Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CLFD vs CALX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
CLFD vs CALX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $419M | $2.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $34M |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 58.2x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $26M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $143M |
CLFD vs CALX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 218.9 | +118.9% |
| Calix, Inc. (CALX) | 100 | 314.5 | +214.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLFD vs CALX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, CLFD is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
CALX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.99
- Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs CLFD's 66.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.3% revenue growth vs CLFD's 19.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.0x vs 58.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs CLFD's -6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs CLFD's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.9% vs CLFD's -2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs CLFD's -3.0%, ROIC 2.1% vs 0.6% |
CLFD vs CALX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CLFD vs CALX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CALX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CALX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 7.8x CLFD's $136M. CALX is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLFD's -6.3%. On growth, CALX holds the edge at +27.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | $57M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15M | $109M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.3% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +10.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.1% | +27.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -142.5% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CLFD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CLFD's 49.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CALX's 71.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $419M | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $407M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -52.21x | 170.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 58.23x | 24.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 49.34x | 70.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.79x | 2.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.65x | 3.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.97x | 24.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CALX leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CALX delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CLFD. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLFD's 0.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs CALX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.4% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.8% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $143M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $26M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 85.32x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CALX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CALX five years ago would be worth $9,570 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,818 for CLFD. Over the past 12 months, CALX leads with a +5.9% total return vs CLFD's -2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CALX at 1.3% vs CLFD's -5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | -17.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.1% | +5.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.1% | +4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.8% | -4.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.7% | +534.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.7% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLFD and CALX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CALX is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLFD's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.76 | $71.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.01 | $40.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.8% | +62.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 47.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 132K | 937K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CLFD as "Buy" and CALX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.0% upside for CLFD (target: $43) vs 37.6% for CALX (target: $61).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.00 | $61.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | +3.3% |
CALX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLFD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CLFD vs CALX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLFD or CALX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the stronger pick with 20. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 6% for Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD). Calix, Inc. (CALX) offers the better valuation at 170. 5x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLFD or CALX?
On forward P/E, Calix, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 25. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLFD or CALX?
Over the past 5 years, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) delivered a total return of -4. 3%, compared to -21. 8% for Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CALX returned +534. 3% versus CLFD's +66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLFD or CALX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Clearfield, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning CLFD is approximately 80% more volatile than CALX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Clearfield, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLFD or CALX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is pulling ahead at 20. 3% versus 19. 6% for Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calix, Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to 31. 8% for Clearfield, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CALX leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLFD or CALX?
Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 8% net margin versus -5. 4% for Clearfield, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CALX leads at 2. 1% versus 1. 4% for CLFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CALX leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLFD or CALX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 58. 2x for Clearfield, Inc. — 33. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLFD: 42. 0% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLFD or CALX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CLFD or CALX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +534. 3% 10Y return). Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CALX: +534. 3%, CLFD: +66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLFD and CALX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.