Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CLWT vs ERII vs PESI vs XYL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Waste Management
Industrial - Machinery
CLWT vs ERII vs PESI vs XYL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Waste Management | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $9M | $471M | $204M | $27.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33M | $136M | $59M | $9.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $21M | $-18M | $973M |
| Gross Margin | 25.0% | 64.3% | 4.1% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 19.9% | -26.3% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 35.1x | — | 20.6x |
| Total Debt | $92K | $9M | $4M | $1.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $48M | $12M | $1.48B |
CLWT vs ERII vs PESI vs XYL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Euro Tech Holdings … (CLWT) | 100 | 115.8 | +15.8% |
| Energy Recovery, In… (ERII) | 100 | 118.8 | +18.8% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 196.8 | +96.8% |
| Xylem Inc. (XYL) | 100 | 171.5 | +71.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLWT vs ERII vs PESI vs XYL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLWT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 6.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 2.30x
- Beta 0.37, yield 6.8%, current ratio 2.30x
- Lower P/E (12.3x vs 20.6x)
ERII is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality is your priority.
- 15.1% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +15.8% vs ERII's -25.5%
XYL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth 7.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.8%
- 200.2% 10Y total return vs PESI's 174.4%
- 5.5% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 20.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.1% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs PESI's 1.74, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs XYL's 1.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.8% vs ERII's -25.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 2.6% vs -21.7% |
CLWT vs ERII vs PESI vs XYL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLWT vs ERII vs PESI vs XYL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLWT leads in 2 of 6 categories
ERII leads 1 • PESI leads 1 • XYL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ERII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XYL is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 272.8x CLWT's $33M. ERII is the more profitable business, keeping 15.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, ERII holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33M | $136M | $59M | $9.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $292,750 | $39M | -$14M | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $21M | -$18M | $973M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $691,000 | $27M | -$13M | $966M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +64.3% | +4.1% | +38.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +19.9% | -26.3% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +15.1% | -30.1% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +19.9% | -22.0% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.6% | +20.3% | -20.1% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.9% | -27.8% | -110.5% | +14.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CLWT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, CLWT trades at a 58% valuation discount to XYL's 29.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLWT's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XYL's 15.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $471M | $204M | $27.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $432M | $197M | $27.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.32x | 21.74x | -14.67x | 29.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.12x | — | 20.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.01x | 15.26x | — | 15.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 3.49x | 3.31x | 2.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | 2.40x | 4.05x | 2.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.48x | 26.98x | — | 29.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLWT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLWT delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. CLWT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XYL's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLWT scores 7/9 vs PESI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.2% | +10.9% | -34.5% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.8% | +9.6% | -20.2% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +10.3% | -21.7% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +11.3% | -16.7% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.05x | 0.09x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$39M | -$7M | $463M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $48M | $12M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $92,000 | $9M | $4M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 74.42x | — | -42.14x | 49.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PESI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,667 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,126 for ERII. Over the past 12 months, PESI leads with a +15.8% total return vs ERII's -25.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 6.2% vs ERII's -27.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.5% | -33.5% | -10.2% | -16.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.5% | -25.5% | +15.8% | -6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.0% | -61.2% | +19.8% | +10.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.8% | -48.7% | +46.7% | +0.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.1% | -14.7% | +174.4% | +200.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.3% | -27.1% | +6.2% | +3.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLWT and XYL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLWT is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XYL currently trades 73.7% from its 52-week high vs ERII's 49.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.37x | 1.63x | 1.74x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.63 | $18.32 | $16.50 | $154.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.99 | $9.03 | $8.02 | $113.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.8% | +49.8% | +66.7% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 35.1 | 35.7 | 40.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 937K | 164K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLWT and XYL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ERII as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", XYL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 63.6% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 33.3% for XYL (target: $152). For income investors, CLWT offers the higher dividend yield at 6.83% vs XYL's 1.41%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.00 | $18.00 | $151.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 1 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.8% | — | — | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | — | — | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +7.6% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
CLWT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ERII leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
CLWT vs ERII vs PESI vs XYL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLWT or ERII or PESI or XYL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xylem Inc.
(XYL) is the stronger pick with 5. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLWT or ERII or PESI or XYL?
On trailing P/E, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus Xylem Inc. at 29. 0x. On forward P/E, Xylem Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLWT or ERII or PESI or XYL?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +46. 7%, compared to -48. 7% for Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XYL returned +200. 2% versus ERII's -14. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLWT or ERII or PESI or XYL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
37β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 74β — meaning PESI is approximately 376% more volatile than CLWT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 17% for Xylem Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLWT or ERII or PESI or XYL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xylem Inc.
(XYL) is pulling ahead at 5. 5% versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -60. 4% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, XYL leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLWT or ERII or PESI or XYL?
Energy Recovery, Inc.
(ERII) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 0% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ERII leads at 18. 2% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ERII leads at 65. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLWT or ERII or PESI or XYL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Xylem Inc.
(XYL) trades at 20. 6x forward P/E versus 35. 1x for Energy Recovery, Inc. — 14. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 63. 6% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLWT or ERII or PESI or XYL?
In this comparison, CLWT (6.
8% yield), XYL (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ERII, PESI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLWT or ERII or PESI or XYL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
37), 6. 8% yield, +155. 1% 10Y return). Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLWT: +155. 1%, ERII: -14. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLWT and ERII and PESI and XYL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLWT is a small-cap deep-value stock; ERII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XYL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CLWT, XYL pay a dividend while ERII, PESI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.