CLSKW vs NVDA

For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSKW) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 65. 5% for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSKW) is the cheapest at 0. 3x versus NVIDIA Corporation at 42. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1331%, compared to +510.

5% for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +234. 3% versus CLSKW's +510. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

73β versus CleanSpark, Inc. 's 2. 65β — meaning CLSKW is approximately 54% more volatile than NVDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 38% for CleanSpark, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSKW) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus 65. 5% for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to 66. 7% for NVIDIA Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.

6% net margin versus 47. 6% for CleanSpark, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 41. 6% for CLSKW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, CLSKW (10.

1% yield) pays a dividend. NVDA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSKW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (10. 1% yield, +510. 5% 10Y return). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLSKW: +510. 5%, NVDA: +234. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (CLSKW (Financial Services) and NVDA (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

CLSKW pays a dividend while NVDA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.