Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CJMB vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LAZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Financial - Capital Markets
CJMB vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LAZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $5M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $4.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $72M | $71M | $3.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $237M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 31.8% |
| Operating Margin | -98.0% | -121.4% | -405.7% | 13.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | — | 14.5x |
| Total Debt | $907K | $8.76B | $32M | $2.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $1.50B |
CJMB vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LAZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CALLAN JMB INC. (CJMB) | 100 | 25.9 | -74.1% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 141.3 | +41.3% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 241.0 | +141.0% |
| Lazard Ltd (LAZ) | 100 | 92.6 | -7.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CJMB vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LAZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CJMB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 28.6%, current ratio 2.59x
- Beta 1.07, yield 100.0%, current ratio 2.59x
- Beta 1.07 vs SPIR's 2.93
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs LAZ's 100.4%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs CJMB's -50.3%
- +158.1% vs CJMB's -75.8%
LAZ is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 7.4% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- 5.2% ROA vs CJMB's -86.1%, ROIC 9.5% vs -56.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs CJMB's -50.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.4% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs LAZ's 3.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs CJMB's -75.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs CJMB's -86.1%, ROIC 9.5% vs -56.7% |
CJMB vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LAZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CJMB vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LAZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LAZ leads in 2 of 6 categories
CJMB leads 1 • ASTS leads 1 • SPIR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 538.8x CJMB's $6M. LAZ is the more profitable business, keeping 7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $72M | $71M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$74M | -$237M | $384M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$25.0B | -$342M | $237M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | $519M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.7% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +31.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -98.0% | -121.4% | -4.1% | +13.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -112.7% | -349.6% | -4.8% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -88.4% | -227.0% | -16.0% | +15.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.8% | -26.9% | +27.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -125.9% | +59.5% | -55.6% | -43.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CJMB leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 53% valuation discount to LAZ's 21.4x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $513.8B | $16.8B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.31x | 10.01x | -48.76x | 21.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 14.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 12.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 1.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 4.56x | 5.68x | 4.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.66x | — | — | 8.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LAZ leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAZ delivers a 26.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-160 for CJMB. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LAZ's 2.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs CJMB's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -159.6% | -88.4% | -21.1% | +26.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -86.1% | -47.3% | -12.6% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -56.7% | -0.1% | -47.1% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.7% | -0.1% | -10.0% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 2.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $907,450 | $8.8B | $32M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12383.11x | 9.20x | -21.20x | 4.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,035 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs CJMB's -75.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs CJMB's -34.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.8% | +106.4% | -21.7% | -5.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.8% | +73.1% | +158.1% | +17.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.5% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | +80.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.5% | -79.6% | +688.2% | +20.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.5% | -78.8% | +568.8% | +100.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.2% | +43.9% | +134.8% | +21.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CJMB and LAZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CJMB is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LAZ currently trades 79.0% from its 52-week high vs CJMB's 19.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.88 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $58.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.86 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $38.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.4% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +79.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 161K | 1.6M | 14.9M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CJMB and LAZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", LAZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs 1.9% for LAZ (target: $47). For income investors, CJMB offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs LAZ's 3.78%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 | $103.65 | $47.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 7 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | — | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | — | — | $1.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.1% |
LAZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CJMB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CJMB vs SPIR vs ASTS vs LAZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CJMB or SPIR or ASTS or LAZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -50. 3% for CALLAN JMB INC. (CJMB). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CJMB or SPIR or ASTS or LAZ?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Lazard Ltd at 21. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CJMB or SPIR or ASTS or LAZ?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -79. 6% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus SPIR's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CJMB or SPIR or ASTS or LAZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CALLAN JMB INC.
(CJMB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 173% more volatile than CJMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Lazard Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CJMB or SPIR or ASTS or LAZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -50. 3% for CALLAN JMB INC. (CJMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -297. 7% for CALLAN JMB INC.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CJMB or SPIR or ASTS or LAZ?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAZ leads at 13. 0% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CJMB or SPIR or ASTS or LAZ more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASTS: 58.
6% to $103. 65.
08Which pays a better dividend — CJMB or SPIR or ASTS or LAZ?
In this comparison, CJMB (100.
0% yield), LAZ (3. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SPIR, ASTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CJMB or SPIR or ASTS or LAZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CALLAN JMB INC.
(CJMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07), 100. 0% yield). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CJMB: -71. 5%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CJMB and SPIR and ASTS and LAZ?
These companies operate in different sectors (CJMB (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and LAZ (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CJMB is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LAZ is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CJMB, LAZ pay a dividend while SPIR, ASTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.