Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CLIK vs LX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
CLIK vs LX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $6M | $148M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $14.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $803K | $1.61B |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 16.0% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 2.9x | 0.4x |
| Total Debt | $630K | $5.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $483K | $2.25B |
CLIK vs LX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Click Holdings Limi… (CLIK) | 100 | 4.4 | -95.6% |
| LexinFintech Holdin… (LX) | 100 | 66.4 | -33.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLIK vs LX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLIK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.1%, EPS growth 104.9%
- 36.1% revenue growth vs LX's 8.8%
- 14.2% margin vs LX's 7.7%
LX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 6.8%
- -73.9% 10Y total return vs CLIK's -97.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 49.0%, current ratio 1.86x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.1% revenue growth vs LX's 8.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.4x vs 2.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.2% margin vs LX's 7.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs CLIK's 2.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -70.6% vs CLIK's -72.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 50.7% ROA vs LX's 7.2%, ROIC 114.9% vs 11.0% |
CLIK vs LX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CLIK vs LX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CLIK and LX each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LX is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.2B annually — 2510.7x CLIK's $6M. CLIK is the more profitable business, keeping 14.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LX's 7.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $14.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +110.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.2x trailing earnings, LX trades at a 23% valuation discount to CLIK's 2.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LX's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLIK's 6.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $148M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $590M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.85x | 2.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.90x | 1.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.11x | 0.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.60x | 0.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.80x | 1.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLIK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLIK delivers a 5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $15 for LX. LX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLIK's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LX scores 8/9 vs CLIK's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | +14.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +50.7% | +7.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +114.9% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +19.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $147,495 | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $482,588 | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $630,083 | $5.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 283.38x | 153.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LX five years ago would be worth $3,300 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $270 for CLIK. Over the past 12 months, LX leads with a -70.6% total return vs CLIK's -72.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LX at 4.0% vs CLIK's -70.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -59.8% | -31.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -72.7% | -70.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | +12.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -67.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -73.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.0% | +4.0% |
Risk & Volatility
LX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LX is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLIK's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LX currently trades 22.2% from its 52-week high vs CLIK's 6.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.54x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.20 | $9.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.32 | $2.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.3% | +22.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 40.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
LX is the only dividend payer here at 6.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CLIK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CLIK vs LX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLIK or LX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Click Holdings Limited (CLIK) is the stronger pick with 36.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX). LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) offers the better valuation at 2. 2x trailing P/E (0. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLIK or LX?
On trailing P/E, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) is the cheapest at 2. 2x versus Click Holdings Limited at 2. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLIK or LX?
Over the past 5 years, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) delivered a total return of -67. 0%, compared to -97. 3% for Click Holdings Limited (CLIK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LX returned -73. 9% versus CLIK's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLIK or LX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus Click Holdings Limited's 2. 54β — meaning CLIK is approximately 103% more volatile than LX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 156% for Click Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLIK or LX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Click Holdings Limited (CLIK) is pulling ahead at 36.
1% versus 8. 8% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Click Holdings Limited grew EPS 104. 9% year-over-year, compared to 2. 5% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLIK or LX?
Click Holdings Limited (CLIK) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
2% net margin versus 7. 7% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps 14. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LX leads at 16. 1% versus 16. 0% for CLIK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LX leads at 35. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — CLIK or LX?
In this comparison, LX (6.
8% yield) pays a dividend. CLIK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CLIK or LX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 25), 6. 8% yield). Click Holdings Limited (CLIK) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LX: -73. 9%, CLIK: -97. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CLIK and LX?
These companies operate in different sectors (CLIK (Industrials) and LX (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CLIK is a small-cap high-growth stock; LX is a small-cap deep-value stock. LX pays a dividend while CLIK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.