Diversified Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CIG vs SBS vs ELP vs ERJ vs AWK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Diversified Utilities
Aerospace & Defense
Regulated Water
CIG vs SBS vs ELP vs ERJ vs AWK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Diversified Utilities | Regulated Water | Diversified Utilities | Aerospace & Defense | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $6.84B | $21.77B | $7M | $12.00B | $24.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42.79B | $37.34B | $24.95B | $7.26B | $5.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.93B | $8.30B | $2.21B | $315M | $1.10B |
| Gross Margin | 14.3% | 36.6% | 17.3% | 18.2% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 32.2% | 31.3% | 9.2% | 36.5% |
| Forward P/E | 1.9x | 0.7x | 3.0x | 4.4x | 20.7x |
| Total Debt | $19.87B | $39.99B | $17.57B | $2.60B | $15.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.90B | $4.67B | $4.16B | $1.56B | $119M |
CIG vs SBS vs ELP vs ERJ vs AWK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Companhia Energétic… (CIG) | 100 | 236.6 | +136.6% |
| Companhia de Saneam… (SBS) | 100 | 316.9 | +216.9% |
| Companhia Paranaens… (ELP) | 100 | 218.6 | +118.6% |
| Embraer S.A. (ERJ) | 100 | 1172.5 | +1072.5% |
| American Water Work… (AWK) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIG vs SBS vs ELP vs ERJ vs AWK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CIG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 11.5%
- 11.5% yield, vs AWK's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SBS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs ELP's 334.7%
- PEG 0.01 vs AWK's 2.63
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 20.7x), PEG 0.01 vs 2.63
- 22.2% margin vs ERJ's 4.3%
ELP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 68.6%, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.56, yield 4.3%, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.56 vs ERJ's 0.87, lower leverage
ERJ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 118.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- 21.4% revenue growth vs SBS's 3.3%
Among these 5 stocks, AWK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.4% revenue growth vs SBS's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 20.7x), PEG 0.01 vs 2.63 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs ERJ's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs ERJ's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.5% yield, vs AWK's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.9% vs AWK's -12.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs ERJ's 2.6%, ROIC 13.1% vs 11.4% |
CIG vs SBS vs ELP vs ERJ vs AWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CIG vs SBS vs ELP vs ERJ vs AWK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SBS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ELP leads 1 • CIG leads 0 • ERJ leads 0 • AWK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SBS and AWK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIG is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.8B annually — 8.2x AWK's $5.2B. SBS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ERJ's 4.3%. On growth, ERJ holds the edge at +20.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42.8B | $37.3B | $24.9B | $7.3B | $5.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.5B | $14.2B | $9.3B | $893M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.9B | $8.3B | $2.2B | $315M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.6B | $13.1B | -$3.7B | $703M | -$1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | +36.6% | +17.3% | +18.2% | +43.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +32.2% | +31.3% | +9.2% | +36.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +22.2% | +8.9% | +4.3% | +21.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +35.0% | -14.6% | +9.7% | -23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.1% | -26.9% | +18.8% | +20.4% | +5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.6% | +10.6% | -70.7% | -33.3% | -3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ELP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.0x trailing earnings, ELP trades at a 91% valuation discount to ERJ's 34.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SBS offers better value at 0.24x vs AWK's 2.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.8B | $21.8B | $7M | $12.0B | $24.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.5B | $28.9B | $13.4B | $13.0B | $40.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.96x | 13.03x | 2.97x | 34.08x | 22.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.85x | 0.66x | — | 4.42x | 20.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.62x | 0.24x | — | — | 2.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.00x | 10.08x | 2.46x | 14.31x | 14.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.81x | 2.89x | 0.00x | 1.88x | 4.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 2.55x | 0.27x | 3.59x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 29.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SBS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SBS delivers a 20.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $9 for ELP. ELP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AWK's 1.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ERJ scores 8/9 vs SBS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.3% | +20.2% | +8.5% | +8.8% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | +8.8% | +3.6% | +2.6% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.5% | +13.1% | +8.4% | +11.4% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.0% | +15.2% | +8.7% | +9.2% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 0.94x | 0.69x | 0.78x | 1.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18.0B | $35.3B | $13.4B | $1.0B | $15.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $4.7B | $4.2B | $1.6B | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.9B | $40.0B | $17.6B | $2.6B | $15.