Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CMBM vs NTGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
CMBM vs NTGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $4M | $708M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $172M | $690M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-98M | $-40M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 37.5% |
| Operating Margin | -48.1% | -4.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 129.4x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $51M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $210M |
CMBM vs NTGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cambium Networks Co… (CMBM) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
| NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) | 100 | 80.1 | -19.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMBM vs NTGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, CMBM is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
NTGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.39
- Rev growth 2.9%, EPS growth -371.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.4%
- -37.7% 10Y total return vs CMBM's -98.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.9% revenue growth vs CMBM's -25.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.8% margin vs CMBM's -57.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs CMBM's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -9.7% vs CMBM's -71.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.9% ROA vs CMBM's -44.1%, ROIC -8.4% vs -41.3% |
CMBM vs NTGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMBM vs NTGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $690M annually — 4.0x CMBM's $172M. NTGR is the more profitable business, keeping -5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMBM's -57.0%. On growth, CMBM holds the edge at +1.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $172M | $690M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$74M | -$19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$98M | -$40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +37.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -48.1% | -4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -57.0% | -5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.9% | -1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +64.2% | -123.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CMBM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $708M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $549M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.05x | -22.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 129.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 1.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTGR leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTGR delivers a -8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-8 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CMBM. NTGR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMBM's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTGR scores 5/9 vs CMBM's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.1% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -41.3% | -8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -40.1% | -6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | -$159M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $51M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -19.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTGR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTGR five years ago would be worth $6,704 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22 for CMBM. Over the past 12 months, NTGR leads with a -9.7% total return vs CMBM's -71.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTGR at 23.1% vs CMBM's -79.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -91.3% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -71.0% | -9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | +86.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -33.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -37.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -79.1% | +23.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NTGR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTGR is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMBM's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTGR currently trades 70.2% from its 52-week high vs CMBM's 1.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.80 | $36.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.13 | $19.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.9% | +70.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.8 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 957K | 515K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +19.1% | +7.2% |
NTGR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMBM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CMBM vs NTGR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMBM or NTGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETGEAR, Inc.
(NTGR) is the stronger pick with 2. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 8% for Cambium Networks Corporation (CMBM). Analysts rate NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) a "Hold" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CMBM or NTGR?
Over the past 5 years, NETGEAR, Inc.
(NTGR) delivered a total return of -33. 0%, compared to -99. 8% for Cambium Networks Corporation (CMBM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTGR returned -37. 7% versus CMBM's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CMBM or NTGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NETGEAR, Inc.
(NTGR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus Cambium Networks Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning CMBM is approximately 32% more volatile than NTGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 39% for Cambium Networks Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CMBM or NTGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETGEAR, Inc.
(NTGR) is pulling ahead at 2. 9% versus -25. 8% for Cambium Networks Corporation (CMBM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETGEAR, Inc. grew EPS -371. 4% year-over-year, compared to -490. 3% for Cambium Networks Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMBM leads at -7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CMBM or NTGR?
NETGEAR, Inc.
(NTGR) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 7% net margin versus -35. 2% for Cambium Networks Corporation — meaning it keeps -4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTGR leads at -5. 1% versus -27. 6% for CMBM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTGR leads at 36. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CMBM or NTGR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CMBM or NTGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NETGEAR, Inc.
(NTGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Cambium Networks Corporation (CMBM) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTGR: -37. 7%, CMBM: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CMBM and NTGR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.