Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CLBK vs NFBK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CLBK vs NFBK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.02B | $588M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $453M | $251M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $39M |
| Gross Margin | 36.5% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | -3.5% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 26.1x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.08B | $760M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $289M | $168M |
CLBK vs NFBK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia Financial,… (CLBK) | 100 | 137.0 | +37.0% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLBK vs NFBK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLBK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.90
- 25.2% 10Y total return vs NFBK's 20.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, current ratio 0.14x
NFBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth -16.3%
- NIM 2.0% vs CLBK's 1.6%
- 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs CLBK's 7.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs CLBK's 7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 26.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CLBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs NFBK's 1.00, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.5% vs CLBK's +26.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CLBK's 0.4% |
CLBK vs NFBK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLBK vs NFBK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFBK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLBK is the larger business by revenue, generating $453M annually — 1.8x NFBK's $251M. NFBK is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLBK's -2.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $453M | $251M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $39M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $64M | $42M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +49.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +147.1% | +68.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NFBK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $588M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -175.55x | 19.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.09x | 10.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.46x | 2.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.82x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 78.17x | 19.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFBK leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFBK delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $1 for CLBK. CLBK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFBK's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFBK scores 7/9 vs CLBK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.3% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $791M | $592M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $289M | $168M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $760M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.06x | 0.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLBK five years ago would be worth $10,657 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,018 for NFBK. Over the past 12 months, NFBK leads with a +31.5% total return vs CLBK's +26.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFBK at 18.3% vs CLBK's 7.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.2% | +26.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.3% | +31.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.6% | +65.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.6% | +0.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.2% | +20.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.0% | +18.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLBK and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFBK's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.74 | $14.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.66 | $9.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.7 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 257K | 258K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CLBK as "Hold" and NFBK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.1% upside for NFBK (target: $15) vs -12.0% for CLBK (target: $17). NFBK is the only dividend payer here at 3.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.52 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +3.2% |
NFBK leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
CLBK vs NFBK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLBK or NFBK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 3% for Columbia Financial, Inc. (CLBK). Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Columbia Financial, Inc. (CLBK) a "Hold" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLBK or NFBK?
On forward P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 10. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLBK or NFBK?
Over the past 5 years, Columbia Financial, Inc.
(CLBK) delivered a total return of +6. 6%, compared to +0. 2% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLBK returned +25. 2% versus NFBK's +20. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLBK or NFBK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Columbia Financial, Inc.
(CLBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning NFBK is approximately 10% more volatile than CLBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Columbia Financial, Inc. (CLBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 100% versus 108% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLBK or NFBK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus 7. 3% for Columbia Financial, Inc. (CLBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Northfield Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS -16. 3% year-over-year, compared to -131. 4% for Columbia Financial, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLBK or NFBK?
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 9% net margin versus -2. 6% for Columbia Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFBK leads at 16. 1% versus -3. 5% for CLBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFBK leads at 49. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLBK or NFBK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Columbia Financial, Inc. — 15. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFBK: 3. 1% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLBK or NFBK?
In this comparison, NFBK (3.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CLBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLBK or NFBK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 3. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFBK: +20. 6%, CLBK: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLBK and NFBK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NFBK pays a dividend while CLBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.