Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CLWT vs CODA vs PESI vs ITRI vs ERII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Waste Management
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
CLWT vs CODA vs PESI vs ITRI vs ERII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Aerospace & Defense | Waste Management | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls |
| Market Cap | $10M | $134M | $207M | $3.60B | $498M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33M | $28M | $59M | $2.35B | $127M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $4M | $-18M | $289M | $33M |
| Gross Margin | 25.0% | 66.3% | 4.1% | 38.6% | 64.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 17.4% | -26.3% | 13.2% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | 13.2x | 22.5x | — | 13.5x | 22.9x |
| Total Debt | $92K | $395K | $4M | $1.29B | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $29M | $12M | $1.02B | $48M |
CLWT vs CODA vs PESI vs ITRI vs ERII — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Euro Tech Holdings … (CLWT) | 100 | 123.8 | +23.8% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 212.5 | +112.5% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
| Itron, Inc. (ITRI) | 100 | 126.0 | +26.0% |
| Energy Recovery, In… (ERII) | 100 | 122.7 | +22.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLWT vs CODA vs PESI vs ITRI vs ERII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLWT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 6.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 2.30x
- Beta 0.37, yield 6.4%, current ratio 2.30x
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 22.9x)
CODA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
- 30.7% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3%
- +78.9% vs ERII's -37.3%
PESI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, ITRI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ERII ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 25.9% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
- 15.2% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 10.3% vs -21.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 22.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs PESI's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.9% vs ERII's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 10.3% vs -21.7% |
CLWT vs CODA vs PESI vs ITRI vs ERII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLWT vs CODA vs PESI vs ITRI vs ERII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLWT leads in 3 of 6 categories
CODA leads 1 • PESI leads 0 • ITRI leads 0 • ERII leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CODA and ERII each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 83.6x CODA's $28M. ERII is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33M | $28M | $59M | $2.3B | $127M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $292,750 | $6M | -$14M | $367M | $41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $4M | -$18M | $289M | $33M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $691,000 | $7M | -$14M | $393M | $27M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +66.3% | +4.1% | +38.6% | +64.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +17.4% | -26.3% | +13.2% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +14.8% | -30.1% | +12.3% | +25.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +24.6% | -23.4% | +16.7% | +21.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.6% | +28.8% | -20.1% | -3.3% | -97.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.9% | +3.0% | -110.5% | -16.9% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CLWT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, ITRI trades at a 61% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLWT's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODA's 17.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $134M | $207M | $3.6B | $498M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $106M | $200M | $3.9B | $460M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.16x | 32.16x | -14.89x | 12.46x | 22.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.45x | — | 13.47x | 22.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.51x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.16x | 17.85x | — | 10.48x | 16.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.62x | 5.05x | 3.36x | 1.52x | 3.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 2.30x | 4.11x | 2.15x | 2.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.27x | 22.20x | — | 9.44x | 28.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLWT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ERII delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. CLWT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITRI's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLWT scores 7/9 vs PESI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.2% | +7.2% | -34.5% | +17.2% | +17.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.8% | +6.6% | -20.2% | +7.7% | +15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +11.2% | -21.7% | +13.1% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +8.1% | -16.7% | +11.4% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.01x | 0.09x | 0.74x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$28M | -$7M | $267M | -$39M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $29M | $12M | $1.0B | $48M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $92,000 | $394,932 | $4M | $1.3B | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 74.42x | — | -42.14x | 14.38x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,567 for ERII. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs ERII's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs ERII's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.2% | +25.1% | -8.8% | -14.1% | -31.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.7% | +78.9% | +26.2% | -23.7% | -37.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.5% | +34.5% | +21.7% | +20.8% | -60.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | +49.7% | +45.6% | -7.2% | -54.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.8% | +844.4% | +178.6% | +94.4% | -11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.3% | +10.4% | +6.8% | +6.5% | -26.3% |
Risk & Volatility
CLWT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLWT is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLWT currently trades 76.7% from its 52-week high vs ERII's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.37x | 1.00x | 1.85x | 1.53x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.63 | $17.28 | $16.50 | $142.00 | $18.32 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.99 | $5.98 | $8.02 | $78.53 | $9.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.7% | +68.9% | +67.7% | +57.1% | +51.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.5 | 48.6 | 41.5 | 35.2 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 256K | 164K | 893K | 996K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLWT and PESI and ITRI each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CODA as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", ITRI as "Hold", ERII as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 68.8% upside for ITRI (target: $137) vs 17.6% for CODA (target: $14). CLWT is the only dividend payer here at 6.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 | $18.00 | $137.00 | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 1 | 37 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.8% | +7.2% |
CLWT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CODA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CLWT vs CODA vs PESI vs ITRI vs ERII: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLWT or CODA or PESI or ITRI or ERII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). Itron, Inc. (ITRI) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLWT or CODA or PESI or ITRI or ERII?
On trailing P/E, Itron, Inc.
(ITRI) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, Itron, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLWT or CODA or PESI or ITRI or ERII?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -54. 3% for Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus ERII's -11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLWT or CODA or PESI or ITRI or ERII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
37β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 393% more volatile than CLWT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 74% for Itron, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLWT or CODA or PESI or ITRI or ERII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -60. 4% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ITRI leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLWT or CODA or PESI or ITRI or ERII?
Energy Recovery, Inc.
(ERII) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 0% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ERII leads at 18. 2% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLWT or CODA or PESI or ITRI or ERII more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Itron, Inc.
(ITRI) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for Energy Recovery, Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ITRI: 68. 8% to $137. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLWT or CODA or PESI or ITRI or ERII?
In this comparison, CLWT (6.
4% yield) pays a dividend. CODA, PESI, ITRI, ERII do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLWT or CODA or PESI or ITRI or ERII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
37), 6. 4% yield, +164. 8% 10Y return). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLWT: +164. 8%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLWT and CODA and PESI and ITRI and ERII?
These companies operate in different sectors (CLWT (Industrials) and CODA (Industrials) and PESI (Industrials) and ITRI (Technology) and ERII (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CLWT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITRI is a small-cap deep-value stock; ERII is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLWT pays a dividend while CODA, PESI, ITRI, ERII do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.