Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CLNE vs UGI vs NWN vs SR vs SWX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
CLNE vs UGI vs NWN vs SR vs SWX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas |
| Market Cap | $507M | $6.94B | $2.11B | $5.05B | $6.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $439M | $7.36B | $1.29B | $2.47B | $2.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-99M | $641M | $123M | $358M | $464M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 30.3% | 22.4% | 73.3% | 33.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 15.4% | 26.9% | 22.1% | 20.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.6x | 16.4x | 16.5x | 21.3x |
| Total Debt | $99M | $7.56B | $2.76B | $5.24B | $3.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $158M | $355M | $41M | $6M | $577M |
CLNE vs UGI vs NWN vs SR vs SWX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Energy Fuels … (CLNE) | 100 | 110.5 | +10.5% |
| UGI Corporation (UGI) | 100 | 101.5 | +1.5% |
| Northwest Natural H… (NWN) | 100 | 78.1 | -21.9% |
| Spire Inc. (SR) | 100 | 117.3 | +17.3% |
| Southwest Gas Holdi… (SWX) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLNE vs UGI vs NWN vs SR vs SWX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLNE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +44.4% vs UGI's +0.7%
UGI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 21.3x), PEG 2.60 vs 2.67
- 4.5% yield, vs SR's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
NWN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth 36.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 11.8% revenue growth vs SWX's -62.0%
SR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.6%
- 71.4% 10Y total return vs SWX's 67.4%
- PEG 0.66 vs NWN's 4.55
SWX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 88.6%, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 0.06, yield 2.7%, current ratio 1.28x
- 18.5% margin vs CLNE's -22.7%
- Beta 0.06 vs CLNE's 1.19
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.8% revenue growth vs SWX's -62.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 21.3x), PEG 2.60 vs 2.67 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.5% margin vs CLNE's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs CLNE's 1.19 | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, vs SR's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.4% vs UGI's +0.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs CLNE's -9.2%, ROIC 4.7% vs -9.4% |
CLNE vs UGI vs NWN vs SR vs SWX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLNE vs UGI vs NWN vs SR vs SWX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLNE leads in 2 of 6 categories
SWX leads 1 • UGI leads 0 • NWN leads 0 • SR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLNE leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UGI is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.4B annually — 16.8x CLNE's $439M. SWX is the more profitable business, keeping 18.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLNE's -22.7%. On growth, CLNE holds the edge at +13.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $439M | $7.4B | $1.3B | $2.5B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $62M | $1.7B | $496M | $864M | $881M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$99M | $641M | $123M | $358M | $464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $629M | -$333M | -$2.7B | $72M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +30.3% | +22.4% | +73.3% | +33.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +15.4% | +26.9% | +22.1% | +20.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.7% | +8.7% | +9.6% | +14.5% | +18.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +8.5% | -25.9% | -108.1% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | +0.7% | -0.8% | -9.0% | -54.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.0% | +6.4% | -100.0% | +31.1% | +20.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CLNE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, UGI trades at a 47% valuation discount to SR's 19.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SR offers better value at 0.79x vs NWN's 5.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $507M | $6.9B | $2.1B | $5.1B | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $448M | $14.1B | $4.8B | $10.3B | $9.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.29x | 10.46x | 18.07x | 19.57x | 14.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.62x | 16.43x | 16.47x | 21.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.56x | 5.01x | 0.79x | 1.87x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 94.64x | 8.48x | 7.92x | 12.51x | 11.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.19x | 0.95x | 1.63x | 2.04x | 3.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 1.48x | 1.39x | 1.48x | 1.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.47x | 17.80x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CLNE and UGI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UGI delivers a 12.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-17 for CLNE. CLNE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWN's 1.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWX scores 7/9 vs SR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.2% | +12.8% | +8.3% | +10.4% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.2% | +4.1% | +2.0% | +2.9% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.4% | +7.1% | +8.1% | +4.7% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.4% | +8.3% | +8.1% | +5.8% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 1.58x | 1.87x | 1.54x | 0.89x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$59M | $7.2B | $2.7B | $5.2B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $158M | $355M | $41M | $6M | $577M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $99M | $7.6B | $2.8B | $5.2B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.07x | 2.69x | 2.39x | 2.62x | 2.