CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
Household & Personal Products
Market Cap$70.09B
5Y Perf.+20.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CL vs ENR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ENR
Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$1.27B
5Y Perf.-57.7%
CL vs ENR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CL | ENR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $70.09B | $1.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.38B | $2.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.13B | $195M |
| Gross Margin | 60.1% | 40.9% |
| Operating Margin | 21.3% | 15.8% |
| Forward P/E | 22.9x | 5.6x |
| Total Debt | $7.99B | $3.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.29B | $236M |
CL vs ENR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CL
ENR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colgate-Palmolive C… (CL) | 100 | 120.8 | +20.8% |
| Energizer Holdings,… (ENR) | 100 | 42.3 | -57.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CL vs ENR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Energizer Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
The Long-Run Compounder
CL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 47.0% 10Y total return vs ENR's -31.3%
- 10.5% margin vs ENR's 6.5%
- 2.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ENR's 6.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
ENR
Energizer Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick
ENR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 6.5%
- Rev growth 2.3%, EPS growth 5.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, current ratio 2.11x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ENR | 2.3% revenue growth vs CL's 1.4% |
| Value | ENR | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 22.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | CL | 10.5% margin vs ENR's 6.5% |
| Stability / Safety | ENR | Lower D/E ratio (20.8% vs 21.9%) |
| Dividends | CL | 2.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ENR's 6.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CL | -1.6% vs ENR's -9.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CL | 12.5% ROA vs ENR's 4.4%, ROIC 43.4% vs 11.8% |
CL vs ENR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
CL vs ENR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCLLAGGINGENR
ENREnergizer Holdings, I…
1leads
CLColgate-Palmolive Com…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ENRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CL5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ENR5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CL5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CL6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CL2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CL is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.4B annually — 6.8x ENR's $3.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.5% (CL) to 6.5% (ENR). On growth, CL holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CLColgate-Palmolive… | ENREnergizer Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20.4B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.9B | $566M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.1B | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.6B | $159M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.1% | +40.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | +15.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | -3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -105.1% | -61.5% |
CL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ENR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, ENR trades at a 83% valuation discount to CL's 33.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ENR's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CL's 15.4x.
| Metric | CLColgate-Palmolive… | ENREnergizer Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70.1B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $76.8B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.22x | 5.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.88x | 5.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.43x | 6.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.44x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 194.13x | 7.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.29x | 20.09x |
ENR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CL leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CL delivers a 2.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $117 for ENR. ENR carries lower financial leverage with a 20.79x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CL's 21.88x.
| Metric | CLColgate-Palmolive… | ENREnergizer Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | +116.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.5% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +43.4% | +11.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +41.6% | +14.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 21.88x | 20.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.7B | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $236M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.0B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.37x | 2.85x |
CL leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CL five years ago would be worth $11,818 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,857 for ENR. Over the past 12 months, CL leads with a -1.6% total return vs ENR's -9.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CL at 5.0% vs ENR's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CLColgate-Palmolive… | ENREnergizer Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.8% | -5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.6% | -9.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.7% | -36.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.2% | -51.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.0% | -31.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.0% | -13.9% |
CL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CL is the less volatile stock with a -0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENR's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CL currently trades 87.9% from its 52-week high vs ENR's 61.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CLColgate-Palmolive… | ENREnergizer Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.00x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $99.33 | $30.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $74.55 | $16.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.9% | +61.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.6M | 1.1M |
CL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CL and ENR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CL as "Hold" and ENR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.1% upside for ENR (target: $23) vs 7.3% for CL (target: $94). For income investors, ENR offers the higher dividend yield at 6.52% vs CL's 2.57%.
| Metric | CLColgate-Palmolive… | ENREnergizer Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $93.70 | $23.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 45 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +6.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.25 | $1.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +7.1% |
Evenly matched — CL and ENR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ENR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallColgate-Palmolive Company (CL)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CL vs ENR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CL or ENR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energizer Holdings, Inc.
(ENR) is the stronger pick with 2. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (5. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) a "Hold" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CL or ENR?
On trailing P/E, Energizer Holdings, Inc.
(ENR) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Colgate-Palmolive Company at 33. 2x. On forward P/E, Energizer Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CL or ENR?
Over the past 5 years, Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) delivered a total return of +18.
2%, compared to -51. 4% for Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CL returned +47. 0% versus ENR's -31. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CL or ENR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
00β versus Energizer Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 24β — meaning ENR is approximately -28339% more volatile than CL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 22% for Colgate-Palmolive Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CL or ENR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energizer Holdings, Inc.
(ENR) is pulling ahead at 2. 3% versus 1. 4% for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Energizer Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 538. 5% year-over-year, compared to -25. 1% for Colgate-Palmolive Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CL leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CL or ENR?
Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus 8. 1% for Energizer Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CL leads at 21. 3% versus 17. 8% for ENR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CL leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CL or ENR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Energizer Holdings, Inc.
(ENR) trades at 5. 6x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for Colgate-Palmolive Company — 17. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENR: 25. 1% to $23. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — CL or ENR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 2. 6% for Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL).
09Is CL or ENR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
00), 2. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CL: +47. 0%, ENR: -31. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CL and ENR?
These companies operate in different sectors (CL (Consumer Defensive) and ENR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ENR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CL: 5.8% · ENR: -3.0%)Net Margin>
%
(CL: 10.5% · ENR: 6.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CL: 33.2x · ENR: 5.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.