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.75x | 2.86x | 1.94x | 2.01x | 3.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SBS five years ago would be worth $51,513 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,192 for AWK. Over the past 12 months, SBS leads with a +73.9% total return vs AWK's -12.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ERJ at 71.7% vs AWK's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.8% | +34.1% | — | 0.0% | -2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.5% | +73.9% | +19.7% | +39.9% | -12.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.8% | +326.8% | +72.1% | +405.9% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.5% | +415.1% | +166.8% | +412.7% | -8.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +315.8% | +528.6% | +334.7% | +200.2% | +100.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.9% | +62.2% | +19.8% | +71.7% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ERJ and AWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWK is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ERJ's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ERJ currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs SBS's 23.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.82x | 0.56x | 0.87x | -0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.76 | $26.61 | $11.23 | $67.44 | $150.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.75 | $3.78 | $8.07 | $45.20 | $121.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.6% | +23.9% | +82.5% | +97.0% | +84.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 52.8 | 44.1 | 52.4 | 33.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.6M | 19.2M | 756K | 525K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CIG and AWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CIG as "Buy", SBS as "Hold", ERJ as "Buy", AWK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 273.5% upside for SBS (target: $24) vs -38.8% for ERJ (target: $40). For income investors, CIG offers the higher dividend yield at 11.49% vs SBS's 2.15%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.10 | $23.79 | — | $40.04 | $134.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 7 | — | 21 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.5% | +2.1% | +4.3% | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.36 | $0.68 | $0.39 | — | $3.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SBS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ELP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CIG vs SBS vs ELP vs ERJ vs AWK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIG or SBS or ELP or ERJ or AWK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Embraer S.
A. (ERJ) is the stronger pick with 21. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS). Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL (ELP) offers the better valuation at 3. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CIG or SBS or ELP or ERJ or AWK?
On trailing P/E, Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL (ELP) is the cheapest at 3.
0x versus Embraer S. A. at 34. 1x. On forward P/E, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP is actually cheaper at 0. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP wins at 0. 01x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CIG or SBS or ELP or ERJ or AWK?
Over the past 5 years, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) delivered a total return of +415.
1%, compared to -8. 1% for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBS returned +528. 6% versus AWK's +100. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CIG or SBS or ELP or ERJ or AWK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 48β versus Embraer S. A. 's 0. 87β — meaning ERJ is approximately -283% more volatile than AWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL (ELP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 147% for American Water Works Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CIG or SBS or ELP or ERJ or AWK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Embraer S.
A. (ERJ) is pulling ahead at 21. 4% versus 3. 3% for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Embraer S. A. grew EPS 118. 2% year-over-year, compared to -31. 7% for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais. Over a 3-year CAGR, SBS leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CIG or SBS or ELP or ERJ or AWK?
Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
2% net margin versus 5. 5% for Embraer S. A. — meaning it keeps 22. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWK leads at 36. 6% versus 10. 4% for ERJ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWK leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CIG or SBS or ELP or ERJ or AWK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for American Water Works Company, Inc. — 20. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBS: 273. 5% to $23. 79.
08Which pays a better dividend — CIG or SBS or ELP or ERJ or AWK?
In this comparison, CIG (11.
5% yield), ELP (4. 3% yield), AWK (2. 6% yield), SBS (2. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ERJ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CIG or SBS or ELP or ERJ or AWK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 48), 2. 6% yield, +100. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWK: +100. 9%, ERJ: +200. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CIG and SBS and ELP and ERJ and AWK?
These companies operate in different sectors (CIG (Utilities) and SBS (Utilities) and ELP (Utilities) and ERJ (Industrials) and AWK (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CIG is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ELP is a small-cap deep-value stock; ERJ is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AWK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CIG, SBS, ELP, AWK pay a dividend while ERJ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.