Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CLST vs SFNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CLST vs SFNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $65M | $3.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $627M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-398M |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | -84.2% |
| Forward P/E | 28.6x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $641M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $380M |
CLST vs SFNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catalyst Bancorp, I… (CLST) | 100 | 116.7 | +16.7% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLST vs SFNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 55.3%, EPS growth 171.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.00, Low D/E 18.0%, current ratio 0.40x
- NIM 3.5% vs SFNC's 2.9%
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 24.8% 10Y total return vs CLST's 18.3%
- Beta 1.01, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.86x
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 28.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 55.3% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 28.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.6% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (18.0% vs 18.8%) | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.0% vs SFNC's +14.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.6% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
CLST vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CLST vs SFNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLST leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $627M annually — 40.9x CLST's $15M. CLST is the more profitable business, keeping 13.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $627M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | -$497M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$398M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $755M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | -84.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | -63.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.8% | +42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CLST and SFNC each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $65M | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $55M | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.64x | -7.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.81x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.24x | 4.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.01x | 6.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLST leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLST delivers a 2.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. CLST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFNC's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLST scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | -11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | -9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $261M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $380M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $641M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLST five years ago would be worth $11,829 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,507 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, CLST leads with a +36.0% total return vs SFNC's +14.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLST at 18.8% vs SFNC's 15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.8% | +14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.0% | +14.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.7% | +52.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.3% | -14.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.3% | +24.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.8% | +15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLST and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLST is the less volatile stock with a 0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 95.9% from its 52-week high vs CLST's 88.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.00x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.16 | $22.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.60 | $17.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +95.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.1 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
SFNC is the only dividend payer here at 4.01% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | 0.0% |
CLST leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
CLST vs SFNC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLST or SFNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the stronger pick with 55. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. (CLST) offers the better valuation at 28. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CLST or SFNC?
Over the past 5 years, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) delivered a total return of +18. 3%, compared to -14. 9% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFNC returned +24. 8% versus CLST's +18. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CLST or SFNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 00β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 01β — meaning SFNC is approximately Infinity% more volatile than CLST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. (CLST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 19% for Simmons First National Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CLST or SFNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is pulling ahead at 55. 3% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 171. 8% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CLST or SFNC?
Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 4% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLST leads at 16. 3% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLST leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CLST or SFNC?
In this comparison, SFNC (4.
0% yield) pays a dividend. CLST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CLST or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 00)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLST: +18. 3%, SFNC: +24. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CLST and SFNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLST is a small-cap high-growth stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SFNC pays a dividend while CLST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.