Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CJMB vs HLI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
CJMB vs HLI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $5M | $10.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $2.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $448M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | 38.5% |
| Operating Margin | -98.0% | 21.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $907K | $438M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $971M |
CJMB vs HLI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CALLAN JMB INC. (CJMB) | 100 | 25.9 | -74.1% |
| Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CJMB vs HLI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CJMB is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.07, yield 100.0%, current ratio 2.59x
- Better valuation composite
- 100.0% yield, vs HLI's 1.6%
HLI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.6%
- Rev growth 24.8%, EPS growth 41.6%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs CJMB's -71.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.8% NII/revenue growth vs CJMB's -50.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.7% margin vs CJMB's -112.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs CJMB's 1.07, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs HLI's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.1% vs CJMB's -75.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs CJMB's -86.1%, ROIC 15.5% vs -56.7% |
CJMB vs HLI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CJMB vs HLI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HLI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HLI is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 404.0x CJMB's $6M. HLI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CJMB's -112.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $591M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $448M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $739M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.7% | +38.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -98.0% | +21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -112.7% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -88.4% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -125.9% | +22.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CJMB leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $10.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $10.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.31x | 26.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | 4.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 4.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.66x | 13.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HLI leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HLI delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-160 for CJMB. HLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CJMB's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLI scores 7/9 vs CJMB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -159.6% | +20.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -86.1% | +11.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -56.7% | +15.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.7% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$533M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $971M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $907,450 | $438M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12383.11x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HLI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HLI five years ago would be worth $24,153 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,850 for CJMB. Over the past 12 months, HLI leads with a -5.1% total return vs CJMB's -75.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HLI at 22.9% vs CJMB's -34.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.8% | -12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.8% | -5.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.5% | +85.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.5% | +141.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.5% | +603.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.2% | +22.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HLI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HLI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CJMB's 1.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HLI currently trades 72.5% from its 52-week high vs CJMB's 19.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.88 | $211.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.86 | $134.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.4% | +72.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 36.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 161K | 606K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CJMB and HLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CJMB offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs HLI's 1.57%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $200.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | $2.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
HLI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CJMB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CJMB vs HLI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CJMB or HLI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
(HLI) is the stronger pick with 24. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -50. 3% for CALLAN JMB INC. (CJMB). Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (19. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CJMB or HLI?
Over the past 5 years, Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
(HLI) delivered a total return of +141. 5%, compared to -71. 5% for CALLAN JMB INC. (CJMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLI returned +603. 4% versus CJMB's -71. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CJMB or HLI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
(HLI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus CALLAN JMB INC. 's 1. 07β — meaning CJMB is approximately 14% more volatile than HLI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 29% for CALLAN JMB INC. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CJMB or HLI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
(HLI) is pulling ahead at 24. 8% versus -50. 3% for CALLAN JMB INC. (CJMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Houlihan Lokey, Inc. grew EPS 41. 6% year-over-year, compared to -297. 7% for CALLAN JMB INC.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CJMB or HLI?
Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
(HLI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus -34. 9% for CALLAN JMB INC. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLI leads at 21. 0% versus -34. 7% for CJMB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CJMB leads at 39. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CJMB or HLI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CALLAN JMB INC. (CJMB) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 1. 6% for Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI).
07Is CJMB or HLI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
(HLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 6% yield, +603. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HLI: +603. 4%, CJMB: -71. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CJMB and HLI?
These companies operate in different sectors (CJMB (Industrials) and HLI (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CJMB is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HLI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.