CIX
CompX International Inc.
Security & Protection Services
Market Cap$293M
5Y Perf.+68.8%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CIX vs FBIN vs MAS vs ALLE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.68B
5Y Perf.-25.0%
MAS
Masco Corporation
Construction
Market Cap$14.51B
5Y Perf.+54.2%
ALLE
Allegion plc
Security & Protection Services
Market Cap$11.76B
5Y Perf.+37.2%
CIX vs FBIN vs MAS vs ALLE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CIX | FBIN | MAS | ALLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Construction | Construction | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $293M | $4.68B | $14.51B | $11.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $159M | $3.36B | $7.68B | $4.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $195M | $837M | $634M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 45.6% | 35.4% | 45.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 10.6% | 16.8% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 88.0x | 11.5x | 16.9x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.54B | $3.44B | $2.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $54M | $264M | $647M | $356M |
CIX vs FBIN vs MAS vs ALLE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CIX
FBIN
MAS
ALLE
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CompX International… (CIX) | 100 | 168.8 | +68.8% |
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 137.2 | +37.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIX vs FBIN vs MAS vs ALLE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CIX leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Masco Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. FBIN and ALLE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CIX
CompX International Inc.
The Income Pick
CIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 9.3%
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth 17.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.7%
- 223.2% 10Y total return vs MAS's 152.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, current ratio 5.87x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Value Play
FBIN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 16.9x), PEG 2.77 vs 3.40
Best for: value
MAS
Masco Corporation
The Momentum Pick
MAS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +21.1% vs FBIN's -16.8%
- 15.9% ROA vs FBIN's 3.0%, ROIC 35.4% vs 8.1%
Best for: momentum and efficiency
ALLE
Allegion plc
The Value Pick
ALLE is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.92 vs CIX's 6.40
- 15.2% margin vs FBIN's 5.8%
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CIX | 8.5% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4% |
| Value | FBIN | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 16.9x), PEG 2.77 vs 3.40 |
| Quality / Margins | ALLE | 15.2% margin vs FBIN's 5.8% |
| Stability / Safety | CIX | Beta 0.50 vs FBIN's 1.61 |
| Dividends | CIX | 9.3% yield, vs MAS's 1.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MAS | +21.1% vs FBIN's -16.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MAS | 15.9% ROA vs FBIN's 3.0%, ROIC 35.4% vs 8.1% |
CIX vs FBIN vs MAS vs ALLE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
CIX vs FBIN vs MAS vs ALLE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCIXLAGGINGALLE
Who Leads Where
ALLE leads in 1 of 6 categories
FBIN leads 1 • MAS leads 1 • CIX leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓ALLEAllegion plc
1leads
MASMasco Corporation
1leads
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
1leads
CIXCompX International I…
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FBINvs MASMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ALLE4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBIN4/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MAS5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CIX4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAS is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.7B annually — 48.4x CIX's $159M. ALLE is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBIN's 5.8%. On growth, ALLE holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CIXCompX Internation… | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | ALLEAllegion plc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $159M | $3.4B | $7.7B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $482M | $1.4B | $959M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $195M | $837M | $634M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $420M | $943M | $704M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +45.6% | +35.4% | +45.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +10.6% | +16.8% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +5.8% | +10.9% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +12.5% | +12.3% | +16.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.7% | -106.4% | +6.5% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | -2.0% | +20.7% | -7.0% |
ALLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, CIX trades at a 19% valuation discount to MAS's 18.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALLE offers better value at 1.08x vs MAS's 3.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | CIXCompX Internation… | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | ALLEAllegion plc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $293M | $4.7B | $14.5B | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $239M | $7.0B | $17.3B | $13.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.03x | 15.82x | 18.63x | 18.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 87.96x | 11.50x | 16.85x | 15.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.09x | 2.77x | 3.76x | 1.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.09x | 10.08x | 12.18x | 13.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 1.05x | 1.92x | 2.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 1.98x | 201.40x | 5.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.30x | 12.77x | 16.76x | 17.14x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $8 for FBIN. FBIN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIN scores 7/9 vs ALLE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CIXCompX Internation… | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | ALLEAllegion plc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.3% | +8.3% | +8.0% | +32.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.8% | +3.0% | +15.9% | +12.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.0% | +8.1% | +35.4% | +18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.8% | +9.9% | +35.9% | +20.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.07x | 45.81x | 1.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$54M | $2.3B | $2.8B | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54M | $264M | $647M | $356M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.5B | $3.4B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.72x | 12.60x | 8.61x |
MAS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIX five years ago would be worth $14,600 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,599 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, MAS leads with a +21.1% total return vs FBIN's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIX at 16.1% vs FBIN's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CIXCompX Internation… | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | ALLEAllegion plc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.6% | -22.8% | +12.1% | -14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.2% | -16.8% | +21.1% | -1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.6% | -36.3% | +40.1% | +32.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.0% | -54.0% | +16.1% | +3.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +223.2% | -2.4% | +152.1% | +127.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | -13.9% | +11.9% | +9.9% |
CIX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CIX and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIX is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIN's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAS currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CIXCompX Internation… | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | ALLEAllegion plc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 1.61x | 1.28x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.30 | $64.84 | $79.19 | $183.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.29 | $36.07 | $58.16 | $131.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.5% | +60.3% | +90.8% | +74.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.7 | 46.8 | 59.6 | 38.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 2.6M | 2.7M | 887K |
Evenly matched — CIX and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CIX and MAS and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FBIN as "Hold", MAS as "Buy", ALLE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.1% upside for FBIN (target: $60) vs 14.5% for MAS (target: $82). For income investors, CIX offers the higher dividend yield at 9.26% vs ALLE's 1.48%.
| Metric | CIXCompX Internation… | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | ALLEAllegion plc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $59.83 | $82.36 | $172.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 38 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.3% | +2.5% | +1.7% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.20 | $1.00 | $1.24 | $2.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.3% | +3.9% | +0.7% |
Evenly matched — CIX and MAS and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ALLE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FBIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallCompX International Inc. (CIX)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CIX vs FBIN vs MAS vs ALLE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIX or FBIN or MAS or ALLE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). CompX International Inc. (CIX) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (88. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Masco Corporation (MAS) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CIX or FBIN or MAS or ALLE?
On trailing P/E, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Masco Corporation at 18. 6x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allegion plc wins at 0. 92x versus CompX International Inc. 's 6. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CIX or FBIN or MAS or ALLE?
Over the past 5 years, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) delivered a total return of +46. 0%, compared to -54. 0% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIX returned +223. 2% versus FBIN's -2. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CIX or FBIN or MAS or ALLE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning FBIN is approximately 222% more volatile than CIX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 107% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CIX or FBIN or MAS or ALLE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CompX International Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -34. 1% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALLE leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CIX or FBIN or MAS or ALLE?
Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus 6. 7% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALLE leads at 21. 1% versus 11. 6% for FBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLE leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CIX or FBIN or MAS or ALLE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus CompX International Inc. 's 6. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 88. 0x for CompX International Inc. — 76. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIN: 53. 1% to $59. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — CIX or FBIN or MAS or ALLE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CompX International Inc. (CIX) offers the highest yield at 9. 3%, versus 1. 5% for Allegion plc (ALLE).
09Is CIX or FBIN or MAS or ALLE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 9. 3% yield, +223. 2% 10Y return). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIX: +223. 2%, FBIN: -2. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CIX and FBIN and MAS and ALLE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALLE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CIX: 0.7% · FBIN: -106.4%)Net Margin>
%
(CIX: 12.7% · FBIN: 5.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CIX: 15.0x · FBIN: 15.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.