Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CIGL vs TAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
CIGL vs TAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $44M | $771M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $2.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-84M | $171M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | -8.0% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.1x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $333M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $1.77B |
CIGL vs TAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concorde Internatio… (CIGL) | 100 | 47.4 | -52.6% |
| TAL Education Group (TAL) | 100 | 129.9 | +29.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIGL vs TAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, CIGL is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
TAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.96
- Rev growth 51.2%, EPS growth 24.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -20.0%
- 27.3% 10Y total return vs CIGL's -50.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.2% revenue growth vs CIGL's -1.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs CIGL's -8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs CIGL's 3.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.9% vs CIGL's -71.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs CIGL's -8.9%, ROIC -0.3% vs -8.9% |
CIGL vs TAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CIGL vs TAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TAL leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.7B annually — 253.2x CIGL's $10M. TAL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CIGL's -8.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $441M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +54.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | +6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.4% | +16.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +38.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -21.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TAL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $771M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $50M | -$667M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.53x | 9.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -16.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.20x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.49x | 0.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TAL leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TAL delivers a 4.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-34 for CIGL. TAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIGL's 2.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TAL scores 5/9 vs CIGL's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.7% | +4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.9% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.9% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.6% | -0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.88x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $333M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -382.50x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIGL five years ago would be worth $4,975 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,033 for TAL. Over the past 12 months, TAL leads with a +23.9% total return vs CIGL's -71.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TAL at 26.7% vs CIGL's -20.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.1% | -0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -71.3% | +23.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.3% | +103.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.3% | -79.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.3% | +27.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.8% | +26.7% |
Risk & Volatility
TAL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIGL's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TAL currently trades 85.3% from its 52-week high vs CIGL's 6.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.40x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.06 | $13.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.40 | $9.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.4% | +85.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.7 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 81K | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% |
TAL leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
CIGL vs TAL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIGL or TAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the stronger pick with 51.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (CIGL). TAL Education Group (TAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TAL Education Group (TAL) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CIGL or TAL?
Over the past 5 years, Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (CIGL) delivered a total return of -50.
3%, compared to -79. 7% for TAL Education Group (TAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TAL returned +27. 3% versus CIGL's -50. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CIGL or TAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TAL Education Group (TAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
96β versus Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares's 3. 40β — meaning CIGL is approximately 254% more volatile than TAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TAL Education Group (TAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CIGL or TAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TAL Education Group (TAL) is pulling ahead at 51.
2% versus -1. 6% for Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (CIGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAL Education Group grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -88. 1% for Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CIGL or TAL?
TAL Education Group (TAL) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
8% net margin versus -797. 3% for Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TAL leads at -0. 3% versus -797. 2% for CIGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TAL leads at 53. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CIGL or TAL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CIGL or TAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
96)). Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (CIGL) carries a higher beta of 3. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAL: +27. 3%, CIGL: -50. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CIGL and TAL?
These companies operate in different sectors (CIGL (Industrials) and TAL (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CIGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.