from its 52-week high vs CHR's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CHRCheer Holding, In… | FEDUFour Seasons Educ… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $313.50 | $17.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.25 | $6.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.6% | +60.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.8 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 1K |
FEDU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
FEDU is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CHRCheer Holding, In… | FEDUFour Seasons Educ… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $164.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CHR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FEDU leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallCheer Holding, Inc. (CHR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CHR vs FEDU: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHR or FEDU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the stronger pick with 100. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Cheer Holding, Inc. (CHR). Cheer Holding, Inc. (CHR) offers the better valuation at 0. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. (FEDU) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHR or FEDU?
On trailing P/E, Cheer Holding, Inc.
(CHR) is the cheapest at 0. 1x versus Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. at 18. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHR or FEDU?
Over the past 5 years, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) delivered a total return of -40. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Cheer Holding, Inc. (CHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FEDU returned -88. 5% versus CHR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHR or FEDU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Cheer Holding, Inc. 's 0. 62β — meaning CHR is approximately 116% more volatile than FEDU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cheer Holding, Inc. (CHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 19% for Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHR or FEDU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is pulling ahead at 100. 1% versus 1. 1% for Cheer Holding, Inc. (CHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cheer Holding, Inc. grew EPS -80. 8% year-over-year, compared to -81. 9% for Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FEDU leads at 0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHR or FEDU?
Cheer Holding, Inc.
(CHR) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 2% net margin versus 0. 3% for Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHR leads at 17. 7% versus -6. 3% for FEDU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHR leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — CHR or FEDU?
In this comparison, FEDU (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. CHR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CHR or FEDU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FEDU: -88. 5%, CHR: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CHR and FEDU?
These companies operate in different sectors (CHR (Communication Services) and FEDU (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CHR is a small-cap deep-value stock; FEDU is a small-cap high-growth stock. FEDU pays a dividend while CHR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 41%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Revenue Growth>
%
(CHR: 5.4% · FEDU: 83.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CHR: 0.1x · FEDU: 18.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.