CLVT vs TRI vs SPGI vs VRSK

For growth investors, S&P Global Inc.

(SPGI) is the stronger pick with 7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Clarivate Plc (CLVT). Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E (22. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the cheapest at 26. 9x versus S&P Global Inc. at 29. 2x. On forward P/E, Clarivate Plc is actually cheaper at 3. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: S&P Global Inc. wins at 2. 51x versus Thomson Reuters Corporation's 2. 83x.

Over the past 5 years, S&P Global Inc.

(SPGI) delivered a total return of +14. 2%, compared to -90. 0% for Clarivate Plc (CLVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPGI returned +337. 1% versus CLVT's -71. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Clarivate Plc's 1. 22β — meaning CLVT is approximately -3506% more volatile than VRSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 16% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), S&P Global Inc.

(SPGI) is pulling ahead at 7. 9% versus -4. 0% for Clarivate Plc (CLVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clarivate Plc grew EPS 68. 8% year-over-year, compared to -30. 5% for Thomson Reuters Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRSK leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -8. 2% for Clarivate Plc — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRSK leads at 44. 6% versus 2. 9% for CLVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPGI leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 51x versus Thomson Reuters Corporation's 2. 83x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Clarivate Plc (CLVT) trades at 3. 8x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — 19. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRI: 57. 5% to $147. 10.

In this comparison, TRI (2.

5% yield), VRSK (1. 0% yield), SPGI (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. CLVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), 1. 0% yield, +137. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRSK: +137. 1%, CLVT: -71. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (CLVT (Technology) and TRI (Industrials) and SPGI (Financial Services) and VRSK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

TRI, SPGI, VRSK pay a dividend while CLVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.