Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CLMB vs AVT vs NSIT vs SNX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
Technology Distributors
Technology Distributors
CLMB vs AVT vs NSIT vs SNX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $374M | $6.62B | $2.17B | $18.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $697M | $24.96B | $8.27B | $62.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $214M | $180M | $828M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 10.5% | 22.0% | 6.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 2.7% | 4.8% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | 16.2x | 6.6x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $2.88B | $1.59B | $4.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $192M | $358M | $2.44B |
CLMB vs AVT vs NSIT vs SNX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Climb Global Soluti… (CLMB) | 100 | 345.1 | +245.1% |
| Avnet, Inc. (AVT) | 100 | 296.8 | +196.8% |
| Insight Enterprises… (NSIT) | 100 | 137.3 | +37.3% |
| TD SYNNEX Corporati… (SNX) | 100 | 435.1 | +335.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLMB vs AVT vs NSIT vs SNX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 40.1%, EPS growth 14.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 1.11x
- 40.1% revenue growth vs AVT's -6.6%
- 3.0% margin vs AVT's 0.9%
AVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 1.6%
- Beta 1.27, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.43x
- 1.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SNX's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
NSIT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 13.9x)
SNX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs CLMB's 435.0%
- +103.2% vs NSIT's -47.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.1% revenue growth vs AVT's -6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 13.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs AVT's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs SNX's 1.43, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SNX's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.2% vs NSIT's -47.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs AVT's 1.7%, ROIC 29.7% vs 6.0% |
CLMB vs AVT vs NSIT vs SNX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLMB vs AVT vs NSIT vs SNX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NSIT leads in 2 of 6 categories
CLMB leads 1 • SNX leads 1 • AVT leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NSIT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNX is the larger business by revenue, generating $62.5B annually — 89.7x CLMB's $697M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.0% (CLMB) to 0.9% (AVT). On growth, AVT holds the edge at +33.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $697M | $25.0B | $8.3B | $62.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $781M | $477M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $214M | $180M | $828M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $33M | $235M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +10.5% | +22.0% | +6.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +2.7% | +4.8% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +0.9% | +2.2% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +0.1% | +2.8% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.1% | +33.9% | +1.2% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.1% | +12.9% | +3.4% | +32.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NSIT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, NSIT trades at a 51% valuation discount to AVT's 29.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NSIT's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVT's 12.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $374M | $6.6B | $2.2B | $18.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $341M | $9.3B | $3.4B | $20.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.47x | 29.40x | 14.48x | 23.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.71x | 16.22x | 6.60x | 13.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.49x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.23x | 12.44x | 7.05x | 11.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.57x | 0.30x | 0.26x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.14x | 1.41x | 1.38x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.59x | 11.47x | 7.77x | 13.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLMB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLMB delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $4 for AVT. CLMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSIT's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVT scores 6/9 vs CLMB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.7% | +4.3% | +11.2% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +1.7% | +2.0% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.7% | +6.0% | +10.3% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.5% | +7.9% | +10.3% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.57x | 0.96x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$33M | $2.7B | $1.2B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $192M | $358M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $2.9B | $1.6B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 415.66x | 2.80x | 2.97x | 3.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLMB five years ago would be worth $35,164 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,032 for NSIT. Over the past 12 months, SNX leads with a +103.2% total return vs NSIT's -47.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNX at 39.3% vs NSIT's -17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.4% | +64.6% | -16.2% | +52.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.2% | +65.6% | -47.2% | +103.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.0% | +105.0% | -43.3% | +170.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +251.6% | +94.1% | -29.7% | +94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +435.0% | +132.4% | +194.2% | +505.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.5% | +27.0% | -17.2% | +39.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLMB and SNX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNX's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNX currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs CLMB's 16.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.27x | 1.32x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $120.44 | $84.72 | $148.58 | $237.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.24 | $44.25 | $63.62 | $114.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.8% | +95.4% | +47.4% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 76.9 | 37.5 | 80.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 251K | 1.0M | 441K | 735K |
Analyst Outlook
AVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLMB as "Buy", AVT as "Hold", NSIT as "Buy", SNX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.9% upside for NSIT (target: $90) vs -23.9% for SNX (target: $177). For income investors, AVT offers the higher dividend yield at 1.60% vs SNX's 0.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $79.33 | $90.00 | $177.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 20 | 7 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +1.6% | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.17 | $1.30 | — | $1.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +4.6% | +7.0% | +3.3% |
NSIT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CLMB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CLMB vs AVT vs NSIT vs SNX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLMB or AVT or NSIT or SNX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the stronger pick with 40. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLMB or AVT or NSIT or SNX?
On trailing P/E, Insight Enterprises, Inc.
(NSIT) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Avnet, Inc. at 29. 4x. On forward P/E, Insight Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLMB or AVT or NSIT or SNX?
Over the past 5 years, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) delivered a total return of +251. 6%, compared to -29. 7% for Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNX returned +505. 0% versus AVT's +132. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLMB or AVT or NSIT or SNX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus TD SYNNEX Corporation's 1. 43β — meaning SNX is approximately 88% more volatile than CLMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 96% for Insight Enterprises, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLMB or AVT or NSIT or SNX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is pulling ahead at 40. 1% versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TD SYNNEX Corporation grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Avnet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLMB leads at 28. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLMB or AVT or NSIT or SNX?
Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 3% net margin versus 1. 1% for Avnet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NSIT leads at 4. 6% versus 2. 3% for SNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NSIT leads at 21. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLMB or AVT or NSIT or SNX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Insight Enterprises, Inc.
(NSIT) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 2x for Avnet, Inc. — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NSIT: 27. 9% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLMB or AVT or NSIT or SNX?
In this comparison, AVT (1.
6% yield), CLMB (0. 8% yield), SNX (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NSIT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLMB or AVT or NSIT or SNX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 0. 8% yield, +435. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLMB: +435. 0%, NSIT: +194. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLMB and AVT and NSIT and SNX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLMB is a small-cap high-growth stock; AVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NSIT is a small-cap deep-value stock; SNX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CLMB, AVT, SNX pay a dividend while NSIT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.