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SWX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SWX five years ago would be worth $14,648 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,619 for CLNE. Over the past 12 months, CLNE leads with a +44.4% total return vs UGI's +0.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SWX at 20.5% vs CLNE's -18.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.9% | -13.1% | +9.2% | +3.8% | +14.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.4% | +0.7% | +18.4% | +16.6% | +22.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.3% | +22.3% | +19.6% | +38.7% | +74.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.8% | -13.1% | +8.5% | +32.1% | +46.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.9% | +9.6% | +22.0% | +71.4% | +67.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.7% | +6.9% | +6.2% | +11.5% | +20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NWN and SWX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NWN is the less volatile stock with a -0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLNE's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SWX currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs CLNE's 74.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 0.27x | -0.05x | 0.06x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.11 | $41.34 | $55.99 | $95.31 | $94.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.56 | $31.62 | $39.10 | $69.94 | $66.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.3% | +78.2% | +89.4% | +89.7% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 37.1 | 23.4 | 34.0 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.5M | 258K | 346K | 474K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UGI and SR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLNE as "Buy", UGI as "Buy", NWN as "Hold", SR as "Buy", SWX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.5% upside for CLNE (target: $4) vs 5.8% for SWX (target: $96). For income investors, UGI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.55% vs SWX's 2.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $42.00 | $57.00 | $97.00 | $96.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 10 | 8 | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.5% | +3.8% | +3.6% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 7 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.47 | $1.89 | $3.10 | $2.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLNE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SWX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
CLNE vs UGI vs NWN vs SR vs SWX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLNE or UGI or NWN or SR or SWX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) is the stronger pick with 11.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -62. 0% for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX). UGI Corporation (UGI) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLNE or UGI or NWN or SR or SWX?
On trailing P/E, UGI Corporation (UGI) is the cheapest at 10.
5x versus Spire Inc. at 19. 6x. On forward P/E, UGI Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Spire Inc. wins at 0. 66x versus Northwest Natural Holding Company's 4. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLNE or UGI or NWN or SR or SWX?
Over the past 5 years, Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
(SWX) delivered a total return of +46. 5%, compared to -73. 8% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SR returned +71. 4% versus CLNE's -26. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLNE or UGI or NWN or SR or SWX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
05β versus Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 's 1. 19β — meaning CLNE is approximately -2365% more volatile than NWN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 187% for Northwest Natural Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLNE or UGI or NWN or SR or SWX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) is pulling ahead at 11.
8% versus -62. 0% for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UGI Corporation grew EPS 147. 2% year-over-year, compared to -173. 0% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NWN leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLNE or UGI or NWN or SR or SWX?
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
(SWX) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -52. 3% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWN leads at 31. 4% versus -22. 1% for CLNE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SR leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLNE or UGI or NWN or SR or SWX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Spire Inc. (SR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus Northwest Natural Holding Company's 4. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, UGI Corporation (UGI) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 21. 3x for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. — 10. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLNE: 51. 5% to $3. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLNE or UGI or NWN or SR or SWX?
In this comparison, UGI (4.
5% yield), NWN (3. 8% yield), SR (3. 6% yield), SWX (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CLNE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLNE or UGI or NWN or SR or SWX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
05), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWN: +22. 0%, CLNE: -26. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLNE and UGI and NWN and SR and SWX?
These companies operate in different sectors (CLNE (Energy) and UGI (Utilities) and NWN (Utilities) and SR (Utilities) and SWX (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CLNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UGI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SWX is a small-cap deep-value stock. UGI, NWN, SR, SWX pay a dividend while CLNE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.