Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CLPT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
CLPT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $343M | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $674M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $-168M | $153M | $-173M |
| Gross Margin | 61.4% | — | 65.4% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | -65.4% | — | 12.3% | -27.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $58M | $22M | $70M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46M | $194M | $1.12B | $103M |
CLPT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ClearPoint Neuro, I… (CLPT) | 100 | 287.0 | +187.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 216.4 | +116.4% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLPT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLPT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 17.8%, EPS growth -28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.6%
- 17.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26
- +110.4% vs CLPT's -12.1%
ALKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -11.0% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 30.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- Beta 1.06, current ratio 3.55x
- 9.8% margin vs CLPT's -69.1%
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs CLPT's -69.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs CLPT's 2.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs CLPT's -12.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
CLPT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CLPT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 3 of 6 categories
NVCR leads 1 • CLPT leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLPT's -69.1%. On growth, CLPT holds the edge at +34.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $0 | $1.6B | $674M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | -$112M | $212M | -$165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | -$168M | $153M | -$173M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | -$151M | $392M | -$48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.4% | — | +65.4% | +75.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -65.4% | — | +12.3% | -27.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -69.1% | — | +9.8% | -25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -66.1% | — | +25.1% | -7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.0% | — | +28.2% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | +91.5% | -4.1% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NVCR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $343M | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $355M | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.98x | -0.76x | 24.76x | -13.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.25x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.28x | — | 4.00x | 2.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.80x | 0.66x | 3.28x | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 12.28x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPT's 2.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -122.2% | -130.2% | +8.8% | -50.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.7% | -89.0% | +5.4% | -16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -73.7% | — | +18.9% | -16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.7% | -145.7% | +14.2% | -28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.08x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | -$172M | -$1.0B | $187M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46M | $194M | $1.1B | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $22M | $70M | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.31x | -189.82x | 32.30x | -96.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CLPT and NVCR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs CLPT's -12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPT at 6.8% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.7% | +4.9% | +25.3% | +28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.1% | +110.4% | +16.5% | +1.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.7% | +19.7% | +14.5% | -75.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.3% | -69.1% | +60.9% | -91.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.1% | -87.0% | -11.0% | +30.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.8% | +6.2% | +4.6% | -37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
ALKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLPT's 2.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs CLPT's 38.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 1.26x | 1.06x | 2.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.10 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $20.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.27 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $9.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.8% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +83.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 69.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 748K | 252K | 2.3M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLPT as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 24.3% for ALKS (target: $44).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $46.33 | $44.00 | $33.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 15 | 28 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
ALKS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NVCR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CLPT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs NVCR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLPT or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ClearPoint Neuro, Inc.
(CLPT) is the stronger pick with 17. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. (CLPT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CLPT or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVCR returned +30. 3% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CLPT or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
06β versus ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. 's 2. 34β — meaning CLPT is approximately 121% more volatile than ALKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CLPT or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ClearPoint Neuro, Inc.
(CLPT) is pulling ahead at 17. 8% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NovoCure Limited grew EPS 21. 8% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLPT leads at 21. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CLPT or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -69. 1% for ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -65. 4% for CLPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CLPT or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CLPT or DBVT or ALKS or NVCR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
06)). ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. (CLPT) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALKS: -11. 0%, CLPT: -25. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CLPT and DBVT and ALKS and NVCR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.