CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Market Cap$20.00B
5Y Perf.+107.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CHRW vs EXPD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Market Cap$20.11B
5Y Perf.+98.0%
CHRW vs EXPD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CHRW | EXPD |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $20.00B | $20.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.20B | $11.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $599M | $837M |
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | 9.7% |
| Forward P/E | 27.4x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.63B | $571M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $161M | $1.31B |
CHRW vs EXPD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CHRW
EXPD
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| C.H. Robinson World… (CHRW) | 100 | 207.8 | +107.8% |
| Expeditors Internat… (EXPD) | 100 | 198.0 | +98.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHRW vs EXPD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EXPD leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
The Growth Play
CHRW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -8.4%, EPS growth 25.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -13.1%
- 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs EXPD's 1.0%
- +93.7% vs EXPD's +43.9%
Best for: growth exposure
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
The Income Pick
EXPD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 1.0%
- 236.2% 10Y total return vs CHRW's 160.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 24.2%, current ratio 1.81x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EXPD | 4.4% revenue growth vs CHRW's -8.4% |
| Value | EXPD | Lower P/E (25.0x vs 27.4x), PEG 3.17 vs 5.11 |
| Quality / Margins | EXPD | 7.5% margin vs CHRW's 3.7% |
| Stability / Safety | EXPD | Beta 0.75 vs CHRW's 0.95, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CHRW | 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs EXPD's 1.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CHRW | +93.7% vs EXPD's +43.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EXPD | 17.4% ROA vs CHRW's 11.5%, ROIC 48.4% vs 18.0% |
CHRW vs EXPD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
CHRW vs EXPD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEXPDLAGGINGCHRW
CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwi…
1leads
EXPDExpeditors Internatio…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CHRWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EXPD6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
EXPD6/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EXPD8/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CHRW5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
EXPD2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXPD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHRW and EXPD operate at a comparable scale, with $16.2B and $11.2B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.5% (EXPD) to 3.7% (CHRW). On growth, EXPD holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CHRWC.H. Robinson Wor… | EXPDExpeditors Intern… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.2B | $11.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $896M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $599M | $837M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $858M | $921M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +9.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.8% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.9% | +16.3% |
EXPD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
EXPD leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.4x trailing earnings, EXPD trades at a 27% valuation discount to CHRW's 34.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EXPD offers better value at 3.22x vs CHRW's 6.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | CHRWC.H. Robinson Wor… | EXPDExpeditors Intern… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.0B | $20.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.5B | $19.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.90x | 25.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.41x | 24.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 6.51x | 3.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.91x | 17.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.23x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.10x | 8.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.35x | 21.10x |
EXPD leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPD leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPD delivers a 36.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $33 for CHRW. EXPD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHRW's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXPD scores 8/9 vs CHRW's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CHRWC.H. Robinson Wor… | EXPDExpeditors Intern… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +33.3% | +36.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.5% | +17.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.0% | +48.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.6% | +38.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | -$744M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $161M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $571M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.27x | — |
EXPD leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHRW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHRW five years ago would be worth $18,408 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,673 for EXPD. Over the past 12 months, CHRW leads with a +93.7% total return vs EXPD's +43.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHRW at 19.6% vs EXPD's 10.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CHRWC.H. Robinson Wor… | EXPDExpeditors Intern… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.4% | -0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +93.7% | +43.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.9% | +33.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.1% | +36.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +160.9% | +236.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.6% | +10.1% |
CHRW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXPD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXPD is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHRW's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXPD currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs CHRW's 82.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CHRWC.H. Robinson Wor… | EXPDExpeditors Intern… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $203.34 | $167.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $86.58 | $106.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.9% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 58.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 1.1M |
EXPD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CHRW and EXPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CHRW as "Hold" and EXPD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.1% upside for CHRW (target: $187) vs -7.3% for EXPD (target: $140). For income investors, CHRW offers the higher dividend yield at 1.47% vs EXPD's 1.01%.
| Metric | CHRWC.H. Robinson Wor… | EXPDExpeditors Intern… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $187.38 | $140.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 31 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.48 | $1.52 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +3.3% |
Evenly matched — CHRW and EXPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
EXPD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CHRW leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallExpeditors International of… (EXPD)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CHRW vs EXPD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHRW or EXPD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is the stronger pick with 4. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) offers the better valuation at 25. 4x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) a "Hold" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHRW or EXPD?
On trailing P/E, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is the cheapest at 25. 4x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. wins at 3. 17x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 's 5. 11x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHRW or EXPD?
Over the past 5 years, C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) delivered a total return of +84. 1%, compared to +36. 7% for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPD returned +236. 2% versus CHRW's +160. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHRW or EXPD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning CHRW is approximately 26% more volatile than EXPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 88% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHRW or EXPD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is pulling ahead at 4. 4% versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. grew EPS 25. 1% year-over-year, compared to 4. 0% for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHRW leads at -13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHRW or EXPD?
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXPD leads at 9. 5% versus 4. 9% for CHRW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXPD leads at 15. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHRW or EXPD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 17x versus C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 's 5. 11x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 27. 4x for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHRW: 11. 1% to $187. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHRW or EXPD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 1. 0% for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD).
09Is CHRW or EXPD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
(EXPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 0% yield, +236. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPD: +236. 2%, CHRW: +160. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHRW and EXPD?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CHRW: -0.8% · EXPD: 4.4%)Net Margin>
%
(CHRW: 3.7% · EXPD: 7.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CHRW: 34.9x · EXPD: 25.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.