CLVT
Clarivate Plc
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$1.78B
5Y Perf.-87.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CLVT vs TRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
Specialty Business Services
Market Cap$40.01B
5Y Perf.+29.2%
CLVT vs TRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CLVT | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $1.78B | $40.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.45B | $7.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-137M | $1.53B |
| Gross Margin | 66.5% | 53.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 3.8x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.48B | $2.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $329M | $511M |
CLVT vs TRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CLVT
TRI
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clarivate Plc (CLVT) | 100 | 12.1 | -87.9% |
| Thomson Reuters Cor… (TRI) | 100 | 129.2 | +29.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLVT vs TRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TRI leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Clarivate Plc is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CLVT
Clarivate Plc
The Value Play
CLVT is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (3.8x vs 20.8x)
- -33.3% vs TRI's -50.2%
Best for: value and momentum
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
The Income Pick
TRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 2.6%
- Rev growth 4.8%, EPS growth -30.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- 153.1% 10Y total return vs CLVT's -71.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TRI | 4.8% revenue growth vs CLVT's -4.0% |
| Value | CLVT | Lower P/E (3.8x vs 20.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | TRI | 19.9% margin vs CLVT's -5.6% |
| Stability / Safety | TRI | Beta 0.38 vs CLVT's 1.22, lower leverage |
| Dividends | TRI | 2.6% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CLVT | -33.3% vs TRI's -50.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TRI | 8.5% ROA vs CLVT's -1.2%, ROIC 11.2% vs 0.6% |
CLVT vs TRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
CLVT vs TRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTRILAGGINGCLVT
CLVTClarivate Plc
1leads
TRIThomson Reuters Corpo…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CLVTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CLVT6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TRI9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TRI4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TRI1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CLVT and TRI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.7B annually — 3.1x CLVT's $2.4B. TRI is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLVT's -5.6%. On growth, TRI holds the edge at +8.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CLVTClarivate Plc | TRIThomson Reuters C… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.4B | $7.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $878M | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$137M | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $597M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.5% | +53.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +22.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.4% | +8.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.2% | +7.6% |
Evenly matched — CLVT and TRI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CLVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CLVT's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRI's 14.1x.
| Metric | CLVTClarivate Plc | TRIThomson Reuters C… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $40.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.9B | $41.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.27x | 26.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.77x | 20.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.60x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.15x | 14.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.72x | 5.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.86x | 19.50x |
CLVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRI leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRI delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CLVT. TRI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLVT's 0.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRI scores 6/9 vs CLVT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CLVTClarivate Plc | TRIThomson Reuters C… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | +12.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.2% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.7% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.92x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.2B | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $329M | $511M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 18.32x |
TRI leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRI five years ago would be worth $10,570 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,001 for CLVT. Over the past 12 months, CLVT leads with a -33.3% total return vs TRI's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRI at -6.9% vs CLVT's -28.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CLVTClarivate Plc | TRIThomson Reuters C… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.2% | -28.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.3% | -50.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.3% | -19.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.0% | +5.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.0% | +153.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.4% | -6.9% |
TRI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLVT and TRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLVT's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLVT currently trades 58.3% from its 52-week high vs TRI's 41.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CLVTClarivate Plc | TRIThomson Reuters C… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.77 | $221.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.66 | $79.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.3% | +41.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.9M | 2.4M |
Evenly matched — CLVT and TRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TRI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CLVT as "Hold" and TRI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.3% upside for TRI (target: $147) vs 18.7% for CLVT (target: $3). TRI is the only dividend payer here at 2.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CLVTClarivate Plc | TRIThomson Reuters C… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.30 | $147.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.6% | +2.5% |
TRI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
TRI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CLVT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallThomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CLVT vs TRI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLVT or TRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is the stronger pick with 4.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Clarivate Plc (CLVT). Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) offers the better valuation at 27. 0x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLVT or TRI?
On forward P/E, Clarivate Plc is actually cheaper at 3.
8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLVT or TRI?
Over the past 5 years, Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) delivered a total return of +5.
7%, compared to -90. 0% for Clarivate Plc (CLVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRI returned +153. 1% versus CLVT's -71. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLVT or TRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Clarivate Plc's 1. 22β — meaning CLVT is approximately 224% more volatile than TRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 92% for Clarivate Plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLVT or TRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is pulling ahead at 4.
8% versus -4. 0% for Clarivate Plc (CLVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clarivate Plc grew EPS 68. 8% year-over-year, compared to -30. 5% for Thomson Reuters Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRI leads at 4. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLVT or TRI?
Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
1% net margin versus -8. 2% for Clarivate Plc — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRI leads at 26. 3% versus 2. 9% for CLVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLVT leads at 66. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLVT or TRI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Clarivate Plc (CLVT) trades at 3.
8x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Thomson Reuters Corporation — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRI: 60. 3% to $147. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLVT or TRI?
In this comparison, TRI (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. CLVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLVT or TRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 2. 6% yield, +153. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRI: +153. 1%, CLVT: -71. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLVT and TRI?
These companies operate in different sectors (CLVT (Technology) and TRI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
TRI pays a dividend while CLVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CLVT: -1.4% · TRI: 8.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.