Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CLMB vs SNX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
CLMB vs SNX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $374M | $18.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $697M | $62.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $828M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 6.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $4.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $2.44B |
CLMB vs SNX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Climb Global Soluti… (CLMB) | 100 | 345.1 | +245.1% |
| TD SYNNEX Corporati… (SNX) | 100 | 435.1 | +335.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLMB vs SNX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 40.1%, EPS growth 14.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 1.11x
SNX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs CLMB's 435.0%
- +103.2% vs CLMB's -20.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.1% revenue growth vs SNX's 6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 13.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs SNX's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs SNX's 1.43, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, vs SNX's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.2% vs CLMB's -20.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs SNX's 2.4%, ROIC 29.7% vs 9.9% |
CLMB vs SNX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLMB vs SNX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNX is the larger business by revenue, generating $62.5B annually — 89.7x CLMB's $697M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.0% (CLMB) to 1.3% (SNX). On growth, CLMB holds the edge at +32.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $697M | $62.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $828M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +6.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.1% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.1% | +32.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CLMB and SNX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.5x trailing earnings, CLMB trades at a 25% valuation discount to SNX's 23.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLMB's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SNX's 11.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $374M | $18.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $341M | $20.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.47x | 23.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.71x | 13.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.49x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.23x | 11.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.57x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.14x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.59x | 13.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLMB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLMB delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $10 for SNX. CLMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNX's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SNX scores 6/9 vs CLMB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.7% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.7% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.5% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$33M | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 415.66x | 3.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLMB five years ago would be worth $35,164 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,416 for SNX. Over the past 12 months, SNX leads with a +103.2% total return vs CLMB's -20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNX at 39.3% vs CLMB's 20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.4% | +52.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.2% | +103.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.0% | +170.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +251.6% | +94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +435.0% | +505.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.5% | +39.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLMB and SNX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNX's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNX currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs CLMB's 16.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $120.44 | $237.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.24 | $114.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.8% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 80.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 251K | 735K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLMB and SNX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CLMB as "Buy" and SNX as "Buy". For income investors, CLMB offers the higher dividend yield at 0.84% vs SNX's 0.76%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $177.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.17 | $1.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +3.3% |
CLMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SNX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
CLMB vs SNX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLMB or SNX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the stronger pick with 40. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX). Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) offers the better valuation at 17. 5x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLMB or SNX?
On trailing P/E, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the cheapest at 17. 5x versus TD SYNNEX Corporation at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLMB or SNX?
Over the past 5 years, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) delivered a total return of +251. 6%, compared to +94. 2% for TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNX returned +505. 0% versus CLMB's +435. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLMB or SNX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus TD SYNNEX Corporation's 1. 43β — meaning SNX is approximately 88% more volatile than CLMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 55% for TD SYNNEX Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLMB or SNX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is pulling ahead at 40. 1% versus 6. 9% for TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TD SYNNEX Corporation grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to 14. 3% for Climb Global Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLMB leads at 28. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLMB or SNX?
Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 3% net margin versus 1. 3% for TD SYNNEX Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLMB leads at 4. 5% versus 2. 3% for SNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLMB leads at 16. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLMB or SNX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 13. 9x for TD SYNNEX Corporation — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLMB or SNX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) offers the highest yield at 0. 8%, versus 0. 8% for TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX).
09Is CLMB or SNX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
(CLMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 0. 8% yield, +435. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLMB: +435. 0%, SNX: +505. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLMB and SNX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLMB is a small-cap high-growth stock; SNX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.