CLMB
Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
Technology Distributors
Market Cap$374M
5Y Perf.+245.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CLMB vs AVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AVT
Avnet, Inc.
Technology Distributors
Market Cap$6.62B
5Y Perf.+196.8%
CLMB vs AVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CLMB | AVT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $374M | $6.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $697M | $24.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $214M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 10.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | 16.2x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $2.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $192M |
CLMB vs AVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CLMB
AVT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Climb Global Soluti… (CLMB) | 100 | 345.1 | +245.1% |
| Avnet, Inc. (AVT) | 100 | 296.8 | +196.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLMB vs AVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CLMB leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Avnet, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
The Growth Play
CLMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 40.1%, EPS growth 14.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.9%
- 435.0% 10Y total return vs AVT's 132.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 1.11x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
AVT
Avnet, Inc.
The Income Pick
AVT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 1.6%
- Beta 1.27, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.43x
- 1.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CLMB's 0.8%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CLMB | 40.1% revenue growth vs AVT's -6.6% |
| Value | CLMB | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 16.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | CLMB | 3.0% margin vs AVT's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | CLMB | Beta 0.76 vs AVT's 1.27, lower leverage |
| Dividends | AVT | 1.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CLMB's 0.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | AVT | +65.6% vs CLMB's -20.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CLMB | 4.9% ROA vs AVT's 1.7%, ROIC 29.7% vs 6.0% |
CLMB vs AVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2023
FY 2024
CLMB vs AVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCLMBLAGGINGAVT
AVTAvnet, Inc.
2leads
CLMBClimb Global Solution…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AVTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CLMB4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CLMB8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AVT4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
AVT2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLMB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVT is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.0B annually — 35.8x CLMB's $697M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.0% (CLMB) to 0.9% (AVT).
| Metric | CLMBClimb Global Solu… | AVTAvnet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $697M | $25.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $781M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $214M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +10.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.1% | +33.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.1% | +12.9% |
CLMB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CLMB and AVT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.5x trailing earnings, CLMB trades at a 41% valuation discount to AVT's 29.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLMB's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVT's 12.4x.
| Metric | CLMBClimb Global Solu… | AVTAvnet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $374M | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $341M | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.47x | 29.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.71x | 16.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.49x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.23x | 12.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.57x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.14x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.59x | 11.47x |
Evenly matched — CLMB and AVT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLMB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLMB delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $4 for AVT. CLMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVT's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVT scores 6/9 vs CLMB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CLMBClimb Global Solu… | AVTAvnet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.7% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.7% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.5% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$33M | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $192M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 415.66x | 2.80x |
CLMB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLMB five years ago would be worth $35,164 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,408 for AVT. Over the past 12 months, AVT leads with a +65.6% total return vs CLMB's -20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVT at 27.0% vs CLMB's 20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CLMBClimb Global Solu… | AVTAvnet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.4% | +64.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.2% | +65.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.0% | +105.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +251.6% | +94.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +435.0% | +132.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.5% | +27.0% |
AVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLMB and AVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVT's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVT currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs CLMB's 16.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CLMBClimb Global Solu… | AVTAvnet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $120.44 | $84.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.24 | $44.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.8% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 76.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 251K | 1.0M |
Evenly matched — CLMB and AVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
AVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CLMB as "Buy" and AVT as "Hold". For income investors, AVT offers the higher dividend yield at 1.60% vs CLMB's 0.84%.
| Metric | CLMBClimb Global Solu… | AVTAvnet, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $79.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.17 | $1.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +4.6% |
AVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CLMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AVT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallClimb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CLMB vs AVT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLMB or AVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the stronger pick with 40. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) offers the better valuation at 17. 5x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLMB or AVT?
On trailing P/E, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the cheapest at 17. 5x versus Avnet, Inc. at 29. 4x. On forward P/E, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLMB or AVT?
Over the past 5 years, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) delivered a total return of +251. 6%, compared to +94. 1% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLMB returned +435. 0% versus AVT's +132. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLMB or AVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Avnet, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning AVT is approximately 67% more volatile than CLMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 57% for Avnet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLMB or AVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is pulling ahead at 40. 1% versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Climb Global Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 14. 3% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Avnet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLMB leads at 28. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLMB or AVT?
Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 3% net margin versus 1. 1% for Avnet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLMB leads at 4. 5% versus 2. 8% for AVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLMB leads at 16. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLMB or AVT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 16. 2x for Avnet, Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLMB or AVT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Avnet, Inc. (AVT) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 0. 8% for Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB).
09Is CLMB or AVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 0. 8% yield, +435. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLMB: +435. 0%, AVT: +132. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLMB and AVT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLMB is a small-cap high-growth stock; AVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CLMB: 32.1% · AVT: 33.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CLMB: 17.5x · AVT: 29.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.