CLPR vs ELME vs UDR vs VRE

For growth investors, Veris Residential, Inc.

(VRE) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UDR, Inc. (UDR) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Veris Residential, Inc.

(VRE) is the cheapest at 23. 7x versus UDR, Inc. at 32. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, Veris Residential, Inc.

(VRE) delivered a total return of +16. 8%, compared to -42. 4% for Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UDR returned +38. 8% versus CLPR's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Veris Residential, Inc.

(VRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Clipper Realty Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning CLPR is approximately 329% more volatile than VRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 107% versus 2% for Elme Communities — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Veris Residential, Inc.

(VRE) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Veris Residential, Inc. grew EPS 420. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1066. 7% for Elme Communities. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRE leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Veris Residential, Inc.

(VRE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus -13. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UDR leads at 18. 8% versus 0. 0% for ELME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLPR leads at 80. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ELME: 796.

2% to $19. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Elme Communities (ELME) offers the highest yield at 34. 1%, versus 1. 7% for Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Veris Residential, Inc.

(VRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRE: -12. 8%, CLPR: -50. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CLPR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ELME is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UDR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; VRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.